In patients prescribed long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT), compliance is often poor. Both patient- and treatment-related factors seem to be involved. As a base for improvements in LTOT, the characteristics and complaints of LTOT patients were investigated. A survey was set up in a random sample of clients of the largest oxygen company in the Netherlands. Patients were selected if they were > or = 18 years old, had a phone and if they had had oxygen equipment for > or = 6 months. All patients were visited at home by a medical student. Data are presented for a total of 528 patients (response rate 62%). The typical LTOT patient was a 70-year-old male with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), who had had oxygen equipment for 3.5 years and who used oxygen cylinders and nasal cannulae for 13 h day-1. Twenty percent of the patients still smoked. Although LTOT was prescribed in 80% of the patients by a chest physician, prescription was often inadequate. Only 33% of the patients were informed adequately about the therapy. Twenty percent of the patients used oxygen for fewer hours per day than prescribed. Non-compliant patients were mainly men (P = 0.006) and more often ashamed of their therapy (P = 0.023) than compliant patients. The blood oxygen level was monitored regularly in 73% of the patients. Most complaints concerned the oxygen equipment, especially the concentrator. The single most important complaint had to do with restricted autonomy. Only 19% of the patients had no complaints at all. It is concluded that LTOT should be improved with regard to the education, motivation and monitoring of patients. The prescribing physician needs to be included in an education programme. Given the numerous problems these patients experience, LTOT should be improved in particular with regard to equipment convenience.

No abstract

Long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) has been shown to improve survival in hypoxaemic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This has resulted in recommending the prescription of oxygen for at least 15 h day-1 in most European countries. In order to examine the prescription and usage of LTOT and to assess the adherence to international recommendations for its prescription, a survey was set up in a random sample of clients of the largest oxygen company in the Netherlands. After patients had been visited for an interview, additional postal surveys were sent to the physician who had prescribed LTOT and to the oxygen company. For 175 COPD patients the mean oxygen prescription and mean oxygen usage were 15.6 +/- 5.8 and 14.1 +/- 6.8 h day-1, respectively. In 62 patients (35%) oxygen was prescribed < 15 h day-1, more often by non-chest physicians than by chest physicians (P < 0.0001), and 91 patients (52%) used oxygen < 15 h day-1. Of 113 patients with a prescription > or = 15 h day-1, 39 (35%) used oxygen < 15 h day-1 and 74 for > or = 15 h day-1. The latter were prescribed oxygen for more h day-1, had been longer on LTOT, had a higher resting flow rate, were prescribed a concentrator, employed portable cylinders and used oxygen in public significantly more often than the former. We conclude that in a selected group of LTOT patients with COPD both oxygen prescription and usage were often inadequate, particularly if LTOT was prescribed by non-chest physicians.

The oxygen flow rate delivered by liquid oxygen canisters may be less than intended, owing to inaccuracies of the set flow rates and/or as a result of the outflow resistance caused by the humidifier, oxygen tubing, delivery or conserving device. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of oxygen delivery by liquid oxygen canisters at different flow rates and levels of outflow resistance. Four stationary and 18 portable liquid oxygen canisters from three manufacturers were tested. All flows were measured using a Timemeter RT 200 Calibration Analyser. An adjustable obstruction was used to calculate the effect of the outflow resistance on the delivered flow rate. The measured and set flow rates of both stationary and portable canisters were strongly correlated. Expressed as a percentage of the set flow rate, the measured flow rate of the canisters varied from 36-128%, with the lowest values at flow rates <1 L x min(-1). Sixty-two (26%) of the measured flow rates differed > or =10% from the set flow rate. A difference of 0.5-1.0 L x min(-1) occurred in 16 (7%) of the measurements, but only at set flow rates >2 L x min(-1). Irrespective of the set flow rate, the measured flow rate was hardly affected by the outflow resistance. We conclude that the accuracy of oxygen delivery by liquid oxygen canisters depends on the inaccuracy of the set flow rates rather than on the outflow resistance, even at high flow rates. Although the differences between the measured and set flow rates were mostly small, they may have clinical significance, particularly in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. To prevent inaccuracy, monthly checks of the canisters by the oxygen provider at the patient's home are more important than yearly maintenance.