Chronic airways inflammation is one of the features of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We demonstrated previously that bronchiolar epithelium in COPD contains increased numbers of macrophages and mast cells. Transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF-beta1) may be involved in this influx because it has chemotactic activity for macrophages and mast cells. In this study, we examined expression patterns of TGF-beta1, TGF-beta receptors type I and II (TGF-betaRI and TGF-betaRII) by immunohistochemistry and mRNA in situ hybridization in peripheral lung tissue of 14 current or ex-smokers with COPD (FEV1 < 75%) and 14 without COPD (FEV1 > 84%). In both groups, TGF-beta1 and its receptors are present in airway and alveolar epithelial cells, airway and vascular smooth muscle cells, and tissue and alveolar CD68(+) cells (considered herein to be macrophages). In subjects with COPD, a semiquantitative analysis revealed approximately twofold higher levels of TGF-beta1 mRNA and protein in bronchiolar and alveolar epithelium (p < 0.02) as compared with subjects without COPD. With regard to bronchiolar epithelial cells, we found a significant correlation between TGF-beta1 mRNA and protein expression (r = 0.62; p < 0.002), and between the FEV1 of all subjects together and TGF-beta1 protein (r = -0.60; p < 0.0002) and mRNA (r = -0.67; p < 0. 002) levels. The epithelial expression of TGF-beta1 mRNA and TGF-beta1 protein correlates with the number of intraepithelial macrophages (both: r = 0.44; p < 0.03) whereas intraepithelial mast cell numbers correlate with epithelial TGF-beta1 mRNA expression. These data suggest a role for TGF-beta1 in recruiting macrophages into the airway epithelium in COPD.
The cysteinyl leukotriene LTE4 has been shown to induce airway eosinophilia in asthmatics in vivo. This phenomenon has not yet been reported for LTD4. Hence, we examined the effect of inhaled LTD4 and a control bronchoconstrictor agent, methacholine, on cell differentials in hypertonic saline-induced whole sputum samples of 12 nonsmoking atopic asthmatic subjects (three women, nine men; 21 to 29 yr of age; FEV1, 74 to 120% pred; PC20FEV1 methacholine < 9.6 mg/ml). The study had a cross-over, placebo-controlled design consisting of 4 d separated by > or = 1 wk. On each randomized study day, the subjects inhaled five serial doses of either LTD4 (mean cumulative concentration: 95.7 microM) or methacholine (mean cumulative concentration: 542 mM) or five doses of their respective diluents (PBS/ethanol or PBS). The airway response was measured by FEV1, followed by sputum induction with 4.5% NaCl, 4 h postchallenge. Inflammatory cells (> or = 250) were counted twice on coded cytospins and expressed as percentages of nonsquamous cells. There was no significant difference in the maximal percent fall in FEV1 from baseline between LTD4 (mean +/- SEM, 49.5 +/- 4.4% fall) and methacholine (mean +/- SEM, 55.9 +/- 3.4% fall) (p = 0.11). LTD4 induced a significant increase in the percentage of sputum eosinophils as compared with its diluent (mean +/- SD, 26.6 +/- 21.3% and 10.2 +/- 8.8%, respectively; p = 0.025), whereas a similar trend for methacholine failed to reach significance (mean +/- SD, 19.1 +/- 22.9% and 7.8 +/- 5.8%, respectively; p = 0.11). There was no significant difference in the changes in the percentage of sputum eosinophils between LTD4 and methacholine (mean difference +/- SD, 7.5 +/- 12.5% eosinophils; p = 0.09). We conclude that LTD4 induces eosinophilia in sputum of asthmatic subjects 4 h after inhalation. Our data suggest that LTD4 recruits eosinophils into the airways of asthmatics in vivo, possibly by virtue of direct or indirect chemotactic properties, whereas an additional effect of vigourous airway narrowing per se cannot be excluded.
We conclude that the eosinophil counts in hypertonic saline-induced sputum from patients with asthma are related to those in bronchial wash and BAL and, to a lesser extent, with the counts in bronchial biopsies. This suggests that induced sputum can be used to monitor the presence and severity of airway inflammation in asthma.
The severity of breathlessness at given degrees of airway obstruction varies between patients with asthma. It has been postulated that the symptoms during bronchoconstriction are determined in part by involvement of airway inflammation. We compared the severity of breathlessness at various degrees of acute airway obstruction between a direct stimulus of airway smooth muscle, methacholine, and an indirectly acting stimulus, hypertonic saline. Twelve atopic asthmatic adults (mean +/- SD; age 25.3 +/- 3.4 yr; baseline FEV1 91.2 +/- 10.4% pred; PC20 1.0 mg/ml methacholine +/- 1.7 doubling dose) entered a methacholine and a hypertonic saline period in random order. In each period doubling doses of either methacholine (0.03 to 256 mg/ml) or hypertonic saline (0.9 to 14.4% NaCl) were inhaled on two occasions 7 d apart, using standardized tidal breathing methods. The response was obtained by FEV1 and, in order to assess volume history effects on airway caliber, by the ratio of flows obtained from volume history standardized maximal and partial expiratory flow-volume curves (M/P ratio). Breathlessness was measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS), which ranged from 0 (none) to 100% (most severe experienced). The subjects were blinded to the response in lung function. The changes from baseline in VAS scores at intervals of 5% fall in FEV1 (delta VAS) and the changes in M/P ratios (delta M/P ratio) were calculated by linear interpolation. The results were analyzed by MANOVA. There were no differences in baseline FEV1 or baseline VAS scores between the methacholine and hypertonic saline periods (p > 0.40).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
The expression of the endogenous neuropeptide-degrading enzyme, neutral endopeptidase (NEP; CALLA, CD10, E.C.3.4.24.11) on cultured human airway epithelial cells can be upregulated by corticosteroids. We examined whether NEP expression in the airway epithelium or lamina propria in bronchial biopsies is enhanced in atopic asthmatics on regular inhaled steroids as compared with those without steroid treatment. Forty nonsmoking adults (age 19 to 48 yr) with mild to moderate asthma (forced expiratory volume in 1 s > or = 50% pred., histamine PC20 range 0.02 to 7.6 mg/ml) with (n = 23) or without (n = 17) regular inhaled steroids treatment entered the study. Biopsies were taken at (sub)segmental level from the right lower lobe, the middle lobe, and the main carina. Immunohistochemical staining was performed on cryostat sections using the VIL-A1 monoclonal antibody against CD10 (NEP). Intra- and inter-observer repeatability of a semiquantitative scoring method was good as assessed by weighted kappa (kappa(w) ranging from 0.66 to 0.81). In the airway epithelium, NEP-positive sites were within the basal layer and, in contrast with studies applying other antibodies, also at apical sites and within the lamina propria. In both the epithelium and lamina propria, NEP expression was not significantly different between the three biopsy sites (Friedman's nonparametric two-way analysis of variance; P > 0.68), nor was expression in the lamina propria associated with inhaled steroid usage (Mann-Whitney U test; P = 0.98). However, NEP expression was significantly enhanced in the airway epithelium in patients using inhaled steroids as compared with nonsteroid users (mean rank: 23.4 and 15.5, respectively; P = 0.02). Among nonsteroid-using subjects, NEP expression was related to symptoms and the methacholine PC20 (Rs: -0.69 and 0.49, respectively; P < or = 0.04). We conclude that the expression of NEP is enhanced in airway epithelium in bronchial biopsy specimens from patients with atopic asthma who are regularly using inhaled steroids as compared with patients who do not. This fits the hypothesis that the anti-inflammatory effect of corticosteroids within the airways is partially mediated by the upregulation of the endogenous neuropeptide-degrading enzyme NEP.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.