In the present paper we compare prothrombin-converting activities of platelets non-activated, or activated by collagen, thrombin or collagen plus thrombin in the absence and presence of added factor V,. In all experiments described, the rate of thrombin formation for platelets activated by the combined action of collagen and thrombin is greater than that of platelets stimulated by collagen or thrombin alone. The presence of added factor V, enhanced the rate of thrombin formation in all cases, but the higher activity observed with platelets stimulated by collagen plus thrombin remains. When platelets are activated by collagen plus thrombin in the presence of factor X, and prothrombin, a lag period of approximately 10 min is observed before the rate of thrombin formation reaches a steady state. Addition of an excess of factor V, in this experiment reduces the lag time to 3 min. This lag period is interpreted as the time required to generate extra binding sites for the prothrombinase complex at the platelet surface. These extra sites explain the difference in thrombin formation rate between these platelets and platelets activated by either collagen or thrombin only.The exposure of phospholipids at the platelet outer surface was studied with phospholipases after various activations of the platelets. It is demonstrated that activation by collagen plus thrombin is accompanied by increased susceptibility of platelet phospholipids towards phospholipase Az. Among these degradable phospholipids are 25 % of the phosphatidylserine and 30 % of the phosphatidylethanolamine. On the other hand, little or no phosphatidylserine is exposed at the membrane exterior of thrombin-treated or control platelets. We propose that the exposure of phosphatidylserine at the outer surface of platelets activated with thrombin plus collagen is essential for the rate enhancement of thrombin formation observed under these conditions. The possibility of a transbilayer movement of phospholipids in the platelet membrane as a result of the activation process will be discussed.One of the major functions of platelets in the process of hemostasis is to provide a catalytic surface for the formation of the intrinsic factor-X-activating complex and the prothrombinase complex (for a review, see [I]). Nesheim et al. [2] have shown that there is no appreciable difference in catalytic efficiency of the prothrombinase complex when phospholipid vesicles plus factor Va are substituted for activated platelets. Rosing et al. [3] showed that the role of phospholipids in the prothrombinase complex is to decrease the K,,, for prothrombin below its plasma concentration, whereas factor V, strongly increases the V,,, of the reaction [2,3]. Recently, similar results were found for the role of phospholipids in the intrinsic factor-X-activating complex [4].It has been demonstrated that the cytoplasmic surfaces of both erythrocytes and platelets, as well as liposomes prepared from phospholipids present in the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane of these cells, possess a str...
The kinetic parameters of bovine prothrombin activation by factor Xa were determined in the absence and presence of factor Va as a function of the phospholipid concentration and composition. In the absence of factor Va, the Km for prothrombin increases proportionally with the phospholipid concentration and correlates well with the affinity of prothrombin for the different membranes. Phospholipid vesicles with a high affinity for prothrombin yield low Km values compared to membranes with less favorable binding parameters. At limited phospholipid concentrations, the Vmax of prothrombin activation correlates with the binding affinity of factor Xa for the various phospholipid vesicles. Membranes with a high affinity for factor Xa have high Vmax values, while for membranes with a low affinity a low Vmax is observed. Extrapolation of double-reciprocal plots of 1/Vmax vs. 1/[phospholipid] to infinite phospholipid concentrations, a condition at which all factor Xa would participate in prothrombin activation, yields a kcat of 2-4 min-1 independent of the type and amount of acidic phospholipid present in the vesicles. Also, in the presence of factor Va the Km for prothrombin varies proportionally with the phospholipid concentration. There is, however, no correlation between the binding parameters and the Km. Factor Va drastically lowers the Km for prothrombin for vesicles that have a low affinity for prothrombin. Vesicles composed of 20 mol % phosphatidylglycerol and 80 mol % phosphatidylcholine have a Km of 0.04 microM when factor Va is present, compared to 2.2 microM determined in the absence of factor Va.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
The specificity of endothelial binding sites for heparin was investigated with heparin fractions and fragments differing in their Mr, charge density and affinity for antithrombin III, as well as with heparinoids and other anionic polyelectrolytes (polystyrene sulphonates). The affinity for endothelial cells was estimated by determining I50 values in competition experiments with 125I-heparin. We found that affinity for endothelial cells increases as a function of Mr and charge density (degree of sulphation). Binding sites are not specific receptors for heparin. Other anionic polyelectrolytes, such as pentosan polysulphates and polystyrene sulphonates, competed with heparin for binding to endothelial cells. Fractions of standard heparin with high affinity for antithrombin III also had greater affinity for endothelium. However, these two properties of heparin (affinity for antithrombin III and affinity for endothelial cells) could be dissociated. Oversulphated heparins and oversulphated low-Mr heparin fragments had lower anticoagulant activity and higher affinity for endothelial cells than did their parent compounds. Synthetic pentasaccharides, bearing the minimal sequence for binding to antithrombin III, did not bind to endothelial cells. Binding to endothelial cells involved partial neutralization of heparin. Bound heparin exhibited only 5% and 7% of antifactor IIa and antifactor Xa specific activity, respectively. In the presence of 200 nM-antithrombin III, and in the absence of free heparin, a limited fraction (approx. 30%) of bound heparin was displaced from endothelial cells during a 1 h incubation period. These data suggested that a fraction of surface-bound heparin could represent a pool of anticoagulant.
SummaryThe activation of blood coagulation factor X by factor IXa is strongly stimulated by the non-enzymatic cofactors phospholipid, Ca2+ and activated factor VIII. In this paper we present a method by which we were able to determine binding affinities of factor IXa for phospholipids (either in the absence or presence of factor VIIIa) from kinetic measurements of factor X activation. It is shown that rates of factor X activation in the presence of phospholipids can be saturated with an excess factor VIIIa at limiting amounts of factor IXa and vice versa. Our data indicate that the enzymatic unit in the intrinsic factor X activator is a 1:1 stoichiometrical complex of factor IXa and factor VIIIa bound to phospholipid. Titrations with factor IXa at fixed concentrations of phospholipid and factor X show that the apparent dissociation constant of factor IXa for phospholipid is lowered from 10-6 M to 10-8 M by the presence of factor VIIIa. We conclude, that in analogy with the role of factor Va in prothrombin activation, phospholipid-bound factor VIIIa functions as a high-affinity binding site (»receptor«) for factor IXa in the intrinsic factor X activating complex. Therefore, factor VIIIa increases the observed Vmax of factor X activation by 1) enhancing the kcat of the reaction and 2) increasing the amount of phospholipid-bound factor IXa that participates in factor X activation.
As recommended by the World Health Organization, standardization of prothrombin time assays involves conversion of prothrombin times into International Normalized Ratios (INR). We investigated the effect of two different methods (Nycomed's Thrombotest, and Instrumentation Laboratory's PT-fibrinogen) and three coagulation instruments (Schnitger & Gross, KC-10, and ACL) on calculations of INR. The INR plots showed considerable scatter of individual values around the regression lines when the two different methods were compared. Systematic differences in the outcome of INR calculation were related to the use of the different coagulation instruments. Prothrombin times obtained with the different instruments were linearly correlated. We used the bias of these lines to correct results for both the patients' samples and the reference samples. This correction yielded INR values from the different instruments that agreed well.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.