As with all alloys, the grain structure of the nickel-base superalloy 625 has a significant impact on its mechanical properties. Predictability of the grain structure evolution in this material is particularly pertinent because it is prone to inter-metallic precipitate formation both during manufacture and long term or high temperature service. To this end, analysis has been performed on the grain structure of Alloy 625 aged isothermally at temperatures between 600-800 • C for times up to 3000 hours. Fits made according to the classical Arrhenius equation describing normal grain growth yield an average value for the activation energy of a somewhat inhomogeneous grain structure above 700 • C of 108.3±6.6 kJ mol −1 and 46.6±12.2 kJ mol −1 below 650 • C. Linear extrapolation between 650-700 • C produces a significantly higher value of 527.7 ± 23.1 kJ mol −1 . This result is ultimately a consequence of a high driving force, solute-impeded grain boundary migration process operating within the alloy.Comparison of the high and low temperature values with the activation energy for volume self-diffusion and grain boundary diffusion identifies the latter as the principle governing mechanism for grain growth in both instances. A decrease in the value of the time exponent (n) at higher temperatures despite a reduction in solute drag is attributable to the Zener pinning imposed by grain boundary M 6 C and M 23 C 6 particles identified from Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDXS) analysis.Vickers hardness results show the dominance of intermetallic intragranular precipitates in 1 the governance of the mechanical properties of the material with grain coarsening being accompanied by a significant increase in hardness. Furthermore, the lack of any correlation with grain growth behaviour indicates these phases have no significant effect on the grain evolution of the material.
ObjectivesTo investigate the value of rotational coronary angiography (RoCA) in the context of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) planning.BackgroundAs a diagnostic tool, RoCA is associated with decreased patient irradiation and contrast use compared with conventional coronary angiography (CA) and provides superior appreciation of three‐dimensional anatomy. However, its value in PCI remains unknown.MethodsWe studied stable coronary artery disease assessment and PCI planning by interventional cardiologists. Patients underwent either RoCA or conventional CA pre‐PCI for planning. These were compared with the referral CA (all conventional) in terms of quantitative lesion assessment and operator confidence. An independent panel reanalyzed all parameters.ResultsSix operators performed 127 procedures (60 RoCA, 60 conventional CA, and 7 crossed‐over) and assessed 212 lesions. RoCA was associated with a reduction in the number of lesions judged to involve a bifurcation (23 vs. 30 lesions, P < 0.05) and a reduction in the assessment of vessel caliber (2.8 vs. 3.0 mm, P < 0.05). RoCA improved confidence assessing lesion length (P = 0.01), percentage stenosis (P = 0.02), tortuosity (P < 0.04), and proximity to a bifurcation (P = 0.03), particularly in left coronary artery cases. X‐ray dose, contrast agent volume, and procedure duration were not significantly different.ConclusionsCompared with conventional CA, RoCA augments quantitative lesion assessment, enhances confidence in the assessment of coronary artery disease and the precise details of the proposed procedure, but does not affect X‐ray dose, contrast agent volume, or procedure duration. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.