Normal human centromeres contain large tandem arrays of alpha-satellite DNA of varying composition and complexity. However, a new class of mitotically stable marker chromosomes which contain neocentromeres formed from genomic regions previously devoid of centromere activity was described recently. These neocentromeres are fully functional yet lack the repeat sequences traditionally associated with normal centromere function. We report here a supernumerary marker chromosome derived from the short arm of chromosome 20 in a patient with manifestations of dup(20p) syndrome. Detailed cytogenetic, FISH, and polymorphic microsatellite analyses indicate the de novo formation of the marker chromosome during meiosis or early postzygotically, involving an initial chromosome breakage at 20p11.2, followed by an inverted duplication of the distal 20p segment due to rejoining of sister chromatids and the activation of a neocentromere within 20p12. This inv dup(20p) marker chromosome lacks detectable centromeric alpha-satellite and pericentric satellite III sequences, or centromere protein CENP-B. Functional activity of the neocentromere is evidenced by its association with 5 different, functionally critical centromere proteins: CENP-A, CENP-C, CENP-E, CENP-F, and INCENP. Formation of a neocentromere on human chromosome 20 has not been reported previously and in this context represents a new mechanism for the origin of dup(20p) syndrome.

We describe an adult male who was diagnosed with Down syndrome (DS) at 9 months of age, but had repeatedly normal karyotypes until recent mid-resolution chromosome studies showed a possible duplication of 21q22.13 to 21q22.3. The abnormality was investigated using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) studies. These showed hybridization of a whole chromosome paint probe (wcp21, Oncor Coatasome 21) to the entire length of both chromosome 21 homologues and one very large hybridization signal of a cosmid contig probe localized within bands 21q22.13-21q22.2(LSI-21, Vysis) on the ?dup(21q) homologue. CGH analysis identified a ratio of 1.5 for the segment of chromosome 21 involving band 21q22, indicating a gain of part, or all, of the terminal band of chromosome 21. The karyotype was thus defined as 46,XY,?dup(21) (q22.13q22.2).ish dup(21)(LSI-21++,wcp21+). Common DS characteristics in our case and 12 previously reported cases with duplications involving chromosome 21 included mental retardation, fifth finger clinodactyly, open mouth and oblique eye fissures. Transverse palmar creases and congenital heart defects, seen in DS less than 40% of the time, were infrequent. Presence of these features did not appear to depend on the specific portion of chromosome 21 that was duplicated. A review of 18 additional clinical features showed no consistent phenotype-genotype correlations.

Over 30% of female carriers of the fragile X [fra(X)] syndrome are clinically affected. A nonrandom X chromosome inactivation in these cases could be a plausible explanation. A review of previous studies addressing this question showed inconclusive results; thus, we analysed the X inactivation pattern in fibroblasts of 4 unrelated, mentally retarded fra(X) carriers with a high expression of the fragile site Xq27.3. Using Southern analysis with a highly polymorphic probe M27 beta that recognizes methylation differences between the active and inactive X chromosome we found a 50/50 inactivation pattern in 2 cases and skewed patterns in the other 2. As biased patterns were also observed in control females we conclude that at present no evidence exists for a nonrandom X chromosome inactivation in the fra(X) syndrome in females.

Normal human centromeres contain large tandem arrays of alpha-satellite DNA of varying composition and complexity. However, a new class of mitotically stable marker chromosomes which contain neocentromeres formed from genomic regions previously devoid of centromere activity was described recently. These neocentromeres are fully functional yet lack the repeat sequences traditionally associated with normal centromere function. We report here a supernumerary marker chromosome derived from the short arm of chromosome 20 in a patient with manifestations of dup(20p) syndrome. Detailed cytogenetic, FISH, and polymorphic microsatellite analyses indicate the de novo formation of the marker chromosome during meiosis or early postzygotically, involving an initial chromosome breakage at 20p11.2, followed by an inverted duplication of the distal 20p segment due to rejoining of sister chromatids and the activation of a neocentromere within 20p12. This inv dup(20p) marker chromosome lacks detectable centromeric alpha-satellite and pericentric satellite III sequences, or centromere protein CENP-B. Functional activity of the neocentromere is evidenced by its association with 5 different, functionally critical centromere proteins: CENP-A, CENP-C, CENP-E, CENP-F, and INCENP. Formation of a neocentromere on human chromosome 20 has not been reported previously and in this context represents a new mechanism for the origin of dup(20p) syndrome.