The role of glucosinolates in the oviposition behaviour of the cabbage root fly, Delia radicum (L.) (Diptera, Anthomyiidae) was investigated using egg counts and electrophysiological recordings from tarsal contact chemoreceptors. The glucosinolates present both inside and on the surface of cauliflower leaves were determined. The total amounts obtained with the two methods differed by a factor of 100. The extract of the leaf surface contained about 60 μg per g leaf extracted (gle), the total leaf extract 7.5 mg per gle. The glucosinolate patterns of the two extracts were qualitatively similar, but the ratios of the content of individual glucosinolates showed considerable differences. The D sensilla on segment 3 and 4 of the tarsus of D. radicum females were shown to contain a sensitive receptor cell for glucosinolates. In contrast, the receptor cells of the D sensilla of the other segments did not respond in a dose dependent way to these compounds. The glucosinolate receptors were found to be especially sensitive to glucobrassicin, gluconasturtiin and glucobrassicanapin with thresholds of about 10 −8M to 10 −9M. Large differences (up to two orders of magnitude) were observed among the different glucosinolates. A significant correlation was found between the behavioural discrimination index and the electrophysiological results. But no obvious correlation existed between the chemical nature of the glucosinolate side chain (e.g. indole, aromatic and aliphatic groups), and their stimulatory activity. However, a significant correlation was found between the overall length of the side chain and the biological activity. Although the flies discriminated clearly between model leaves with and without glucosinolates, a clear dose response curve was only obtained for the indole glucosinolate glucobrassicin. Since the most stimulatory fraction of the surface extract contained no glucosinolates, it was concluded that other compounds, in addition to glucosinolates, do play an important role for the stimulation of oviposition.

Abstract. Contact chemoreception plays a decisive role in host selection and oviposition behaviour of the cabbage root fly, Delia radicum L. (Diptera, Anthomyiidae). Glucosinolates (mustard oil glucosides) are known to be perceived by the flies, and when sprayed on paper leaf‐models induce oviposition. Recently it has become clear that other non‐volatile types of compounds must also be involved in host selection. A pair of ventro‐medial C sensilla on die fifth tarsomere respond strongly to a novel compound called tentatively ‘cabbage identification factor’ (CIF), but not to sucrose, glucose, fructose and proline. CDF is a new non‐glucosinolate oviposition stimulant. A single neurone in each sensillum is activated by this compound and the same is true for glucosinolates. In some flies a mixture of bom types of stimuli evoked an apparent mononeural spike train, whereas in odiers spikes of two separate cells were activated. The significance of this variability is not yet clear. The new stimulant, CIF, does not evoke responses in glucosinolate receptors in the D sensilla. The involvement of the C3 sensilla in the detection of host‐specific compounds constitutes the first known function for C sensilla in D. radicum. CIF appears to be present in leaf surface extracts from the host‐plant Brassica oleracea in quantities as low as 1 ng per gram leaf. In spite of this low level, it stimulates oviposition significantly better than glucobrassicin at higher concentrations, which up till now was known as the most powerful stimulant for D.radicum.

Two compounds present on the surface of Brassica oleracea cv. botrytis leaves have been isolated and identi®ed which stimulate very eectively oviposition in the cabbage root¯y, Delia radicum and which are perceived by a speci®c receptor neuron in the tarsal sensillum C 5 of the female¯y. Activity of extracts and chromatographic fractions were bioassayed, using oviposition experiments and mainly electrophysiological recordings from the C 5 tarsal contact chemoreceptor sensillum of femalē ies. Spectroscopic data indicate that the main compound is 1,2-dihydro-3-thia-4,10,10b-triaza-cyclopenta[.a.]¯uorene-1carboxylic acid, a novel compound related to Brassica phytoalexins like brassicanal C. It is accompanied by its glycine conjugate.

Summary. An oviposition-deterring pheromone (ODP) of the European cherry fruit fly Rhagoletis cerasi L. was isolated from faeces using cellulose and several reverse phase TLC and HPLC procedures. The biological activity was evaluated by means of behavior tests and by electrophysiological recordings from tarsal contact chemoreceptors. The compound was structurally characterized as a N[15(fl-glucopyranosyl)oxy-8-hydroxypalmitoyl]-taurine by spectroscopic means. The configurations of C-8 and C-15 of the fatty acid constituent remain to be established by synthetic work.

Current investigations concerning the identification of the chemical nature of the oviposition deterring pheromone of the European cherry fruit fly, Rhagoletis cerasi L., are conducted in an interdisciplinary research program by combining chemistry with behavioral evaluation. The methods used to collect and evaluate the pheromone by an improved semi‐quantitative behavior test are described. Zusammenfassung Eiablage‐hemmendes Markierungspheromon der Kirschenfliege Rhagoletis cerasi: Verhaltenstest zur Messung der Pheromonaktivität unter Laborbedingungen Nach einer einleitenden Übersicht über den heutigen Stand der Erkenntnisse auf dem Gebiet der eiablage‐hemmenden Pheromone (ODP) bei Fruchtfliegen und insbesondere der Kirschenfliege wird der verbesserte Verhaltenstest beschrieben, welcher für den halb‐quantitativen Nachweis von ODP‐Aktivität entwickelt worden ist. Im laufenden interdisziplinären Forschungsprogramm an der Eidg. Forschungsanstalt Wädenswil wird versucht, durch enge Zusammenarbeit zwischen Biologe, Chemiker und Elektrophysiologe das ODP der Kirschenfliege möglichst mit geringem Anteil an Verunreinigung einzusammeln, zu reinigen und einer chemischen Identifikation der ODP Komponenten zugänglich zu machen. Die Möglichkeiten und Grenzen des Verhaltenstests werden diskutiert und die Empfindlichkeit des Verfahrens mittels einer Konzentrationsreihe von Pheromonextrakt aufgezeigt.