The literature on the compatibility of Rhizobium sp. with seed protectant chemicals is controversial because of variation in methods and the lack of quantitative data. The present study was planned to develop a reliable quantitative method of measuring compatibility of Rhizobium japonicum with seed‐applied fungicides. The effect of four seed protectant chemicals on survival of R. japonicum on soybean (Glycine max L. Merr. cv. ‘Hark’) seed was studied in laboratory growth chamber experiments. The chemicals tested and levels used were tetramethyl‐thiuram‐disulfide (thiram), 0.6 g/kg seed; N‐trichloromethylthio‐4‐cyclohexene‐l,2‐dicarboximide (captan), 0.8 g/kg seed; 5,6‐Dihydro‐2‐methyl‐l,4‐oxathiin‐3‐carboxanilide (carboxin), 1.1 g/kg seed; and pentachloronitrobenzene (PCNB), 0.9 g/kg seed. Quantitative measurements for compatibility included plate counts for survival of R. japonicum on inoculated chemically treated seed and counts of taproot nodules on plants at 2 weeks age. R. japonicum were compatible with Thiram and Carboxin but not with PCNB and Captan. PCNB reduced Rhizobium survival on seed and decreased taproot nodulation. Captan was less toxic to rhizobia than was PCNB, but taproot nodulation of plants was greatly reduced by captan. Carboxin had little effect on viable rhizobia or taproot nodulation when seeds were planted within 4 hours of inoculation. Nodulation was poor when these seeds were planted 24 hours after inoculation despite the presence of what would normally be considered adequate viable rhizobia. Thiram had no adverse effect on viable rhizobia or taproot nodulation even when seeds were held 24 hours before planting. The results also indicate that compatibility must be measured quantitatively in relation to time and that nodulating ability of the surviving bacteria is the prime factor in determining compatibility.

No abstract

Nodules that form on the roots of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) when infected with Rhizobium are the site of N‐fixation. F3 plants were identified in a breeding nursery at Marianna, Fla., which showed N starvation symptoms toward maturity and apparently had no nodules on their roots. These plants were derived from a cross between two normal nodulating parents, 487A‐4‐1‐2 ✕ PI 262090. Subsequent evaluations in the F4 to F6 generations confirmed that numerous selections from this cross failed to nodulate in the field at Marianna. Growth chamber inoculation studies with various strains of rhizobia confirmed the field evaluations. Seed of selected plants from field plots classified as non‐nodulated were utilized in these studies. Only five of 400 progeny from non‐nodulating plant selections bore nodules in these tests.

No abstract

Synopsis Both types of inoculant were effective when the seed were planted 1 day after inoculating, but when seed were held for 7, 14, or 21 days before planting, the peat‐base inoculant proved superior in bringing about effective nodulation and higher yields. The efficiency of the liquid inoculum for preinoculating soybeans was not improved appreciably by increasing the number of rhizobia 2½ times. Possible explanations of the superiority of the peat base inoculum are discussed.