With the increasing prevalence of end stage renal disease there is a growing need for hemodialysis. Arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) are the preferred type of vascular access for hemodialysis but maturation and failure continue to present significant barriers to successful fistula use. AVF maturation integrates outward remodeling with vessel wall thickening in response to drastic hemodynamic changes, in the setting of uremia, systemic inflammation, oxidative stress and preexistent vascular pathology. AVF can fail due to both failure to mature adequately to support hemodialysis, as well as development of neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) that narrows the AVF lumen, typically near the fistula anastomosis. Failure due to NIH involves vascular cell activation and migration and extracellular matrix remodeling with complex interactions of growth factors, adhesion molecules, inflammatory mediators, and chemokines, all of which result in maladaptive remodeling. Different strategies have been proposed to prevent and treat AVF failure, based on current understanding of the modes and pathology of access failure; these approaches range from appropriate patient selection and use of alternative surgical strategies for fistula creation, to the use of novel interventional techniques or drugs to treat failing fistulae. Effective treatments to prevent or treat AVF failure requires a multidisciplinary approach involving nephrologists, vascular surgeons and interventional radiologists, allowing careful patient selection and the use of tailored systemic or localized interventions to improve patient-specific outcomes. This review provides contemporary information on the underlying mechanisms of AVF maturation and failure and discusses the broad spectrum of options that can be tailored for specific therapy.
Objective Arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) remain the optimal conduit for hemodialysis access but continue to demonstrate poor patency and poor rates of maturation. We hypothesized that CD44, a widely expressed cellular adhesion molecule that serves as a major receptor for extracellular matrix (ECM) components, promotes wall thickening and ECM deposition during AVF maturation. Approach and Results AVF were created via needle puncture in wild-type (WT) C57BL/6J and CD44 knockout (KO) mice. CD44 mRNA and protein expression was increased in WT AVF. CD44 KO mice showed no increase in AVF wall thickness (8.9 μm vs. 26.8 μm; P = 0.0114), collagen density, and hyaluronic acid density, but similar elastin density when compared to control AVF. CD44 KO mice also showed no increase in VCAM-1 expression, ICAM-1 expression and MCP-1 expression in the AVF compared to controls; there were also no increased M2 macrophage markers (TGM2: 81.5 fold, P = 0.0015; IL-10: 7.6 fold, P = 0.0450) in CD44 KO mice. Delivery of MCP-1 to CD44 KO mice rescued the phenotype with thicker AVF walls (27.2 μm vs. 14.7 μm; P = 0.0306), increased collagen density (2.4 fold; P = 0.0432), and increased number of M2 macrophages (2.1 fold; P = 0.0335). Conclusions CD44 promotes accumulation of M2 macrophages, ECM deposition and wall thickening during AVF maturation. These data show the association of M2 macrophages with wall thickening during AVF maturation and suggest that enhancing CD44 activity may be a strategy to increase AVF maturation.
Pericardial patches are commonly used during cardiovascular surgery to close blood vessels. In arteries, patches accumulate arterial progenitor cells; we hypothesized that venous patches would accumulate venous progenitor cells, in the absence of arterial pressure. We developed a novel rat inferior vena cava (IVC) venotomy model and repaired it with a pericardial patch. Cells infiltrated the patch to form a thick neointima by day 7; some cells were CD34+/VEGFR2+ and CD31+/Eph‐B4+ consistent with development of venous identity in the healing patch. Compared to arterial patches, the venous patches had increased neointimal thickness at day 7 without any pseudoaneurysms. Addition of an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) to increase blood flow on the patch resulted in reduced patch neointimal thickness and proliferation, but neointimal thickness was not reversible with AVF ligation. These results show that rat patch venoplasty is a novel model of aggressive venous neointimal hyperplasia.
Objective— Arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) are the most common access created for hemodialysis; however, many AVF fail to mature and require repeated intervention, suggesting a need to improve AVF maturation. Eph-B4 (ephrin type-B receptor 4) is the embryonic venous determinant that is functional in adult veins and can regulate AVF maturation. Cav-1 (caveolin-1) is the major scaffolding protein of caveolae—a distinct microdomain that serves as a mechanosensor at the endothelial cell membrane. We hypothesized that Cav-1 function is critical for Eph-B4–mediated AVF maturation. Approach and Results— In a mouse aortocaval fistula model, both Cav-1 mRNA and protein were increased in the AVF compared with control veins. Cav-1 KO (knockout) mice showed increased fistula wall thickening ( P =0.0005) and outward remodeling ( P <0.0001), with increased eNOS (endothelial NO synthase) activity compared with WT (wild type) mice. Ephrin-B2/Fc inhibited AVF outward remodeling in WT mice but not in Cav-1 KO mice and was maintained in Cav-1 RC (Cav-1 endothelial reconstituted) mice (WT, P =0.0001; Cav-1 KO, P =0.7552; Cav-1 RC, P =0.0002). Cavtratin—a Cav-1 scaffolding domain peptide—decreased AVF wall thickness in WT mice and in Eph-B4 het mice compared with vehicle alone (WT, P =0.0235; Eph-B4 het, P =0.0431); cavtratin also increased AVF patency (day 42) in WT mice ( P =0.0275). Conclusions— Endothelial Cav-1 mediates Eph-B4–mediated AVF maturation. The Eph-B4-Cav-1 axis regulates adaptive remodeling during venous adaptation to the fistula environment. Manipulation of Cav-1 function may be a translational strategy to enhance AVF patency.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.