Corneal hysteresis, a new corneal parameter, had a moderate dependence on IOP and CCT US. Weaker corneas could be screened with ORA parameters, and low CH could be considered a risk factor for underestimation of IOP. The CCT US should continue to be considered a useful parameter.

The ocular response analyzer (ORA) (Reichert, Inc.) was used in the case of a middle-aged man who developed unilateral corneal ectasia after bilateral laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). The preoperative refraction was similar in the 2 eyes. Post-LASIK ectasia was central in the left eye; topography was oblate in the right eye. The ORA values consisted of the mean of 4 measurements. Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor were almost equal in the ectatic eye and the nonectatic eye. However, significant between-eye differences in the morphology of the signals were noted, most prominently in the lower amplitude of the applanation peaks in the ectatic eye. The shape of the applanation signal yielded important information in addition to corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor.

The ORA provides additional information in the screening of FFKc, with an accurate analysis of the corneal biomechanical properties according to CCT, air pressure, and infrared curves.

Intrastromal corneal ring implantation significantly decreased corneal curvature, with preoperative values predicting magnitude of change. However, it did not alter the viscoelastic biomechanical parameters of CH and CRF.

This is the first report to document interface fluid syndrome following a planned bioptics procedure.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract