EQT wants to maximize recovery and control development costs in its Marcellus shale development program, which consists of multi-stage fractured horizontal wells. To achieve this objective the asset team considered tighter well spacing. But at what distance do fracture-stimulated wells directly interact? Microseismic data implies that the radius of influence is greater than 1,000 ft. However, after 6 months of production, a study using a nodal analysis software model suggests an effective frac half-length less than half of this, a finding that has been supported in other EQT wells across Pennsylvania and West Virginia. To test this concept for horizontal wells with multi-stage slickwater, sand-propped frac completions in the Marcellus shale—where well spacing is typically 1000-1200 ft—well spacing was reduced to just 500 ft, in three different areas of the Marcellus. The goal was to better understand: How do the hydraulic fractures interact? Are the closer spaced wells more likely to share reserves? Does the frac design need to be adjusted for tighter spaced wells? To answer these questions, 500-ft and 1000-ft offset wells were monitored during completion with microseismic, radioactive tracers, chemical tracers, and pressure gauges. Production logging was initially scheduled to begin 4-6 months after production, however, had to be postponed. With more than 6 months of production data in the first of the three development areas, the 500-ft-spaced wells and 1000- ft-spaced wells are performing similarly, despite frac communication during the completion of the 500-ft wells. Estimates of effective frac half-length from the nodal analysis model support this conclusion. A unique, comprehensive data set is collected across the Marcellus shale to document how hydraulic fracturing influences well performance, and the study attempts to reconcile conflicting frac half-length interpretations to identify optimal well spacing. The results to date support tighter spacing, which maximizes recovery and facilitates multiple wells to be drilledfrom the same pad, thereby minimizing the footprint for "greener" operations.
The use of fiber-optic-sensing technology for the evaluation of completion efficiency, primary cement sheath integrity, and offset well interference has become more prevalent in recent years. In addition, the use of a fiber-optic cable for microseismic monitoring as opposed to traditional wireline-conveyed geophones was recently introduced. Various fiber deployment methods have been developed over the years to allow operators to make rapid decisions in real-time based on distributed acoustic sensing (DAS), distributed temperature sensing (DTS), and microseismic data, all provided by a small fiber- optic cable deployed in the well and monitored at surface via sophisticated interrogation equipment. Historically, fiber-optic cables were deployed in a permanent configuration, strapped to the production casing, in a manner similar to a standard control line, and deployed with the casing prior to cementing. Permanent fiber has become simpler and cost effective over time and provides valuable near wellbore information - and there are continuous developments to keep reducing that cost and complexity. Some operator focus has been less on the monitoring of the completion efficiency metrics and more on understanding the cross well interference data provided from fiber. As a result, operators have looked to other, temporary-type deployment options for fiber. Two typical temporary deployments are via coiled-tubing and an armored fiber-optic cable. For the first method, a fiber-optic cable is fed into a coiled-tubing reel and then deployed downhole to monitor the strain when the well is impacted or closely impacted by a hydraulic fracture from an adjacent well. An armored fiber-optic cable deployment is similar to electric wireline in that it is installed in the well during pump down or with a wireline tractor. Both these options are viable and readily available; however, they include supplementary expenses in terms of equipment required to convey the fiber into the well. In addition, the surface footprint required during the conveyance and monitoring phases of the operation is substantial with crane(s), a coiled-tubing unit or wireline unit, and associated on-location equipment required during the job. Figure 1 depicts a wireline-conveyed fiber operation in conjunction with fracturing operations. Additional equipment in the form of a wireline truck and extra crane are highlighted in yellow. In contrast, a wellsite where disposable fiber is being deployed is shown in Figure 2. Once the fiber is landed, the pump units are removed and only a trailer and crew pickup remain on-site. Figure 1 Typical fracturing operation, wireline-conveyed fiber Figure 2 Typical offset well monitoring wellsite, disposable fiber This paper will discuss a new, low-cost option now available to conduct cross well monitoring and microseismic evaluation of offset completions using a disposable optical fiber that requires minimal equipment to deploy into the wellbore, reduces surface impact during the operational phase, provides quality strain information with excellent quality microseismic data when compared to other fiber-optic deployment methods, and is able to be disposed of at the conclusion of the operation with no detriments or impediments to the completion of the well it has been deployed in. This fiber was successfully deployed for the first time in the Marcellus Shale for Chesapeake Energy with minimal operational disturbance and reduced costs when compared to similar technologies. It was demonstrated to provide valuable data for the purposes of understanding the impact of hydraulic fracturing on far-field communication and evaluating both the temporal fracture response and zonal impact caused by structural changes across the lateral.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.