This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-a-day terazosin (10 mg/day) in ambulatory patients (n = 57) with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). After a 4-week placebo lead-in and a 24-week treatment period with terazosin (both single-blind), 30 patients who responded to terazosin were randomly assigned to either the terazosin or placebo treatment group for 12 weeks.During the single-blind treatment period, the peak urine flow rate increased 54% from a baseline average of 7.76 ml/sec to 11.92 mYsec after terazosin; the mean flow rate increased 55% from a baseline of 4.90 ml/sec to 7.59 ml/sec; and the residual volume decreased 56% from 93.1 ml to 40.7 ml. The mean obstructive symptom score, irritative symptom score and physician's global assessment score improved by 68%. 34% and 27%, respectively. All these changes were significant (P < 0.05) when compared to baseline values.During the double-blind period, the improvement in all the variables was sustained in the terazosin group but not in the placebo group. Peak and mean urinary flow rates, and physician's global assessment showed significant ( P 5 0.05) differences at the end of the double-blind period. Adverse events occurred only during the single-blind period. The most frequent were headache (n = 6), asthenia (n = 3), and hypotension (n = 3).In summary, terazosin administered once-a-day improved the obstructive and irritative symptoms of BPH, urine flow rates and residual volume. Terazosin was well tolerated.

Weakening drinking-related reward memories by blocking their reconsolidation is a potential novel strategy for treating alcohol use disorders. However, few viable pharmacological options exist for reconsolidation interference in humans. We therefore examined whether the NMDA receptor antagonising gas, Nitrous Oxide (NO) could reduce drinking by preventing the post-retrieval restabilisation of alcohol memories in a group of hazardous drinkers. Critically, we focussed on whether prediction error (PE; a key determinant of reconsolidation) was experienced at retrieval. Sixty hazardous drinkers were randomised to one of three groups that retrieved alcohol memories either with negative PE (Retrieval + PE), no PE (Retrieval no PE) or non-alcohol memory retrieval with PE (No-retrieval +PE). All participants then inhaled 50% NO for 30 min. The primary outcome was change in beer consumption and alcohol cue-driven urge to drink from the week preceding manipulation (baseline) to the week following manipulation (test). The manipulation did not affect drinking following the intended retrieval+/- PE conditions However, a manipulation check, using a measure of subjective surprise, revealed that the group-level manipulation did not achieve the intended differences in PE at retrieval. Assessment of outcomes according to whether alcohol-relevant PE was actually experienced at retrieval, showed NO produced reductions in drinking in a retrieval and PE-dependent fashion. These preliminary findings highlight the importance of directly testing assumptions about memory reactivation procedures in reconsolidation research and suggest that NO should be further investigated as a potential reconsolidation-blocking agent.

This randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-a-day terazosin (10 mg/d) in ambulatory patients (n = 57) with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). After a 4-week placebo lead-in and a 24-week treatment period with terazosin (with both phases being single-blind), 30 patients who responded to terazosin were randomly assigned to either the terazosin or placebo treatment group for 12 weeks. During the single-blind treatment period, the peak urine flow rate increased 54% from a baseline average of 7.76 ml/s to 11.92 ml/s after terazosin administration; the mean flow rate increased 55% from a baseline of 4.90 ml/s to 7.59 ml/s; and the residual volume decreased 56% from 93.1 ml to 40.7 ml. The mean obstructive symptom score, irritative symptom score and physician global assessment score improved by 68%, 34% and 27%, respectively. All these changes were significant when compared with baseline values. During the double-blind period, the improvement in all the variables was sustained in the terazosin group but not in the placebo group. Peak and mean urinary flow rates, and physician assessment showed significant differences at the end of the double-blind period. Adverse events occurred only during the single-blind period. The most frequently experienced events were headache (n = 6), asthenia (n = 3) and hypotension (n = 3). A follow-up study that initially included 12 patients showed no significant loss of improvement in symptoms and no change in urodynamic parameters with the 5 mg terazosin dose at 1 year. At 2 years, the 9 remaining patients showed sustained improvement and no signs of tachyphylaxis.

A meta-analysis was performed on the results of clinical trials of buflomedil in intermittent claudication. The analysis used results from 744 patients enrolled in ten studies, conducted at 42 centers in seven countries. All studies were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials which measured improvement in "pain-free" walking distance by treadmill ergometry as the primary measure of efficacy. The meta-analysis results were based on "effect size", a standardized difference in mean response between buflomedil and placebo. Results demonstrated a statistically superior response to buflomedil compared with placebo, indicating that the average buflomedil treated patient was likely to have a greater improvement in walking distance than at least 60% of the placebo treated patients. Results were corroborated using various weighting schemes proportional to study quality ratings and sample sizes.