Abstract-Hydrological models are being used for different applications. Quantifying the uncertainty of popular Hydrological models has been well documented, especially with Bayesian methods such as the Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE). However, research studies have often either neglected the lesser known hydrological models or have performed a typical Bayesian analysis of uncertainty. In this paper, the SLURP model's uncertainty is examined using a novel approach of the GLUE method. Instead of considering the overall Nash Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), the NSE values of different magnitudes of flows are considered simultaneously to capture the predictive uncertainties of the SLURP model. By using a Multi-Criterion Decision Analysis (MCDA) method, the NSE values of different flow periods are simultaneously considered when computing the predictive intervals of the SLURP model. Also, the potential issues of using a MCDA based GLUE approach in lieu of the traditional GLUE approach are discussed.Index Terms-TOPSIS, MCDA, bayesian, GLUE.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.