Introduction The objectives of this performance improvement project is to facilitate earlier goals of care discussions led by the Palliative Care team for burn patients with a high risk of mortality, and to improve overall communication with families of patients. The Advanced Care Planning Trigger Tool utilizes the Revised Baux Score, a burn mortality scoring system, which is calculated by adding the patient’s age, total body surface area (TBSA) of the patient’s burn as a whole number, and adding an additional 17 points if the patient has an inhalation injury. From January 1st, 2017 to June 1st, 2018 16 patients were admitted to the Burn Center with a Revised Baux Score of over 100. Of those 16 patients, 11 passed away due to their injuries during admission, equaling a 69% mortality. Palliative Care consults were triggered for 4 out of the 16 patients (25%), and all 4 of these patients passed away during their hospital stay. Methods Revised Baux Score is calculated on each new burn admission. A consult to the Palliative Care Team for Advanced Care Planning is triggered within 48 hours of admission, if a patient’s Revised Baux Score is above 110 and they are greater than 60 years old; or any adult patient (over 18 years old) with a score of 130 or greater. Results The project was implemented in June of 2018. This tool led to an increase in Palliative Care team involvement early on for patients with a high risk of mortality from their burn injury, more effective care planning discussions with families and improved collaboration between the Burn team and Palliative Care team. Conclusions All patients with a Revised Baux Score that triggered the Advanced Care Planning Tool for a consult were ordered palliative care consults within 48 hours of admission. Applicability of Research to Practice Advanced Care Planning with the Palliative Care team leads to increased communication and more effective care planning for patients with a high risk of mortality.
Introduction The Burn Resuscitation Critical Reflective Practice (CRP) was started as collaborative meetings to review 1st 48 hours of admission for burn resuscitations (resus) October 2018- July 2019. All multi- disciplinary teams were invited. The problem identified was on average burn resus patients (>20% TBSA) were being over resuscitated in 1st 24 hours of admission. The goals of the CRP were: 1) Decrease resus fluid in the 1st 24 hours; 2) Increase knowledge of the current fluid resus pathway; 3) Increase communication with interdisciplinary teams during the resus. Methods CRP initiated in October 2018. 6 CRPs were held October 2018- July 2019.The average ml/ KG/ TBSA prior to CRP from January 2017- September 2018 was 5.17ml/kg/TBSA (goal: < 4ml). Chart reviews were done to gather data from each resus (i.e. urine output, fluids, labs, events). Discussions held with staff involved in the 1st 24 hours of resus regarding any communication/process issues.Patient data was presented & staff members present would discuss questions/ issues that came up during the resus. Multi-disciplinary teams surveyed prior to CRP to assess comfort/competence with current resus pathway and communication. 46 surveys received prior to initiating CRP. After initiating CRP October 2018- July 2019, staff members that had attended >1 CRP were post-surveyed. Results January 2017- October 2018 average ml/ KG/ TBSA was 5.17ml/kg/TBSA. October 2018- July 2019 POST CRP implementation, the avg ml/ KG/ TBSA was 3.86 ml LR/ kg/ TBSA in 1st 24 hours of resus. 3 new practices were implemented 1) Decrease fluids by 200ml/hr (instead of 100) when UOP is >100/hr at least 2 hours into resus; 2) Double sign by 2 RNs required when calculating Parkland Formula; 3) Guideline created to guide communication between Burn RNs & trauma bay when burn resus arrives. Post- survey data showed increase in comfort communicating with physicians regarding resus & increase in comfort/confidence in calculating Parkland Formula. 2 additional subjective questions were added onto the post- CRP survey. Conclusions Fluids given in the 1st 24 hours decreased from 5.17 to 3.86 average ml/ kg/ TBSA post- CRP. 3 new practices were implemented as discussed in results. Staff felt more comfortable communicating with team & calculating Parkland formula. Staff had positive responses on the post- survey. Applicability of Research to Practice The monthly CRPs are to be continued to discuss all burn resus patients received during the prior month. Allows team members to continue to modify practice as needed by what’s learned through each CRP to help better our patient outcomes and decrease overall resus fluids.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.