Ductal morphogenesis and adult ductal branching patterns were examined in the rat prostate by a microdissection method. The rat prostate consists of paired (right and left) subdivisions which correspond in large part to the classically defined lobes: ventral prostate, lateral prostate, dorsal prostate, and coagulating gland. Of particular interest was the finding that the lateral prostate consists of two different ductal zones: (1) lateral type 1 prostate with 5-7 long main ducts (resembling miniature palm trees) that extend cranially towards both the seminal vesicle and dorsal prostate to arborize near the bladder neck, and (2) lateral type 2 prostate with 5-6 short main ducts that arborize caudal to the bladder neck and give rise to compact bushy glands. Both lateral prostatic groups had a ductal-acinar organization. The adult structure of the other rat prostatic lobes was also examined, and closely resembled their mouse counterparts. The ventral prostate, which had 2-3 pairs of slender main ducts per side, and the coagulating gland, which had 1 main duct per side, was completely ductal in structure. In contrast, the dorsal prostate, which had 5-6 pairs of main ducts per side, had a ductal-acinar structure. Ductal branching morphogenesis occurred at different rates in different lobes and was essentially complete in the prostate at the 30 days. Immunocytochemical studies with an antibody to DP-1, a major secretory protein of the rat dorsal prostate, revealed that secretory function was initiated at approximately 30 days after birth in the coagulating gland, the dorsal prostate, and lateral type 1 prostate. A consistent feature of the lateral type 2 prostate was the absence of DP-1. On Western blots, DP-1 was detected in the secretion of the coagulating gland, lateral type 1 and dorsal prostate, but not in the ventral and lateral type 2 prostate. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis confirmed this result and demonstrated that the lateral type 2 prostate expressed several low-molecular weight secretory proteins not found in the other lobes of the prostate. On the whole, the rat prostate exhibited considerable heterogeneity both between and within lobes in developmental processes, ductal patterning, histology, and functional expression.

No abstract

No abstract

Aims/hypothesis G protein-coupled receptor 40 (GPR40) is abundantly expressed in pancreatic beta cells in rodents, where it facilitates glucose-induced insulin secretion in response to mid-to long-chain fatty acids in vitro. However, GPR40 gene expression in humans has not been fully investigated, and little is known about the physiological and pathophysiological roles of GPR40 in humans. The aim of this study, therefore, was to examine GPR40 expression and its clinical implications in humans. Methods: GPR40 mRNA expression in the human pancreas, pancreatic islets and islet cell tumours was analysed using TaqMan PCR. Results: GPR40 mRNA was detected in all human pancreases collected intraoperatively. It was enriched approximately 20-fold in isolated islets freshly prepared from the pancreases of the same individuals. The estimated mRNA copy number for the GPR40 gene in pancreatic islets was comparable to those for genes encoding sulfonylurea receptor 1, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor and somatostatin receptors, all of which are known to be expressed abundantly in the human pancreatic islet. A large amount of GPR40 mRNA was detected in insulinoma tissues, whereas mRNA expression was undetectable in glucagonoma or gastrinoma. The GPR40 mRNA level in the pancreas correlated with the insulinogenic index, which reflects beta cell function (r=0.82, p=0.044), but not with glucose levels during the OGTT, the insulin area under the OGTT curve or the index for the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Conclusions/interpretation The present study provides evidence for GPR40 gene expression in pancreatic beta cells and implicates GPR40 in insulin secretion in humans.

During angiogenesis endothelial cells migrate towards a chemotactic stimulus. Understanding the mechanism of endothelial cell migration is critical to the therapeutic manipulation of angiogenesis and ultimately cancer prevention. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a potent chemotactic stimulus of endothelial cells during angiogenesis. The endothelial cell signal transduction pathway of VEGF represents a potential target for cancer therapy, but the mechanisms of post-receptor signal transduction including the roles of rho family GTPases in regulating the cytoskeletal effects of VEGF in endothelial cells are not understood. Here we analyze the mechanisms of cell migration in the mouse brain endothelial cell line (bEND3). Stable transfectants containing a tetracycline repressible expression vector were used to induce expression of Rac mutants. Endothelial cell haptotaxis was stimulated by constitutively active V12Rac on collagen and vitronectin coated supports, and chemotaxis was further stimulated by VEGF. Osteopontin coated supports were the most stimulatory to bEND3 haptotaxis, but VEGF was not effective in further increasing migration on osteopontin coated supports. Haptotaxis on support coated with collagen, vitronectin, and to a lesser degree osteopontin was inhibited by N17 Rac. N17 Rac expression blocked stimulation of endothelial cell chemotaxis by VEGF. As part of the chemotactic stimulation, VEGF caused a loss of actin organization at areas of cell-cell contact and increased stress fiber expression in endothelial cells which were directed towards pores in the transwell membrane. N17 Rac prevented the stimulation of cell-cell contact disruption and the stress fiber stimulation by VEGF. These data demonstrate two pathways of regulating endothelial cell motility, one in which Rac is activated by matrix/integrin stimulation and is a crucial modulator of endothelial cell haptotaxis. The other pathway, in the presence of osteopontin, is Rac independent. VEGF stimulated chemotaxis, is critically dependent on Rac activation. Osteopontin was a potent matrix activator of motility, and perhaps one explanation for the absence of a VEGF plus osteopontin effect is that osteopontin stimulated motility was inhibitory to the Rac pathway.