SummaryThe present trial was designed to comparatively investigate the pharmacokinetic profile and evaluate the apparent bioavailability pattern of three already marketed low molecular mass heparins (LMMHs): dalteparin (Fragmin®), nadroparin (Fraxiparin®), and enoxaparin (Love- nox®) given by subcutaneous route. The study was carried out in 20 healthy young volunteers given, according to a cross over design, a single subcutaneous injection of the doses recommended for the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis (commercial preparations, prefilled syringes): dalteparin 2,500 IU (= 2,500 IU anti-Xa), nadroparin 7,500 ICU (= 3,075 IU anti-Xa), enoxaparin 20 mg (= 2,000 IU anti-Xa) and enoxaparin 40 mg (= 4,000 IU anti-Xa). Of the markers used, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), thrombin clotting time (TCT), Heptest®, anti-thrombin (aIIa) activity and anti-Xa (aXa) activity, the most pertinent parameter (from a biodynamic viewpoint) is plasma aXa activity. We demonstrated that dalteparin, nadroparin and enoxaparin exhibit statistically significantly different pharmacokinetic and overall disposition patterns. Normalized to the same injected dose (1,000 IU aXa), the relative actual amount of plasma anti-Xa activity generated by enoxaparin is 1.48 times greater (p < 0.001) than that of nadroparin and 2.28 times greater (p < 0.001) than that of dalteparin while the plasma amount induced by nadroparin is 1.54 times greater (p < 0.001) than that of dalteparin. The apparent total body clearance of enoxaparin doses (CL/F = 16.7 ± 5.5 and 13.8 ± 3.2 ml/min) is significantly smaller than those of nadroparin (CL/F = 21.4 ± 7.0 ml/min ; p < 0.01) and dalteparin (CL/F = 33.3 ±11.8 ml/min ; p < 0.001) while dalteparin apparent clearance is about 1.5-fold greater (p < 0.001) than that of nadroparin. These LMMHs also differ by their renal excretion pattern : more fragments exhibiting an anti-Xa activity are recovered in urine following enoxaparin doses (6.4 and 8.7 % of the dose, respectively) than following nadroparin (3.9 %) and dalteparin (3.4 %) injection. These differences in the disposition profiles explain why the apparent elimination half life t1/2 values of the LMMHs compared here are different: dalteparin: 2.8 h; nadroparin: 3.7 h; and enoxaparin: 4.1 h. Whether or not these differences may contribute to explain the different safety/efficacy balance of each of these antithrombotic medications remains to be discussed and needs further studies.

No abstract

Ticlopidine is a new platelet aggregation inhibitor. The effect of this drug was studied on 55 subjects, healthy volunteers and hospitalized patients. The action requires 24 to 48 hr to appear, and lasts more than 3 days. A dose-effect relationship was studied with oral daily doses ranging from 250 to 1,000 mg during 1 wk; it showed a 50% inhibition on adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced aggregation at 2 muM concentration on an oral daily dose of 450 mg. No action was found on collagen-induced aggregation, and a mild effect was observed on platelet adhesiveness. Clinical tolerance was assessed in patients given ticlopidine in oral doses up to 500 mg/day during several weeks, showing no overt side effects and no change in the safety parameters.

The important problem of initiation of long-term lithium treatment is tackled by means of the selection of an a priori dosage regimen based on the presumed efficacy of lithium and absence of toxicity. The pharmacokinetics of Li+ ion is represented by a four-compartment open model including the supposed first-order processes for the release of the active compound from the dosage form and its absorption. Experimental protocols for measurements of serum concentrations and of urinary amounts after single and multiple dosing to healthy volunteers were derived with several oral dosage forms. Estimation of the pharmacokinetic parameters for each subject made it possible to validate the model for the various dosage forms. The interindividual variability of these parameters is taken into account by estimating the characteristics of the statistical distribution for the whole population. A dosage regimen is considered optimum when serum concentration profiles at steady state range from the threshold of efficacy (0.8 mmol/liter) to the threshold of toxicity (2.0 mmol/liter). When the number of daily intakes is fixed, the search for the optimum dose for the whole population is effected by minimizing the expected value of the random variable which characterizes the risks of excursion out of the therapeutic range. By this means universal dosages are shown to be unsatisfactory. However, certain dosage regimens individualized with respect to the renal clearance value of lithium and based on two or three daily intakes can give excellent results even when conventional dosage forms are used.

The pharmacokinetics of sparfloxacin at oral doses of 200, 400, 600, and 800 mg were studied in 12 healthy volunteers in a randomized double-blind crossover study. Each dose administration was separated by a 1-week washout period. Plasma and urine samples were collected up to 120 hours postdosing, for determination of free and total (free plus glucurono-conjugated) sparfloxacin levels by high-performance liquid chromatography assay and ultraviolet detection. Mean Cmax values ranged from 705 +/- 158 to 1966 +/- 620 ng/mL for the 200 to 800 mg doses, at median tmax ranging from 4 to 5 hours. A slight decrease of sparfloxacin bioavailability with increasing dose was observed because AUC was 87% to 88% of the expected area when the dose was doubled. The elimination half-life values were constant over the dose range (with values ranging from 18 to 21 hours) as well as the renal clearance. The metabolic ratio conjugated/free drug was not modified by increasing dose.