Plasma concentrations of 25(OH)D decrease after an inflammatory insult and therefore are unlikely to be a reliable measure of 25(OH)D status in subjects with evidence of a significant systemic inflammatory response.
SummaryIn this prospective, randomised, double-blind study, we compared the effects of two dosage regimens. Pregnant patients at term were randomly assigned to two groups to be given diamorphine 0.4 mg in hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% 2.4 ml or diamorphine 0.4 mg in a volume of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% adjusted according to the patient's height and weight. Adequate anaesthesia was provided in all patients in both groups. The onset of the sensory block for cold and pinprick was faster with the fixed dose regimen (p = 0.01). There were more spinal blocks to above the first thoracic dermatome in the fixed dose group (17.1% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.022). Hypotension occurred in 71.7% vs. 50.0% of patients in the fixed dose and adjusted dose groups respectively (p = 0.035). In the fixed dose group, more patients required ephedrine to treat hypotension (79.5% vs. 56.8%, p = 0.022) and a larger median dose was administered (9 mg vs. 6 mg, p = 0.042). The decrease in mean (SD) arterial pressure was less in the adjusted group (35.0 (16.4) mmHg vs. 28.0 (13.5) mmHg, p = 0.036).
SummaryWe developed a screening questionnaire to be used by nurses to decide which patients should see an anaesthetist for further evaluation before the day of surgery. Our objective was to measure the accuracy of responses to the questionnaire. Agreement between questionnaire responses and the anaesthetist's assessment was assessed. For questions with a prevalence of 5 to 95%, the Kappa coefficient was used; percentage agreement was used for all other questions. Criterion validity was excellent ⁄ good for all questions with a prevalence between 5 and 95%, except for the question 'Do you have kidney disease?' For questions with prevalence < 5%, all demonstrated adequate criterion validity except the questions 'Has anyone in your family had a problem following an anaesthetic?' and 'If you have been put to sleep for an operation were there any anaesthetic problems?' Therefore, it is reasonable for nurses to use this questionnaire to determine which patients an anaesthetist should see before the day of surgery.Keywords Anaesthesia; pre-operative, assessment, questionnaire. Recent advances in anaesthetic and surgical practice have facilitated the growth of 'fast track' surgery [1, 2]. Careful outpatient assessment is fundamental to the success of this type of surgery and the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland now recommends assessment at a pre-operative assessment (POA) clinic [3].The provision of a pre-operative screening and assessment service at POA clinics supplies background information about patient's general medical status and fitness for anaesthesia. POA clinics improve patient care by allowing careful pre-operative evaluation and optimisation of coexisting disease [4], reduce costs [5, 6], improve efficiency [7], and lower surgical cancellation rates [8, 9].In POA clinics, nurses increasingly carry out preoperative screening [10]. Although they are not qualified to decide if a patient is fit for anaesthesia, they play a valuable role in identifying patients who are at risk and require further evaluation and optimisation before the day of surgery [11]. Nurses screen patients for risk factors for fitness for anaesthesia and surgery using questionnaires [12]. These can be self-administered by the patient [9], or used during structured interviews [13], or computer programs [14]. Although many locally developed questionnaires exist, few have been formally assessed.We have developed a multi-tiered screening questionnaire to be used by nurses to decide which patients should be seen at a POA clinic by an anaesthetist for further evaluation and optimisation. Using Delphi consensus methods, we have already evaluated content validity for each question [15] to ensure that the questions are relevant to concept being measured.Our objective was to perform item analysis of the screening questionnaire and measure criterion validity [16], that is, is it a true measure of what it is designed to measure?By testing individual questions beyond basic content validity, we were able to put them together in a...
O2 has haemodynamic effects in awake and anaesthetized patients. These effects were of overall similar magnitude for patients anaesthetized with propofol and sevoflurane.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.