Summary:Most bone marrow transplant recipients are infertile due to reversible or irreversible testicular failure. However, little is known about the gonadotoxic potential of the newly introduced nonmyeloablative transplants. We undertook a 24-month longitudinal study in a cohort of 32 recipients of nonmyeloablative transplantation to test whether the combined regimen of fludarabine, melphalan and CAMPATH-1H can induce damage to germ cell (GC) and Leydig cell (LC) compartments. Testicular function was assessed immediately prior to transplantation and at four time points post-transplant to compare hormonal levels before and after the procedure. Two other groups treated with BEAM-and TBI-related regimes were also included in the study group for comparative purposes. GC function was assessed by measuring basal serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). LC function was assessed by measuring basal luteinising hormone (LH) and testosterone (T) levels. LC reserve was assessed by measuring the T/LH ratio. As a group, patients who received a non myeloablative transplant sustained severe damage to the GC compartment, as evident from a substantial elevation in the FSH level post-transplant (12 IU/l vs 18.4 IU/l, Po0.001). Similar to the GC injury, patients as a group sustained significant damage to the LC compartment following the transplant (5.4 IU/l vs 9.6 IU/ l, Po0.001). In general, patients had reduced LC reserve post-BMT, as evident from a diminished T/LH ratio (2.6 pretransplant vs 1.6 post-transplant P ¼ 0.05). Patients who received a nonmyeloablative transplant had a similar effect on the GC and LC compartments compared to those who had a BEAM autograft. On the other hand, patients who received a TBI-based transplant sustained more damage to their GC and LC compartments compared to those who received a nonmyeloblative transplant; however, this was not statistically significant (P ¼ 0.09). Our data suggest that this type of regimen is potentially gonadotoxic and consideration should be given to fertility counselling and testosterone replacement therapy posttransplant.
It is uncertain why only one third of Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients develop nephropathy. One suggestion is the inheritance of a predisposition to essential hypertension. We have previously found elevated Na+/H+ antiport activity and a raised intracellular pH in leucocytes from hypertensive and Type 1 diabetic subjects with albuminuria using a novel double ionophore fluorimetric technique. These changes are not found in Type 1 diabetic subjects without albuminuria. We wished to test the effect of a protein kinase C inhibitor staurosporine (100 nmol/l) on the elevated antiport activity, and the degree of stimulation achieved by exogenous diacyl glycerol. Raised leucocyte Na+/H+ antiport activity of Type 1 diabetic subjects with albuminuria (73.8 +/- 17.2 mmol.l-1.min-1) was restored to normal levels with staurosporine (54.9 +/- 17.9 mmol.l-1.min-1, p less than 0.001). The leucocyte Na+/H+ antiport activity of diabetic subjects without albuminuria fell significantly also with staurosporine but to a lesser extent (57.3 +/- 11.6 to 50.0 +/- 12.8 mmol/l, p less than 0.003). In contrast, leucocytes from normal control subjects showed no change in antiport activity with staurosporine (54.3 +/- 8.5 to 52.6 +/- 10.4 mmol.l-1.min-1). Dioctanoyl glycerol stimulated the leucocyte Na+/H+ antiport in normal subjects and diabetic patients without albuminuria, with significantly less stimulation in diabetic patients with albuminuria. We conclude that reversal by staurosporine of the elevated Na+/H+ antiport activity in Type 1 diabetic subjects with albuminuria could indicate a role for protein kinase C in activating the antiport. This hypothesis is supported by the reduced stimulation of the antiport by dioctanoyl glycerol in this group of patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.