Background The optimal timing of elective surgery in diverticulitis remains unclear. We attempted to investigate early elective versus late elective laparoscopic surgery in acute recurrent diverticulitis in a retrospective study. Method Data of patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery for diverticulitis were retrospectively gathered, including Hinchey stages I-II a/b. The primary endpoint was in-hospital complications according to the ClavienDindo classification. Secondary endpoints were surgical complications, operative time, conversion rate, and length of hospital stay. Results Of 237 patients, 81 (34%) underwent early elective operation (group A) and 156 (66%) underwent late elective operation (group B). In-hospital complications developed in 32% in group A and in 34% in group B (risk difference 2%, 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI): -11%, 14%). Higher age (p = 0.048) and borderline higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score (p = 0.056) were risk factors for in-hospital complications. Severe surgical complications occurred in 9% of patients in group A and 10% in group B (risk difference 2%, 95% CI: -6%, 9%). Conversion rate was 9% in group A and 3% in group B (p = 0.070). Severity of disease did not seem to have an impact on complications or length of hospital stay. The median postoperative hospital stay was 8 days in both groups (interquartile range 6-10). Mean operative time was 220 min (SD 64) in group A and 202 min (SD 48) in group B. Conclusions This is the first study comparing early versus late elective surgery for diverticulitis in terms of the postoperative outcome using a validated classification. Although the retrospective setting and large confidence intervals don't allow definitive recommendations, these results are of utmost importance for the design of future prospective, randomized controlled trials.

Colonic resection for ischemic colitis is associated with high in-hospital mortality, especially in patients with right-sided or pan-colonic ischemia. In patients developing acidosis, early laparotomy is essential. Since resection margins' affection seems to be underestimated upon surgery, resections should be performed wide enough within healthy tissue.

tcMEP/SSEP monitoring has proved to be an excellent means of detecting spinal cord ischaemia during surgery on thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. The prognostic value of tcMEP monitoring should be considered superior to that of SSEP measurements, because of its direct and rapid response to spinal malperfusion. Through combined neurophysiological monitoring, vital parameter balancing and intraoperative interventions, spinal cord perfusion improves and recovery of tcMEP and SSEP is achievable, reducing the prevalence of postoperative paraplegia.

TcMEP loss is associated with spinal cord ischaemia, causing postoperative paraplegia. TcMEP monitoring is an excellent method to detect spinal cord ischaemia at an early stage.

TcMEP and SSEP allow an adequate, direct, and reliable intraoperative assessment of spinal cord function, enabling the surgeon to diagnose an impending ischaemia and act accordingly. This measurement technique provides the surgical team with a means of integrating neurological aspects during thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair.