Discussion. The ecotoxicological effects of pesticides can be assessed by monitoring the status of communities in real ecosystems or through the use of laboratory toxicity tests. Litterbag field test showed no influence of the treatments on the organic matter breakdown, suggesting a scarce contribution of soil macrofauna. The bait-lamina test, however, seemed to be useful for detecting the effects of GLY and CPF treatments on the activity of the soil fauna. CPF failed to give significant differences with the controls in the reproduction test and the results were not conclusive in the avoidance test. Although the field population density of earthworms could be affected by multiple factors, the effects observed on the reproduction and avoidance tests caused by GLY could contribute to its decrease, with the subsequent loss of their beneficial functions. Biomarkers measuring effects on suborganism level could be useful to predict adverse effects on soil organisms and populations. Among them, NRRT, a lysosomal destabilization biomarker, resulted in demonstrating more sensitivity than the reproduction and avoidance tests. The Comet assay was responsive only to CPF. Since DNA damage can have severe consequences on populations, it could be regarded as an important indicator to be used in the assessment of soil health. Conclusions.Reproduction and avoidance tests were sensitive indicators of GLY exposure, with the former being more labor intensive. Bait-lamina test was sensitive to both CPF and GLY. NRRT and Comet assays revealed alterations at a subcellular level, and could be considered complementary to the biological activity tests. Because of their simplicity, some of these bioassays seemed to be appropriate pre-screening tests, prior to more extensive and invasive testing.Recommendations and Perspectives. This study showed deleterious effects of GLY and CPF formulations when applied at the nominal concentrations recommended for soya crops. Further validation is needed before these endpoints could be used as field monitoring tools in Argentine soya soils (ecotoxicological risk assessment -ERA tools).

The Global Horizon Scanning Project (GHSP) is an innovative initiative that aims to identify important global environmental quality research needs. Here we report 20 key research questions from Latin America (LA). Members of the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) LA and other scientists from LA were asked to submit research questions that would represent priority needs to address in the region. One hundred questions were received, then partitioned among categories, examined, and some rearranged during a workshop in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Twenty priority research questions were subsequently identified. These research questions included developing, improving, and harmonizing across LA countries methods for 1) identifying contaminants and degradation products in complex matrices (including biota); 2) advancing prediction of contaminant risks and effects in ecosystems, addressing lab‐to‐field extrapolation challenges, and understanding complexities of multiple stressors (including chemicals and climate change); and 3) improving management and regulatory tools toward achieving sustainable development. Whereas environmental contaminants frequently identified in these key questions were pesticides, pharmaceuticals, endocrine disruptors or modulators, plastics, and nanomaterials, commonly identified environmental challenges were related to agriculture, urban effluents, solid wastes, pulp and paper mills, and natural extraction activities. Several interesting research topics included assessing and preventing pollution impacts on conservation protected areas, integrating environment and health assessments, and developing strategies for identification, substitution, and design of less hazardous chemicals (e.g., green chemistry). Finally, a recurrent research need included developing an understanding of differential sensitivity of regional species and ecosystems to environmental contaminants and other stressors. Addressing these critical questions will support development of long‐term strategic research efforts to advance more sustainable environmental quality and protect public health and the environment in LA. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2018;14:344–357. © 2018 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC)

No abstract

No abstract

-The objective of this work was to evaluate the effects of chlorpyrifos on earthworms and on soil functional parameters. An integrated laboratory-fi eld study was performed in a wheat fi eld in Argentina, sprayed with chlorpyrifos at two recommended application rates (240 or 960 g ha -1 a.i.). Laboratory tests included neutral red retention time, comet assay (single cell gel electrophoresis), and avoidance behavior, each using the earthworm Eisenia andrei exposed in soil collected 1 or 14 days after pesticide application, and the bait-lamina test. Field tests assessed organic matter breakdown using the litterbag and bait-lamina assays. Earthworm populations in the fi eld were assessed using formalin application and hand-sorting. The neutral red retention time and comet assays were sensitive biomarkers to the effects of chlorpyrifos on the earthworm E. andrei; however, the earthworm avoidance test was not suffi ciently robust to assess these effects. Feeding activity of soil biota, assessed by the bait lamina test, was signifi cantly inhibited by chlorpyrifos after 97 days, but recovered by the 118 th day of the test. Litterbag test showed no signifi cant differences in comparison to controls. Earthworm abundance in the fi eld was too low to adequately test the sensitivity of this assessment endpoint.Index terms: Eisenia andrei, agricultural soil, fi eld assay, laboratory bioassay. Biomarcadores para a avaliação dos efeitos de clorpirifós em minhocas e em parâmetros funcionais do soloResumo -O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar os efeitos do clorpirifós sobre as minhocas e sobre parâmetros funcionais do solo. Foi executado um estudo integrado campo-laboratório, em uma plantação de trigo na Argentina, onde foi aplicado clorpirifós em duas doses recomendadas (240 ou 960 g ha -1 a.i.). Os ensaios laboratoriais incluíram tempo de retenção do vermelho-neutro, ensaio cometa (eletroforese em gel de célula única) e teste de fuga, cada um com a minhoca Eisenia andrei exposta aos solos coletados 1 e 14 dias após tratamentos, e teste com a lâmina-isca. Nos bioensaios de campo, avaliou-se a decomposição da matéria orgânica em sacolas com alfafa e com a lâmina-isca. As populações de minhocas foram avaliadas no campo com uso do método de extração com formalina e remoção manual. O tempo de retenção do vermelho-neutro e o ensaio cometa foram biomarcadores sensíveis aos efeitos do clorpirifós na minhoca E. andrei; porém, o comportamento de fuga não foi efi ciente para avaliar tais efeitos. A atividade alimentar da biota do solo, avaliada pelo teste de lâmina-isca, foi signifi cativamente inibida pelo clorpirifós após 97 dias, mas recuperou-se no 118 o dia do teste. O teste de sacolas com alfafa não mostrou diferenças signifi cativas em comparação aos controles. A abundância das minhocas em campo foi muito baixa, para testar adequadamente a sensibilidade desta variável.Termos para indexação: Eisenia andrei, solos agrícolas, testes de campo, bioensaios de laboratório.

No abstract

No abstract

The effects of mixtures of nanoparticles (NPs) and other chemicals have been poorly studied in terrestrial invertebrates. In this study, we investigated the effects of binary mixtures of goethite (α-FeOOH) NPs and metallic (Cd and Pb) or organic (chlorpyrifos, CPF) contaminants in Eisenia andrei earthworms. We used the filter paper contact test to evaluate (i) the uptake of NPs in organisms exposed to the mixtures of NPs+Metals and NPs+CPF and (ii) the potential effects of the mixture of NPs+CPF on the CPF-induced inhibition of the biomarker enzymes acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and carboxylesterases (CES). We used the artificial soil test to deepen the study on joint effects of NPs+CPF. All compounds were applied separately and in binary mixtures. In the single exposure treatment, Fe levels decreased significantly in organisms exposed to NPs on filter paper, suggesting systemic effects aimed at eliminating Fe incorporated through NPs. Conversely, earthworms exposed to binary mixtures showed Fe levels similar (NPs+Metals) to or higher (NPs+CPF) than controls. The earthworms single exposed to NPs presented no changes in AChE and CES activities. In the artificial soil test, the only treatment that showed AChE inhibition after 72 h was single CPF exposure, while no significant changes were observed in CES activity. However, after 7-day exposure in artificial soil or 72-h exposure on filter paper, the mixture of NPs+CPF induced a similar degree of AChE and CES inhibition as single CPF exposure. All these suggested that NPs did not produce neurotoxic effects, and that the inhibition of the enzymes' activities in all cases was due to the presence of the pesticide. On the other hand, the differences in the pattern of Fe accumulation in the earthworms indicate that the presence of other contaminants in the exposure media can modify the uptake and/or the excretion of Fe and evidence the interactions that may be found in binary mixtures of metal oxide NPs and other pre-existing contaminants in the soil ecosystem.