During protein synthesis, the ribosome controls the movement of transfer RNA (tRNA) and messenger RNA (mRNA) by means of large-scale structural rearrangements. We describe structures of the intact bacterial ribosome from Escherichia coli that reveal how the ribosome binds tRNA in two functionally distinct states, determined to a resolution of ~3.2 Å by x-ray crystallography. One state positions tRNA in the peptidyl-tRNA binding site. The second, a fully rotated state, is stabilized by ribosome recycling factor (RRF) and binds tRNA in a highly bent conformation in a hybrid peptidyl/exit (P/E) site. The structures help to explain how the ratchet-like motion of the two ribosomal subunits contributes to the mechanisms of translocation, termination, and ribosome recycling.

Differences between the structures of bacterial, archaeal, and eukaryotic ribosomes account for the selective action of antibiotics. Even minor variations in the structure of ribosomes of different bacterial species may lead to idiosyncratic, species-specific interactions of the drugs with their targets. Although crystallographic structures of antibiotics bound to the peptidyl transferase center or the exit tunnel of archaeal ( Haloarcula marismortui ) and bacterial ( Deinococcus radiodurans ) large ribosomal subunits have been reported, it remains unclear whether the interactions of antibiotics with these ribosomes accurately reflect those with the ribosomes of pathogenic bacteria. Here we report X-ray crystal structures of the Escherichia coli ribosome in complexes with clinically important antibiotics of four major classes, including the macrolide erythromycin, the ketolide telithromycin, the lincosamide clindamycin, and a phenicol, chloramphenicol, at resolutions of ∼3.3  Å –3.4  Å . Binding modes of three of these antibiotics show important variations compared to the previously determined structures. Biochemical and structural evidence also indicates that interactions of telithromycin with the E. coli ribosome more closely resembles drug binding to ribosomes of bacterial pathogens. The present data further argue that the identity of nucleotides 752, 2609, and 2055 of 23S ribosomal RNA explain in part the spectrum and selectivity of antibiotic action.

SummaryStructures of the E. coli 70S ribosome show how the large and small subunits rotate to facilitate protein synthesis.Protein biosynthesis on the ribosome requires repeated cycles of ratcheting, which couples rotation of the two ribosomal subunits with respect to each other and swiveling of the head domain of the small subunit. However, the molecular basis for how the two ribosomal subunits rearrange contacts with each other during ratcheting while remaining stably associated is not known. Here we describe x-ray crystal structures of the intact Escherichia coli ribosome, either in the apo form (3.5 Å resolution) or with one (4.0 Å res) or two (4.0 Å res) anticodon stem-loop tRNA mimics bound, that reveal intermediate states of intersubunit rotation. In the structures, the interface between the small and large ribosomal subunits rearranges in discrete steps along the ratcheting pathway. Positioning of the head domain of the small subunit is controlled by interactions with the large subunit and with the tRNA bound in the peptidyl-tRNA site. The intermediates observed here provide insight into how tRNAs move into the hybrid state of binding that precedes the final steps of mRNA and tRNA translocation.Protein biosynthesis requires many large-scale rearrangements in the ribosome as each amino acid is added to a growing polypeptide chain. Positioning of tRNA on the ribosome is proposed to occur through a ratcheting mechanism. Central to this mechanism is a rotation of the small ribosomal subunit relative to the large subunit (Fig. 1A) (1,2) that occurs in all stages of translation-initiation, elongation, termination, and ribosome recycling (1)-and is targeted by clinically useful antibiotics (3,4). For example after each peptide bond is formed, an ~8°i ntersubunit rotation results in tRNAs bound in the aminoacyl-tRNA and peptidyl-tRNA binding sites (A site and P site, respectively) moving into the P site and exit-tRNA site (E site) on the large ribosomal subunit (Fig. 1B). From this hybrid state of tRNA binding (Fig. 1B) (1,5), the tRNAs are then translocated to the P site and E site on the small subunit.In addition to intersubunit rotation, ratcheting also involves a nearly orthogonal rotation of the head domain of the small ribosomal subunit (Fig. 1C) that plays a role in controlling the position of tRNAs within the ribosome (1,6,7). As with intersubunit rotation, movement of the head domain is a target for clinically useful antibiotics (8). Swiveling of the head domain relative to the body of the small subunit may also be required for the intrinsic helicase activity of the ribosome in unwinding secondary structure in mRNA (8,9). Rotations of up to 14° allow the head domain to change its position by 20 Å or more at the ribosomal subunit interface, or the width of a tRNA substrate (7). The molecular basis for how the ribosomal subunits rotate with respect to each other while remaining stably associated remains unknown (1,10). Furthermore, the precise timing of movements of the small subunit head domain during ra...

The biological functions of RNA are ultimately governed by the local environment at each nucleotide. Selective 2′-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension (SHAPE) chemistry is a powerful approach for measuring nucleotide structure and dynamics in diverse biological environments. SHAPE reagents acylate the 2′-hydroxyl group at flexible nucleotides because unconstrained nucleotides preferentially sample rare conformations that enhance the nucleophilicity of the 2′-hydroxyl. The critical corollary is that some constrained nucleotides must be poised for efficient reaction at the 2′-hydroxyl group. To identify such nucleotides, we performed SHAPE on intact crystals of the E. coli ribosome, monitored the reactivity of 1490 nucleotides in 16S ribosomal RNA, and examined those nucleotides that were hyper-reactive towards SHAPE and had well-defined crystallographic conformations. Analysis of these conformations revealed that 2′-hydroxyl reactivity is broadly facilitated by general base catalysis involving multiple RNA functional groups and by two specific orientations of the bridging 3′-phosphate group. Nucleotide analog studies confirmed the contributions of these mechanisms to SHAPE reactivity. These results provide a strong mechanistic explanation for the relationship between SHAPE reactivity and local RNA dynamics and will facilitate interpretation of SHAPE information in the many technologies that make use of this chemistry.

No abstract

Maintenance of the correct reading frame on the ribosome is essential for accurate protein synthesis. Here, we report structures of the 70S ribosome bound to frameshift suppressor tRNA SufA6 and N1-methylguanosine at position 37 (m 1 G37) modification-deficient anticodon stem loop Pro , both of which cause the ribosome to decode 4 rather than 3 nucleotides, resulting in a +1 reading frame. Our results reveal that decoding at +1 suppressible codons causes suppressor tRNA SufA6 to undergo a rearrangement of its 5′ stem that destabilizes U32, thereby disrupting the conserved U32-A38 base pair. Unexpectedly, the removal of the m 1 G37 modification of tRNA Pro also disrupts U32-A38 pairing in a structurally analogous manner. The lack of U32-A38 pairing provides a structural correlation between the transition from canonical translation and a +1 reading of the mRNA. Our structures clarify the molecular mechanism behind suppressor tRNA-induced +1 frameshifting and advance our understanding of the role played by the ribosome in maintaining the correct translational reading frame.near cognate | processivity T he three polymerase reactions of DNA replication, RNA transcription, and protein translation are essential to life and all involve a delicate balance between speed and fidelity. The bacterial ribosome decodes three mRNA nucleotides into a single amino acid at a rate of ∼20 residues/s with high fidelity (10 3

Aminoglycosides are potent, broad spectrum, ribosome-targeting antibacterials whose clinical efficacy is seriously threatened by multiple resistance mechanisms. Here, we report the structural basis for 30S recognition by the novel plasmid-mediated aminoglycoside-resistance rRNA methyltransferase A (NpmA). These studies are supported by biochemical and functional assays that define the molecular features necessary for NpmA to catalyze m 1 A1408 modification and confer resistance. The requirement for the mature 30S as a substrate for NpmA is clearly explained by its recognition of four disparate 16S rRNA helices brought into proximity by 30S assembly. Our structure captures a "precatalytic state" in which multiple structural reorganizations orient functionally critical residues to flip A1408 from helix 44 and position it precisely in a remodeled active site for methylation. Our findings provide a new molecular framework for the activity of aminoglycoside-resistance rRNA methyltransferases that may serve as a functional paradigm for other modification enzymes acting late in 30S biogenesis.antibiotic resistance | base flipping | RNA modification

Bacteria contain multiple type II toxins that selectively degrade mRNAs bound to the ribosome to regulate translation and growth and facilitate survival during the stringent response. Ribosomedependent toxins recognize a variety of three-nucleotide codons within the aminoacyl (A) site, but how these endonucleases achieve substrate specificity remains poorly understood. Here, we identify the critical features for how the host inhibition of growth B (HigB) toxin recognizes each of the three A-site nucleotides for cleavage. X-ray crystal structures of HigB bound to two different codons on the ribosome illustrate how HigB uses a microbial RNase-like nucleotide recognition loop to recognize either cytosine or adenosine at the second A-site position. Strikingly, a single HigB residue and 16S rRNA residue C1054 form an adenosine-specific pocket at the third A-site nucleotide, in contrast to how tRNAs decode mRNA. Our results demonstrate that the most important determinant for mRNA cleavage by ribosome-dependent toxins is interaction with the third A-site nucleotide. (1,3,4). This rapid inhibitory switch suppresses metabolite consumption and temporarily halts cell growth to promote bacterial survival until nutrients are readily available. Among the prosurvival genes regulated by (p)ppGpp production are toxin-antitoxin modules, which have additional roles in antibiotic resistance and tolerance, biofilm and persister cell formation, and niche-specific colonization (5-11). The critical roles toxin-antitoxin pairs play in bacterial physiology underscore the importance of understanding their molecular targets and modes of action.There are five different classes (I to V) of toxin-antitoxin systems defined by how the antitoxin represses toxin function (1). Type II toxin-antitoxin pairs form protein-protein complexes during exponential growth that serve two purposes: inhibition of toxin activity by antitoxin binding and transcriptional autorepression to limit toxin expression (12). Antitoxins are proteolytically degraded after (p)ppGpp accumulation, leading to derepression at the toxin-antitoxin promoter (8, 12). Liberated toxin proteins inhibit the replication or translation machinery by targeting DNA gyrase, initiator tRNA fMet , glutamyl-tRNA synthetase, EF-Tu, free mRNA, ribosome-bound mRNA, and the ribosome itself (13-20).Ribosome-dependent toxins cleave mRNAs on the ribosome between the second and third nucleotides of the aminoacyl (A)-site codon (21-23). Although collectively Escherichia coli ribosome-dependent toxins target a diverse range of codons, each individual toxin appears to have a strong codon preference and cleaves at defined positions along the mRNA (24-26). RelE cleaves at UAG stop codons and the CAG sense codon (all codons denoted in the 5′-3′ direction); YoeB cleaves at codons following a translational AUG start site and at the UAA stop codon; and YafQ cleaves a single AAA sense codon (16,24,(27)(28)(29). In contrast, Proteus vulgaris host inhibition of growth B (HigB) toxin degrades multiple codons encod...