The influence of differential stress on the permeability of a Lower Permian sandstone was investigated. Rock cylinders of 50 mm in diameter and 100 mm length of a fine-grained (mean grain size 0.2 mm), low-porosity (6-9%) sandstone were used to study the relation between differential stress, rock deformation, rock failure and hydraulic properties, with a focus on the changes of hydraulic properties in the pre-failure and failure region of triaxial rock deformation. The experiments were conducted at confining pressures up to 20 MPa, and axial force was controlled by lateral strain with a rate ranging from 10 )6 to 10 )7 sec )1 . While deforming the samples, permeability was determined by steady-state technique with a pressure gradient of 1 MPa over the specimen length and a fluid pressure level between 40 and 90% of the confining pressure. The results show that permeability of low-porosity sandstones under increasing triaxial stress firstly decreases due to compaction and starts to increase after the onset of dilatancy. This kind of permeability evolution is similar to that of crystalline rocks. A significant dependence of permeability evolution on strain rate was found. Comparison of permeability to volumetric strain demonstrates that the permeability increase after the onset of dilatancy is not sufficient to regain the initial permeability up to failure of the specimen. The initial permeability, which was determined in advance of the experiments, usually was regained in the post-failure region. After the onset of dilatancy, the permeability increase displays a linear dependence on volumetric strain.
For natural completions, well productivity is proportional to the depth of the perforation tunnels. Perforation depth, in turn, is generally inversely related to the formation effective stress. Accurate productivity modeling, therefore, requires accurate knowledge of the relationship between the downhole stress environment and perforation depth.A comprehensive experimental effort was recently conducted to evaluate the penetration performance of shaped charges into stressed Berea sandstone cores. Rock confining stress (σ c ) and pore fluid pressure (P p ) were varied from ambient to 10,000 psi, to simulate a range of downhole stress environments. This current work featured a broader and more systematic investigation of the influence of pore pressure than previous studies.Our experiments yielded the expected inverse correlation between penetration depth and effective stress (σ eff ). However, the data suggest a new definition of effective stress. Historically, the perforating community has defined σ eff = σ c -P p , but a new treatment (σ eff = σ c -aP p ; a=0.5) better fits present data. Furthermore, this new effective stress law better fits published historical penetration results. Pore pressure's influence on penetration depth is therefore weaker than previously thought; for a given confining stress, increasing pore pressure does increase penetration, but to a lesser extent than conventional models would indicate. The present work suggests that all shaped charges would be similarly affected.These findings are relevant to penetration modeling, and in turn to well productivity modeling and prediction. Further implications are to laboratory testing, regarding scaling of parameters to accurately simulate field conditions. This work culminates an initial application of combined penetration mechanics and geomechanics analyses to the investigation of shaped charge penetration into geologic materials. Future work will address different rock types, additional poroelastic quantities, and dynamic effects as they contribute to pressure-induced strengthening of reservoir rock.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.