The persistence of the broad-spectrum antiparasitic activity of endectocide compounds relies on their disposition kinetics and pattern of plasma/tissues exchange in the host. This study evaluates the comparative plasma disposition kinetics of ivermectin (IVM), moxidectin (MXD) and doramectin (DRM) in cattle treated with commercially available injectable formulations. Twelve (12) parasite-free male Hereford calves (180-210 kg) grazing on pasture were allocated into three groups of four animals each. Animals in each group received either IVM (Ivomec 1%, MSD AGVET, Rahway, NJ, USA), MXD (Cydectin 1%. American Cyanamid, Wayne, NJ, USA) or DRM (Dectomax 1%, Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA) by subcutaneous injection at a dose of 200 micrograms/kg. Jugular blood samples were collected from 1 h up to 80 days post-treatment, and plasma extracted, derivatized and analysed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using fluorescence detection. The parent molecules were detected in plasma between 1 h and either 70 (DRM) or 80 (IVM and MXD) days post-treatment. The absorption of MXD from the site of injection was significantly faster (absorption half-life (t1/2ab) = 1.32 h) than those of IVM (t1/2ab = 39.2 h) and DRM (t1/2ab = 56.4 h). MXD peak plasma concentration (Cmax) was reached significantly earlier (8.00 h) compared to those of IVM and DRM (4-6 days post-treatment). There were no differences on Cmax values: the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was higher for IVM (459 ng.d/mL) and DRM (627 ng.d/mL) compared to that of MXD (217 ng.d/mL). The mean plasma residence time was longer for MXD (14.6 d) compared to IVM (7.35 d) and DRM (9.09 d). Unidentified metabolites were detected in plasma: they accounted for 5.75% (DRM), 8.50% (IVM) and 13.8% (MXD) of the total amount of their respective parent drugs recovered in plasma. The comparative plasma disposition kinetics of IVM, MXD and DRM in cattle, characterized over 80 days post-treatment under standardized experimental conditions, is reported for the first time.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

BackgroundScabies is one of the commonest dermatological conditions globally; however it is a largely underexplored and truly neglected infectious disease. Foremost, improvement in the management of this public health burden is imperative. Current treatments with topical agents and/or oral ivermectin (IVM) are insufficient and drug resistance is emerging. Moxidectin (MOX), with more advantageous pharmacological profiles may be a promising alternative.Methodology/Principal FindingsUsing a porcine scabies model, 12 pigs were randomly assigned to receive orally either MOX (0.3 mg/kg once), IVM (0.2 mg/kg twice) or no treatment. We evaluated treatment efficacies by assessing mite count, clinical lesions, pruritus and ELISA-determined anti-S. scabiei IgG antibodies reductions. Plasma and skin pharmacokinetic profiles were determined. At day 14 post-treatment, all four MOX-treated but only two IVM-treated pigs were mite-free. MOX efficacy was 100% and remained unchanged until study-end (D47), compared to 62% (range 26–100%) for IVM, with one IVM-treated pig remaining infected until D47. Clinical scabies lesions, pruritus and anti-S. scabiei IgG antibodies had completely disappeared in all MOX-treated but only 75% of IVM-treated pigs. MOX persisted ~9 times longer than IVM in plasma and skin, thereby covering the mite’s entire life cycle and enabling long-lasting efficacy.Conclusions/SignificanceOur data demonstrate that oral single-dose MOX was more effective than two consecutive IVM-doses, supporting MOX as potential therapeutic approach for scabies.