No abstract

The hypothetically negative influence of food on the clinical activity of seropositive rheumatoid arthritis was studied using two types of artificial elementary food. One diet was allergen free, the other aliergen restricted, containing only lactoproteins and yellow dyes. Ninety four patients entered the study, which lasted 12 weeks. During the second four week period they were randomly assigned to one ofthe two artificial foods. Comparison between baseline and subsequent periods showed only subjective improvements. No differences were seen between the clinical effects of the two tested diets. Nine patients (three in the allergen restricted group, six in the allergen free group) showed favourable responses, followed by marked disease exacerbation during rechallenge. Dietary manipulation also brought about changes in objective disease activity parameters in these patients. The existence of a subgroup of patients in whom food intolerance influences the activity of rheumatoid factor seropositive rheumatoid arthritis deserves serious consideration.

A prospective controlled study of the effect of the Swedish Back School in chronic idiopathic Low Back Pain was conducted. Forty-eight patients entered the study. There were no significant pre-treatment differences between the experimental group members who attended the four lessons of the Back School, and the control group who received four detuned shortwave applications to the low back. Forty-three patients (21 in the experimental and 22 in the control group) completed the study. Subjects were repeatedly tested for one year. The following assessments were made: 1) subjective scores of pain and functional capacity, and 2) objective measurements of spinal mobility. After one year, no statistically significant differences between the two groups were observed. Given the proven efficacy of the Back School in (sub)acute Low Back Pain, it should be administered when it is most beneficial, i.e. in the early phase of Low Back Pain.

The effects of total hip replacement (THR) on quality of life were investigated in 62 patients with osteoarthrosis (OA) and 35 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients eligible for a first hip joint replacement were enrolled consecutively and examined at home before the operation and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The IRGL (Influence of Rheumatic Diseases on Health and Lifestyle), a Dutch version of the AIMS (Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales), was used to operationalize quality of life in a questionnaire. Pain and mobility scores showed significant improvement among both OA and RA patients. The general mood of the OA patients also improved significantly, but the RA group showed only a favourable tendency in this respect. The interference of OA in several areas of life almost disappeared, whereas the impact of RA was only slightly reduced. There was no discernible effect on the social dimension in either group. A single THR apparently solves the main problem of most OA patients, but only one of a number of joint problems for most RA patients. The IRGL is complex and time-consuming and contains irrelevant scales. Its multidimensional evaluation of the quality of life is more informative than a purely somatic evaluation.