Forty-eight Pelibuey×Katahdin male intact lambs (23.87±2.84 kg) were used in an 84-d feeding trial, with six pens per treatment in a 2×2 factorial design arrangement. The aim of the study was to evaluate the interaction of two dietary energy levels (3.05 and 2.83 Mcal/kg ME) and two dietary protein levels (17.5% and 14.5%) on growth performance, dietary energetics and carcass traits. The dietary treatments used were: i) High protein-high energy (HP-HE); ii) High protein-low energy (HP-LE); iii) Low protein-high energy (LP-HE), and iv) Low protein-low energy (LP-LE). With a high-energy level, dry matter intake (DMI) values were 6.1% lower in the low-protein diets, while with low-energy, the DMI values did not differ between the dietary protein levels. Energy levels did not influence the final weight and average daily gain (ADG), but resulted in lower DMI values and higher gain efficiencies. No effects of protein level were detected on growth performance. The observed dietary net energy (NE) ratio and observed DMI were closer than expected in all treatments and were not affected by the different treatments. There was an interaction (p<0.03) between energy and protein level for kidney-pelvic and heart fat (KPH), KPH was higher in lambs fed high energy and high protein diet but not in high energy and low protein diet. The KPH was increased (20.2%, p = 0.01) in high-energy diets, while fat thickness was increased (21.7%, p = 0.02) in high-protein diets. Therefore, it is concluded that dietary energy levels play a more important role in feed efficiency than protein levels in finishing lambs with a high-energy diet (>2.80 Mcal/kg ME). Providing a level of protein above 14.5% does not improves growth-performance, dietary energetics or carcass dressing percentage.

We conducted two trials to examine the influence of dietary forage level (FL; 16 and 8% sudangrass hay) and forage coarseness of grind (COG; ground to pass through a 2.5- vs 7.6-cm diameter screen) on growth performance and digestive function in feedlot steers fed a steam-flaked corn-based finishing diet. Thirty-two Mexican crossbred steers (297 kg) were used to determine treatment effects on growth performance during an 80-d finishing period. There were no treatment interactions (P > .10). Reducing FL increased (17%, P < .05) ADG. decreased (23%, P < .01) feed/gain, and increased (17% and 22%, P < .01) dietary NEm and NEg. Coarseness of grind did not affect (P > .10) steer performance. Treatment effects on digestive function were evaluated using four Holstein steers with cannulas in the rumen and proximal duodenum. There were no treatment interactions (P > .10) on nutrient digestibility. Forage level did not affect (P > .10) ruminal digestion of OM, N, or microbial efficiency. However, decreasing FL increased (P < .05) total tract digestion of OM (5.0%), N (5.7%), and ME (8.7%). Increasing COG increased total tract digestibility of OM (2.3%, P < .01), ADF (24.4%, P < .01); N (3.8%, P < .01), and ME (3.7%, P < .05). Increasing FL increased (P < .10) ruminal pH and decreased (P < .10) ruminal molar proportions of butyrate. Increasing COG did not influence (P > .10) ruminal pH or ruminal VFA molar proportions. We conclude that increasing coarseness of ground sudangrass may not improve the performance of feedlot steers when the forage is fed at either 8 or 16% of diet DM, although measures of ruminal and total tract nutrient digestibility may be slightly increased.

No abstract

No abstract

As a result of the cost of grains, the replacement of grains by co-products (i.e. DDGS) in feedlot diets is a common practice. This change produces diets that contain a lower amount of starch and greater amount of fibre. Hypothetically, combining feed grade urea (U) with slow release urea (Optigen) in this type of diet should elicit a better synchrony between starch (high-rate of digestion) and fibre (low-rate of digestion) promoting a better microbial protein synthesis and ruminal digestion with increasing the digestible energy of the diet. Four cannulated Holstein steers (213±4 kg) were used in a 4×4 Latin square design to examine the combination of Optigen and U in a finishing diet containing different starch:acid detergent fibre ratios (S:F) on the characteristics of digestive function. Three S:F ratios (3.0, 4.5, and 6.0) were tested using a combination of U (0.80%) and Optigen (1.0%). Additionally, a treatment of 4.5 S:F ratio with urea (0.80% in ration) as the sole source of non-protein nitrogen was used to compare the effect of urea combination at same S:F ratio. The S:F ratio of the diet was manipulated by replacing the corn grain by dried distillers grain with solubles and roughage. Urea combination did not affect ruminal pH. The S:F ratio did not affect ruminal pH at 0 and 2 h post-feeding but, at 4 and 6 h, the ruminal pH decreased as the S:F ratio increased (linear, p<0.05). Ruminal digestion of OM, starch and feed N were not affected by urea combination or S:F ratio. The urea combination did not affect ADF ruminal digestion. ADF ruminal digestion decreased linearly (p = 0.02) as the S:F ratio increased. Compared to the urea treatment (p<0.05) and within the urea combination treatment (quadratic, p<0.01), the flow of microbial nitrogen (MN) to the small intestine and ruminal microbial efficiency were greater for the urea combination at a S:F ratio of 4.5. Irrespective of the S:F ratio, the urea combination improved (2.8%, p = 0.02) postruminal N digestion. As S:F ratio increased, OM digestion increased, but ADF total tract digestion decreased. The combination of urea at 4.5 S:F improved (2%, p = 0.04) the digestible energy (DE) more than expected. Combining urea and Optigen resulted in positive effects on the MN flow and DE of the diet, but apparently these advantages are observed only when there is a certain proportion of starch:ADF in the diet.