Gravel (particle size ≥ 2 mm) is common in soil profiles of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (QTP). It has different thermal and hydrological properties than other fine mineral soils (particle size < 2 mm), which may have significant impacts on the thermal and hydrological processes of soil. However, few models have considered gravel. In this study, we implemented the thermal and hydraulic properties of gravel into the Dynamic Organic Soil-Terrestrial Ecosystem Model to develop new schemes to simulate the dynamics of permafrost on the QTP. Results showed that: (1) the widely used Farouki thermal scheme always simulated higher thermal conductivity of frozen soils than unfrozen soils with the same soil water content; therefore it tends to overestimate permafrost thickness strongly; (2) there exists a soil moisture threshold, below which the new set of schemes with gravel simulated smaller thermal conductivity of frozen soils than unfrozen soils; (3) soil with gravel has higher hydraulic conductivity and poorer water retention capability; and simulations with gravel were usually drier than those without gravel; and (4) the new schemes simulated faster upward degradation than downward degradation; and the simulated permafrost thicknesses were sensitive to the fraction of gravel, the gravel size, the thickness of soil with gravel, and the subsurface drainage. To reduce the uncertainties in the projection of permafrost degradation on the QTP, more effort should be made to: (1) developing robust relationships between soil thermal and hydraulic properties and gravel characteristics based on laboratory work; and (2) compiling spatial datasets of the vertical distribution of gravel content based on measurements during drilling or the digging of soil pits
The water retention characteristic is one of the fundamental properties that control water movement in unsaturated soils. Because of the complexity and heterogeneity of soil properties, variability and uncertainty of this property has long been a key issue in understanding the relationship between water content and matric pressure. Although considerable progress has been achieved in understanding spatial and local variability, discussions have primarily been based on deterministic analyses. Misleading conclusions can result since the derived variability cannot often be discriminated from uncertainties in model parameters, structure, and observed data. Using a combined deterministic and stochastic analysis, this paper addresses the variability of the retention characteristic in association with the uncertainty of water retention models. Calibrated against two sets of lysimeter data observed over 2 years, the analysis yields insights into the physical changes in the system, and model performance is significantly improved when these effects are explicitly included. sessment of model structures and uncertainties becomes essential in model identification. Although considerable research has been devoted to the development of various water retention models, estimation of spatial variability, derivation of model parameters from soil texture [McCuen et al., 1981], and interpretation of the physical meaning of the empirical parameters, issues of model uncertainty and identifiability have not been simultaneously and properly discussed. Consequently, misleading conclusions can easily result, in particular, when the model is applied to a range of states that is not covered by calibration data. For instance, when the model is applied deterministically to a soil condition for which it is not calibrated, unidentifiable parameters may become sensitive. Model structural uncertainty can be misinterpreted as spatial variability in a heterogeneous geological medium when large-scale heterogeneity is derived from sample scale data [Desbarats, 1995]. Milly [1987] showed that multiple minima exist in the objective functions used to estimate optimally the parameters of water retention models, a clear indication of lack of parameter identifiability. Thus uncertainty can pose both practical and more fundamental problems in the application of water retention models. Currently, calibration of water retention models is mostly carried out with data from drainage experiments, either through laboratory analysis of field samples, for which a relatively wide range of data is available [Ferrand and Celia, 1992], or in situ by simultaneous measurement of soil water tension and volumetric water content [Hopmans, 1987]. Although model parameters can be better identified from laboratory data, the results are often quite different from measurements at a field site [Wierenga et al., 1991; Eching et al., 1994] because of the differences in the conditions under which the model is calibrated (in the laboratory) and the model is applied (in the field). Howeve...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.