CI seems to have clinical advantages over AI for colonoscopy with regard to pain during and after the procedure.

The objective of this article is to systematically analyse the randomized, controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of local anaesthetic infiltration prior to the rubber band ligation of early symptomatic haemorrhoids. Published randomized, controlled trials comparing the use of local anaesthetic (LA) versus no-local anaesthetic (NLA) for the rubber band ligation of early symptomatic haemorrhoids were analysed using RevMan®, and the combined outcomes were expressed as odds ratios (OR) and standardized mean difference (SMD). Four randomized, controlled trials evaluating 387 patients were retrieved from the standard electronic databases. The risk of treatment failure (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.07, 2.79; z = 0.87; p = 0.39) and post-procedure complications (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.08, 2.76; z = 0.83; p = 0.41) was similar between two techniques. However, the post-procedure pain score (SMD -5.19; 95% CI -9.08, -1.30; z = 2.62; p < 0.009) was significantly lower in the group of patients undergoing rubber band ligation of haemorrhoids under local anaesthetic injection. The use of LA appears to have clinically measurable advantages over NLA in the rubber band ligation of early symptomatic haemorrhoids to lessen post-procedure pain.

The objective of this article is to systematically analyse the randomized, controlled trials comparing open (OPPR) versus laparoscopic (LPPR) preperitoneal mesh repair of inguinal hernia. Randomized, controlled trials comparing OPPR versus LPPR of inguinal hernia were analysed systematically using RevMan®, and combined outcomes were expressed as odds ratio (OR) and standardized mean difference (SMD). Ten randomized trials evaluating 1286 patients were retrieved from the electronic databases. There were 606 patients in the OPPR repair group and 680 patients in the LPPR group. There was significant heterogeneity among trials (p < 0.0001). Therefore, in the random effects model, LPPR was associated with longer operative time and relatively lesser postoperative pain in the case of the trans-abdominal preperitoneal approach. Statistically, both OPPR and LPPR were equivalent in terms of developing chronic groin pain, recurrence and postoperative complications. OPPR of inguinal hernia is associated with shorter operative time and comparable with LPPR (both total extraperitoneal and trans-abdominal preperitoneal approaches) in terms of risk of chronic groin pain, recurrence and complications.

No abstract

To systematically analyse the published randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the use of oral bowel preparation (OBP) versus enema bowel preparation (EBP) for diagnostic or screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Published RCTs, comparing the use of OBP versus EBP, were analysed using RevMan(®), and the combined outcomes were expressed as odds ratios (OR). Eight RCTs evaluating 2457 patients were retrieved from the standard electronic databases. There was significant heterogeneity among included trials. The compliance of the patients (p = 0.32) and the acceptability of both bowel preparation regimens (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.67, 2.99; z = 0.92; p = 0.36) were similar in both groups. In addition, the incidence of adverse reactions (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.54, 1.41; z = 0.57; p = 0.57), the risk of incomplete procedure due to poor bowel preparation (p = 0.18) and the incidence of poor bowel preparation (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.63, 2.33; z = 0.59; p = 0.56) were also similar in both groups. EBP and OBP were equally effective for bowel preparation in patients undergoing flexible sigmoidoscopy. Although this study failed to demonstrate the superiority of EBP, at least equivalent efficacy for bowel cleansing may be extrapolated.