Over the past five years evidence has mounted that long-duration (> 2 s) γ-ray bursts (GRBs) the most brilliant of all astronomical explosionssignal the collapse of massive stars in our Universe. This evidence was originally based on the probable association of one unusual GRB with a supernova 1 , but now includes the association of GRBs with regions of massive star formation in distant galaxies 2,3 , the appearance of supernova-like 'bumps' in the optical afterglow light curves of several bursts 4-6 and lines of freshly synthesized elements in the spectra of a few X-ray afterglows 7 . These observations support, but do not yet conclusively demonstrate, the idea that long-duration GRBs are associated with the deaths of massive stars, presumably arising from core collapse. Here we report evidence that

No abstract

No abstract

It is thought that the first generations of massive stars in the Universe were an important, and quite possibly dominant 1 , source of the ultra-violet radiation that reionized the hydrogen gas in the intergalactic medium (IGM); a state in which it has remained to the present day. Measurements of cosmic microwave background anisotropies suggest that this phase-change largely took place 2 in the redshift range z=10.8 ±1.4, while observations of quasars and Lyman-α galaxies have shown that the process was essentially completed 3,4,5 by z≈6. However, the detailed history of reionization, and characteristics of the stars and proto-galaxies that drove it, remain unknown. Further progress in understanding requires direct observations of the sources of ultra-violet radiation in the era of reionization, and mapping the evolution of the neutral hydrogen (H I) fraction through time. The detection of galaxies at such redshifts is highly challenging, due to their intrinsic faintness and high luminosity distance, whilst bright quasars appear to be rare It has long been recognised that GRBs have the potential to be powerful probes of the early universe. Known to be the end product of rare massive stars 11 , GRBs and their afterglows can briefly outshine any other source in the universe, and would be theoretically detectable to z ~ 20 and beyond 12,13 . Their association with individual stars means that they serve as a signpost of star formation, even if their host galaxies are too 5 faint to detect directly. Equally important, precise determination of the hydrogen Lyman-α absorption profile can provide a measure of the neutral fraction of the IGM at the location of the burst 9,10,14,15 . With multiple GRBs at z > 7, and hence lines of sight through the IGM, we could thus trace the process of reionization from its early stages.However, until now the highest redshift GRBs (at z = 6. Ground-based optical observations in the r, i and z filters starting within a few minutes of the burst revealed no counterpart at these wavelengths (see Supplementary Information (SI)).The United Kingdom Infrared Telescope (UKIRT) in Hawaii responded to an automated request, and began observations in the K-band 21 minutes post burst. These images ( Figure 1) revealed a point source at the reported X-ray position, which we concluded was likely to be the afterglow of the GRB. We also initiated further nearinfrared (NIR) observations using the Gemini-North 8-m telescope, which started 75 min after the burst, and showed that the counterpart was only visible in filters redder than about 1.2 µm. In this range the afterglow was relatively bright and exhibited a shallow spectral slope F ν ∝ ν -0.26 , in contrast to the deep limit on any flux in the Y filter (0.97-1.07 µm). Later observations from Chile using the MPI/ESO 2.2m telescope, Gemini South and the Very Large Telescope (VLT) confirmed this finding. The nondetection in the Y-band implies a power-law spectral slope between Y and J steeper than. This is impossible for dust at any redshift, and is a tex...

3It is now accepted that long duration γ-ray bursts (GRBs) are produced during the collapse of a massive star 1,2 . 11,12 . GRB 060505 was a faint burst with a duration of 4 s. GRB 060614 had a duration of 102 s and a pronounced hard to soft evolution. Both were rapidly localised by Swift's X-ray telescope (XRT). Subsequent follow-up of these bursts led to the discovery of their optical afterglows, locating them in galaxies at low redshift: GRB 060505 at z = 0.089 13 and GRB 060614 at z = 0.125 14,15 . The relative proximity of these bursts engendered an expectation that a bright SN would be discovered a few days after the bursts, as had been found just a few months before in 4 another low-redshift Swift burst, GRB 060218 (z = 0.033) 9 , and in all previous wellobserved nearby bursts 1,5-8 .We monitored the afterglows of GRB 060505 and 060614 using a range of telescopes (see supplementary material for details). These led to early detections of the afterglows. We continued the monitoring campaign and obtained stringent upper limits on any re-brightening at the position of the optical afterglows up to 12 and 5 weeks after the bursts, respectively. The light-curves obtained based on this monitoring are shown in Fig. 1. For GRB 060505 we detected the optical afterglow at a single epoch. All subsequent observations resulted in deep upper limits. For GRB 060614 we followed the decay of the optical afterglow in the R-band up to four nights after the burst. In later observations no source was detected to deep limits (see also 14,15 for independent studies of this event). As seen in Fig. 1, the upper limits are far below the level seen in previous SNe, in particular previous SNe associated with long-duration GRBs 5-9 . For both GRBs A concern in any attempt to uncover a SN associated with a GRB is the presence of a poorly quantified level of extinction along the line of sight. In these cases however,we are fortunate that the levels of Galactic extinction in both directions are very low,. In the case of GRB 060505, our spatially resolved spectroscopy of the host galaxy allows us to use the Balmer emission line ratios to limit the dust obscuration 5 at the location of the burst. The Balmer line ratio is consistent with no internal reddening. In the case of GRB 060614, the detection of the early afterglow in many bands, including the Swift UV bands UVW1 and UVW2 17 , rules out significant obscuration of the source in the host galaxy and we conclude that there is no significant dust obscuration in either case (see also 15 ).Both GRBs were located in star-forming galaxies. The host galaxy of GRB 060505 has an absolute magnitude of about M B = -19.6 and the spectrum displays the prominent emission lines typically seen in star-forming galaxies. The 2-dimensional spectrum shows that the host galaxy emission seen at the position of the afterglow is due to a compact H II region in a spiral arm of the host (see the supplementary material for details). We estimate a star-formation rate of 1 M  yr −1 and a specific rate of about 4T...

We present an optical flux vs. X-ray flux diagram for all known gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) for which an X-ray afterglow has been detected. We propose an operational definition of dark bursts as those bursts that are optically subluminous with respect to the fireball model, i.e., which have an optical-to-X-ray spectral index beta_OX < 0.5. Out of a sample of 52 GRBs we identify 5 dark bursts. The definition and diagram serve as a simple and quick diagnostic tool for identifying dark GRBs based on limited information, particularly useful for early and objective identification of dark GRBs observed with the Swift satellite.Comment: 4 pages, 1 figure. ApJ Letters, in pres

Abstract. We study a magnitude-limited sample of 10 gamma-ray burst (GRB) host galaxies with known spectroscopic redshifts (0.43 < z < 2.04). From an analysis of the spectral energy distributions (SEDs), based on published broad-band optical and near-infrared photometry, we derive photometric redshifts, galaxy types, ages of the dominant stellar populations, internal extinctions, and ultraviolet (UV) star-formation rates (SFRs) of the host galaxies. The photometric redshifts are quite accurate despite the heterogeneous nature of the sample: the rms errors are σ(z) = 0.21 and σ(∆z/(1 + z spec )) = 0.16 with no significant systematic offsets. All the host galaxies have SEDs similar to young starburst galaxies with moderate to low extinction. A comparison of specific SFRs with those of high-redshift galaxies in the Hubble Deep Fields shows that GRB hosts are most likely similar to the field galaxies with the largest specific SFRs. On the other hand, GRB hosts are not significantly younger than starburst field galaxies at similar redshifts, but are found to be younger than a sample of all types of field galaxies.

15131514 KANN ET AL.Vol. 720 ABSTRACT We have gathered optical photometry data from the literature on a large sample of Swift-era gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglows including GRBs up to 2009 September, for a total of 76 GRBs, and present an additional three pre-Swift GRBs not included in an earlier sample. Furthermore, we publish 840 additional new photometry data points on a total of 42 GRB afterglows, including large data sets for GRBs 050319, 050408, 050802, 050820A, 050922C, 060418, 080413A, and 080810. We analyzed the light curves of all GRBs in the sample and derived spectral energy distributions for the sample with the best data quality, allowing us to estimate the host-galaxy extinction. We transformed the afterglow light curves into an extinction-corrected z = 1 system and compared their luminosities with a sample of pre-Swift afterglows. The results of a former study, which showed that GRB afterglows clustered and exhibited a bimodal distribution in luminosity space, are weakened by the larger sample. We found that the luminosity distribution of the two afterglow samples (Swift-era and pre-Swift) is very similar, and that a subsample for which we were not able to estimate the extinction, which is fainter than the main sample, can be explained by assuming a moderate amount of line-of-sight host extinction. We derived bolometric isotropic energies for all GRBs in our sample, and found only a tentative correlation between the prompt energy release and the optical afterglow luminosity at 1 day after the GRB in the z = 1 system. A comparative study of the optical luminosities of GRB afterglows with echelle spectra (which show a high number of foreground absorbing systems) and those without, reveals no indication that the former are statistically significantly more luminous. Furthermore, we propose the existence of an upper ceiling on afterglow luminosities and study the luminosity distribution at early times, which was not accessible before the advent of the Swift satellite. Most GRBs feature afterglows that are dominated by the forward shock from early times on. Finally, we present the first indications of a class of long GRBs, which form a bridge between the typical highluminosity, high-redshift events and nearby low-luminosity events (which are also associated with spectroscopic supernovae) in terms of energetics and observed redshift distribution, indicating a continuous distribution overall.