In long-term basal-bolus therapy, insulin detemir with insulin aspart as mealtime insulin is well tolerated and reduces the risks of nocturnal hypoglycaemia and weight gain compared to NPH insulin.

OBJECTIVEInsulin pump therapy (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion [CSII]) and multiple daily injections (MDIs) with insulin glargine as basal insulin and mealtime insulin lispro have not been prospectively compared in people naïve to either regimen in a multicenter study. We aimed to help close that deficiency.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSPeople with type 1 diabetes on NPH-based insulin therapy were randomized to CSII or glargine-based MDI (both otherwise using lispro) and followed for 24 weeks in an equivalence design. Fifty people were correctly randomized, and 43 completed the study.RESULTSTotal insulin requirement (mean ± SD) at end point was 36.2 ± 11.5 units/day on CSII and 42.6 ± 15.5 units/day on MDI. Mean A1C fell similarly in the two groups (CSII −0.7 ± 0.7%; MDI −0.6 ± 0.8%) with a baseline-adjusted difference of −0.1% (95% CI −0.5 to 0.3). Similarly, fasting blood glucose and other preprandial, postprandial, and nighttime self-monitored plasma glucose levels did not differ between the regimens, nor did measures of plasma glucose variability. On CSII, 1,152 hypoglycemia events were recorded by 23 of 28 participants (82%) and 1,022 in the MDI group by 27 of 29 patients (93%) (all hypoglycemia differences were nonsignificant). Treatment satisfaction score increased more with CSII; however, the change in score was similar for the groups. Costs were ∼3.9 times higher for CSII.CONCLUSIONSIn unselected people with type 1 diabetes naïve to CSII or insulin glargine, glycemic control is no better with the more expensive CSII therapy compared with glargine-based MDI therapy.

Insulin therapy with implantable pumps is effective and safe for periods up to 1.7 yr with a decreased risk of severe hypoglycemia than with intensive subcutaneous insulin therapy.

We undertook a trial to determine whether an implanted insulin-delivery system, the programmable implantable medication system (PIMS), could be used to treat patients with insulin-dependent diabetes. PIMS is a pulsatile, programmable pump with a battery life expectancy of five years. The reservoir is refilled transcutaneously every two months with a surfactant-stabilized human insulin preparation containing 400 U of insulin per milliliter. Eighteen patients received PIMS-delivered insulin for 4 to 25 months (mean, 18). The total PIMS-implantation experience comprised 28 patient-years. Good glycemic control was established and sustained during treatment (mean plasma glucose level, 7.3 mmol per liter; mean glycohemoglobin level, 8 percent [upper limit of normal, 7.5 percent]), with significantly reduced glycemic fluctuations. The total mean daily insulin dose did not change. Insulin solutions withdrawn from the pump reservoirs contained 92 percent native insulin and preserved biologic activity. There were no surgical or skin complications, severe hypoglycemic episodes, or instances of diabetic ketoacidosis. One pump was replaced because of a manufacturing defect, and four patients had catheter blockages due to omental-tissue encapsulation; two withdrew from the study and two had devices that were repaired successfully. The actuarial rate of survival of catheter function was 78 percent at 1.5 years. We conclude from this pilot study that insulin treatment with an implanted, variable-rate, programmable pump is feasible for periods up to two years.

There is a significant need for revised, safe, and more effective insulin-delivery methods than subcutaneous injections in the treatment of both type I (insulin-dependent) and type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes. The aim of this review is to describe the rationale and methods for better use of injection and infusion devices for intensive insulin therapy and to describe results of animal and human research that will lead to an implantable artificial pancreas. Injection devices, e.g., jet injectors, insulin pens, and access ports, cannot be considered as a major breakthrough in the quest for improved control, although they may improve the patient's comfort. External pumps have benefits over multiple injections and conventional insulin therapy only in specific subgroups of patients, e.g., those with recurrent severe hypoglycemia, but only when used by experienced personnel. The external artificial pancreas (Biostator) is also to be used by experienced personnel for limited clinical and research applications, e.g., surgery of the diabetic patient. The development of an implantable version of the artificial pancreas is linked to progress in the field of reliable long-duration glucose sensors. Finally, programmable implantable insulin pumps, used as an open-loop delivery system, are the most promising alternative to intensive subcutaneous insulin strategies in the short term, although clear evidence of improved safety and efficacy remains to be documented.

This work compares different routes of insulin infusion via portable pumps with chronically implanted catheters and evaluates the long-term feasibility of the technique. Six severely unstable (i.e., uncontrolled by optimized intensive insulin therapy) diabetic individuals (age range: 35 +/- 4 yr; duration: 11 +/- 2 yr) were selected. Promedos pumps (Siemens A. G., Erlangen, West Germany) were exclusively used because of their portability and long-life insulin reservoir (1-mo duration with U40 acidic Hoechst insulin). Each patient underwent three randomized 1-mo periods of insulin infusion: subcutaneous (s.c.), intravenous (i.v.), and intraperitoneal (i.p.) before the catheter was left indefinitely in one of these sites. Diabetic control was improved and insulin doses reduced whatever the route of infusion, although the s.c. route gave slightly higher values. These results did not deteriorate with time: mean blood glucose was 126 +/- 3 mg/dl and HbA1 was 8.3 +/- 0.6% after 10-18 mo of constant infusion versus 237 +/- 35 mg/dl and 10.0 +/- 0.8%, respectively, under conventional therapy. From a practical point of view, the i.p. route seems preferable since all s.c. catheters provoked local reactions after less than 1 mo and the two chronic i.v. catheters obstructed after 8 and 9 mo. All other incidents were minor and curable without removal of the catheters. All patients argued improvement of both diabetes and quality of life and no one has resigned so far. Thus, the i.p. infusion technique seems beneficial to unstable diabetic individuals and adaptable to long-term therapy, although intensive education and careful follow-up are necessary.

(i) HOMA is a simple and good predictor of the insulin-requiring stage in Type 2 diabetes mellitus; (ii) this stage of diabetes is characterized by a further decline of insulin secretion rather than of insulin sensitivity. Diabet. Med. 18, 584-588 (2001)

No abstract