SummaryThis longitudinal study of travellers to Africa taking mefloquine ( M Q ) chemoprophylaxis aimed to quantify and assess non-serious adverse events (AE) occurring during short-term prophylaxis and relate these to concentrations of racemic MQ, its enantiomers and metabolite. A total of 420 volunteers ( 5 2 % F) participated. AEs with some impact on activities were reported by I I .2% of participants including 7.9 % of neurological/psychiatric symptoms. Women were more likely to report AEs (P=0.02). The standardized questionnaires used showed more pathological indicators in travellers who reported subjective AE with significantly more dizziness, distress, sleep disturbances and a high total mood disturbance (TMD) in the AE group. There was, however, no significant performance deficit in computerized psychomotor tests in those experiencing AE. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in enantiomer ratios, metabolite concentrations, or racemic M Q levels in participants with or without AEs suggesting that these factors are not the main predictors of mefloquine intolerability. keywords mefloquine, adverse event correspondence

Under the conditions of this study, food increases the rate and the extent of mefloquine absorption. It is reasonable to recommend that mefloquine be administered with food in travellers receiving chemoprophylaxis and in patients on recovery receiving curative treatment. In acutely ill patients, mefloquine should be taken as soon as possible and administration with or shortly after meals should be attempted as soon as feasible.

No abstract

Background: In febrile neutropenic patients, ceftriaxone plus an aminoglycoside is effective for the treatment of infection, while filgrastim reduces the extent and duration of neutropenia. Because the once daily dosing regimen of this combination permits ambulatory treatment, there is a need to test criteria for early hospital discharge. Methods: Hospitalized adult patients with febrile neutropenia (following chemotherapy) considered to be potentially treatable on a follow-up out-patient basis were entered into this open-label, multinational study. Patients received a once daily combination of ceftriaxone for ≥5 days, aminoglycoside for ≥2 days, and filgrastim until the absolute neutrophil count was ≥1.0 × 10⁹/l for 2 days. Those initially responding to therapy (reduction of fever by ≥1°C within 72 h, and clinical improvement) were randomized into standard in-patient or follow-up out-patient treatment groups, the latter patients being discharged from hospital early, after meeting defined criteria. Results: 105 patients were enrolled, of whom 21 initial non-responders were not randomized. Efficacy was evaluable in 80 patients. Success (resolution of fever and symptoms, maintained for 7 days after cessation of therapy, and eradication of infecting pathogens) was similar among in-patients (40/42, 95%) and out-patients (34/38, 89%). The duration of hospitalization was shorter for out-patients than in-patients (median of 4 vs. 6 days, respectively). No hospital readmissions were necessary in out-patients. All other efficacy parameters assessed were comparable in both groups, as was tolerability/safety. One potentially drug-related death was reported. Conclusions: Patients who satisfy prospectively defined criteria for early discharge can be treated safely on an out-patient basis with a regimen of once daily ceftriaxone plus an aminoglycoside with filgrastim. In addition to reducing healthcare costs, it may improve patients’ quality of life.

In murine malaria the addition of mefloquine to sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine has been shown to exert an additive effect and to significantly slow the emergence of resistance to the individual components. In a pilot study carried out in Gabon, a reduced dosage of the triple combination with a mean of 1 mg/kg of mefloquine/2 mg/kg of sulfadoxine/0.1 mg/kg of pyrimethamine (Fansimef; Roche, Basel, Switzerland) had previously been shown to achieve high cure rates in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. To evaluate the additive effect, a randomized, doubleblind trial in school children with mild P. falciparum malaria was performed in Gabon. Two hundred thirty-one patients evaluated received a single dose of either the triple combination with a mean of 1.07 mg/kg of mefloquine/ 2.14 mg/kg of sulfadoxine/0.11 mg/kg of pyrimethamine (group MSP), or 1.07 mg/kg of mefloquine alone (group M), or 2.14 mg/kg of sulfadoxine/0.11 mg/kg of pyrimethamine alone (group SP). In the MSP group and the SP group, 67% and 69% of the patients were parasitologically cured, respectively, compared with only 13% in the M group (P Ͻ 0.001). A significantly higher parasitemia was found in the M group compared with the MSP group or the SP group on days 2 and 3 after the start of treatment. The high efficacy of the low dose sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine regimen was the most surprising finding of this study.