The interplay of pain, discomfort, and fear can cause agitation in critically ill children. Therefore, sedation and analgesia are essential components in the intensive care unit setting and are best managed with a multidisciplinary team approach. No one standard approach exists to assess and manage pain and anxiety. Many tools are available for the assessment of pain and sedation, but each tool has its advantages and disadvantages. Clinicians should consider adopting a validated tool for routine continuous assessment. Multiple pharmacological therapies are available to manage pain, anxiety, fear, and agitation. Dosing of these agents can be influenced by age-related pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes. Agents should be selected on the basis of the child’s disease state, desired level of sedation, and cardiac and respiratory status.
Objective: Methadone is used to prevent opioid iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome (IWS) in children, but the optimal dose and overlap time with an opioid infusion have not been elucidated. The purpose was to compare clinical manifestations among patients who developed opioid IWS within 24 hours (early) versus ≥24 hours (late) of fentanyl discontinuation when enteral methadone was initiated. Design: A retrospective, descriptive study.Setting: Pediatric and cardiovascular intensive care units at a tertiary care health system.Participants: Sixty-seven children received fentanyl infusions for ≥3 days and initiated on methadone prior to fentanyl discontinuation.Main outcome measures: The primary objective was to compare clinical characteristics between those with early versus late opioid IWS. Opioid IWS was defined as a Withdrawal Assessment Tool-1 score ≥3 within 5 days of fentanyl discontinuation. Secondary objectives included a comparison of time to IWS, clinical characteristics, and risk factors among patients with and without IWS.Results: Fifty children (74.6 percent) developed opioid IWS within a median time of 3.5 hours. No differences were noted for those with and without IWS. Thirty-seven patients (74.0 percent) with IWS developed early IWS. A higher percentage of males in the late versus early group developed IWS, 100 percent versus 51.4 percent, p = 0.002. The median overlap time with methadone and fentanyl was shorter in the early versus late IWS group without reaching statistical significance, 27.5 versus 64.0 hours, p = 0.127.Conclusions: The majority developed opioid IWS, with most developing early IWS, despite methadone initiation. Future studies should evaluate the optimal methadone dosing and overlap time to prevent opioid IWS.
Azithromycin has been explored as a treatment option for eradication of Ureaplasma and prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in preterm neonates. However, there is debate about the need for eradication of Ureaplasma and whether azithromycin is safe and efficacious for this indication. This literature review provides an overview of the evidence for use of azithromycin for eradication of Ureaplasma and prevention of BPD, including dosing and duration of azithromycin used in these studies. The literature search included articles published in the English language in Medline and PubMed from 1946 to January 2022. Relevant citations within identified articles were also reviewed. A total of 9 studies representing 388 neonates were included. The percentage of neonates that tested positive for Ureaplasma in these studies ranged from 18.6% to 57.1%. Azithromycin was initiated at <3 days of life in 8 studies (88.9%). Dosing was variable and ranged from 5 to 20 mg/kg/dose administered once daily, and the duration of treatment ranged from 1 to 35 days. Most studies used intravenous azithromycin. Overall, azithromycin was more efficacious than placebo at Ureaplasma eradication; however, most of these studies did not find a difference in the incidence of BPD between patients receiving azithromycin versus placebo. No adverse effects, specifically pyloric stenosis or QT interval prolongation, were noted in these studies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.