Patients can acutely deteriorate unexpectedly. Junior medical officers (JMOs) are often first to review patients who become unwell. Opportunities to escalate care to a senior colleague may exist prior to the need for a rapid response team review. Little is known about the factors that influence JMO decisions to escalate care. In this study, our objective was to investigate the self-reported factors that influence escalation of care by JMOs in a university-affiliated, tertiary level hospital. We designed a face-to-face questionnaire of JMOs using standardised introduction to minimise interviewer bias. Fifty JMOs participated in the study (a 100% response rate). Most (63.3%) felt that they would be able to identify a clinically deteriorating patient. They would be more likely to escalate care if they were not familiar with the patient's clinical problem. If handover plans were seen to be adequate, JMOs felt it was less necessary to escalate care. Few JMOs (12%) agreed that they limited escalation due to fear of criticism or fear of conflict with senior medical staff. Although 36% agreed that they were concerned about waking seniors overnight, only 6% feared that escalating care overnight would affect their future career prospects. Escalation of care appears to be mostly influenced by the confidence and familiarity of the JMO with the cause of deterioration. JMOs identified clear handover with documented goals of treatment and suggested actions in event of clinical deterioration as the best means by which to improve the process of escalation of care for clinically deteriorating patients.
o f P e d i a t r i c s , S a l t Lake C i t y , Utah. A s p a r t of an Outreach program t o determine t h e need f o r cont i n u i n g medical and nursing education, a c h a r t review of highr i s k newborns i n community h o s p i t a l s was undertaken. P a r t o f t h e study evaluated recording of Apgar s c o r e s and i n i t i a l r e s u s c i t at i o n i n t h e d e l i v e r y room, assuming t h i s c r i t i c a l period f o r 3 i n f a n t warrants compliance with accepted r e s u s c i t a t i v e s t a n d a r d s followed by complete documentation i n t h e r e c o r d . 410 c h a r t s of h i g h -r i s k i n f a n t s born i n 6 community h o s p i t a l s ( 2 Level 11, 4 Level I ) have been reviewed. The h i g h -r i s k population includes LBW i n f a n t s , n e o n a t a l d e a t h s , n e o n a t a l t r a n s f e r s and admissions t o Level I 1 ICU. Preliminary review i n d i c a t e s inadequate recording of i n i t i a l assessment and r e s u s c i t a t i v e e f f o r t s following t h e b i r t h o f t h e s e h i g h -r i s k i n f a n t s . 92.7% o f a l l c h a r t s had incomp l e t e r e c o r d s of r e s u s c i t a t i v e measures. Absence o f o r incomplete r e c o r d i n g of Apgar s c o r e s was observed i n 16.1% o f c h a r t s . Both 1 and 5 min Apgar s c o r e s were recorded i n 83.9% of c h a r t s ( 3 4 4 ) . Of t h e s e i n f a n t s a t o t a l of 77.3% had an a c c e p t a b l e Apgar ( > 6 ) by 5 min. This number seems t o i n d i c a t e t h a t compliance with r e s u s c i t a t i o n s t a n d a r d s may occur b u t , due t o lack of documentat i o n i n p a t i e n t s ' c h a r t s , i t is d i f f i c u l t t o e v a l u a t e . I t i s apparent t h e r e i s need f o r continued outreach education, t o i nc r e a s e n u r s e s ' and p h y s i c i a n s ' awareness of t h e importance of documentation of t h i s c r i t i c a l period. Only when documentation of r e s u s c i t a t i o n i s complete can t r u e compliance of r e s u s c l t a t i v e measures with accepted s t a n d a r d s be a s s e s s e d .5 REfCUlIhG ADWjSlON ' 10 IIUSPITAI. I N PfllIAI'RIC NIhC PKXXL4'4S. Jane 11. Ferguson, .Joel .J. A l p e r t , on U. Sch. Med., Boston C i t y l l o s p i t a l , Dcpt. Ped. BostonThe d e c i s i o n t o admit a p a t i e n t t o h o s p i t a l i n p e d i a t r i c t r a i r ing programs is o f t e n made by h o u s e s t a f f . Many i n s t i t u t~o n s havc developed r u l e s t o h e l p h o u s e s t a f f avoid missing an i n d i c a t e d a dmission. To determine how common n l l e s a r e , a survey was c a r r i c~ o u t by mailed q u e s t i o m l i r c o f t h e 434 liosl,itals t h a t makc ul, thc 284 US Pediatric T r a i n i n g Programs. 48 h o s p i t a l s were elimirmtec from t h e sample l a r g e l y because o f d u p l i c a t i o n . 8?%(318) of t h e 386 surveyed r e p l i e d and r e l w r t e d 910 r u l e s o r a n average of 6.11 h o s p i t a l w i t h a range of 1-78. 47",151) of t h e h o s p i t a l s ...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.