This study aims to determine the relative contribution of oocyte and/or sperm dysfunction to the reduction of fertilization rates in vitro in cases of minor endometriosis and prolonged unexplained infertility. The results of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment with ovarian stimulation have been compared between couples with the above conditions and women with tubal infertility (as control for oocyte function) and the use of donor spermatozoa (as control for sperm function). Fertilization and cleavage rates using husband's spermatozoa were significantly reduced in endometriosis couples (56%, n = 194, P < 0.001) and further significantly reduced in couples with unexplained infertility (52%, n = 327, P < 0.001) compared with tubal infertility (60%, n = 509). Using donor spermatozoa the rates were the same as using husband's spermatozoa in tubal infertility (61%, n = 27) or endometriosis (55%, n = 21) but significantly though only partly improved with unexplained infertility (57%, n = 60, P < 0.02). In unexplained infertility, a significantly increased proportion of couples experienced complete failure of fertilization and cleavage in a cycle (5-6% versus 2-3%). However, complete failure was not usually repetitive, and the affected couples did not account for the overall reduction in fertilization and cleavage rates, which remained significantly lower in the rest of the unexplained and endometriosis groups. Implantation and pregnancy rates appeared similar in all groups. The benefit of IVF treatment in cases of minor endometriosis and prolonged unexplained infertility is due to superabundance of oocytes obtained by stimulation. The reduction in natural fertility associated with endometriosis appears to be at least partly due to a reduced fertilizing ability of the oocyte. In unexplained infertility, there is distinct impairment due to otherwise unsuspected sperm dysfunction but probably also oocyte dysfunction.

BackgroundVitamin D insufficiency may be associated with depressive symptoms in non-pregnant adults. We performed this study to evaluate whether low maternal vitamin D levels are associated with depressive symptoms in pregnancy.MethodsThis study was a secondary analysis of a randomized trial designed to assess whether prenatal omega-3 fatty acid supplementation would prevent depressive symptoms. Pregnant women from Michigan who were at risk for depression based on Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale Score or history of depression were enrolled. Participants completed the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview at 12–20 weeks, 26–28 weeks, 34–36 weeks, and 6–8 weeks postpartum. Vitamin D levels were measured at 12–20 weeks (N = 117) and 34–36 weeks (N = 112). Complete datasets were available on 105 subjects. Using regression analyses, we evaluated the relationship between vitamin D levels with BDI scores as well as with MINI diagnoses of major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. Our primary outcome measure was the association of maternal vitamin D levels with BDI scores during early and late pregnancy and postpartum.ResultsWe found that vitamin D levels at 12–20 weeks were inversely associated with BDI scores both at 12—20 and at 34–36 weeks’ gestation (P < 0.05, both). For every one unit increase in vitamin D in early pregnancy, the average decrease in the mean BDI score was .14 units. Vitamin D levels were not associated with diagnoses of major depressive disorder or generalized anxiety disorder.ConclusionsIn women at risk for depression, early pregnancy low vitamin D levels are associated with higher depressive symptom scores in early and late pregnancy. Future investigations should study whether vitamin D supplementation in early pregnancy may prevent perinatal depressive symptoms.Trial registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/ Registration Number: NCT00711971

A pilot study was designed to examine whether the outcome of embryo transfer in women with a hydrosalpinx might be improved by surgical drainage of the hydrosalpinx at the time of oocyte collection for in-vitro fertilization treatment. A comparative, controlled but retrospective analysis of the results was performed of all women with infective tubal damage aged <40 years old, who had ovulatory cycles, a normal uterus and a partner with normal spermatozoa. A standardized treatment regimen was used. A maximum of three embryos were transferred. Hydrosalpinx was defined by prior hysterosalpingography and/or laparoscopy with transcervical dye injection. A total of 237 embryo transfer cycles in women with hydrosalpinges (tubal distension not visible in 151, visible but not drained in 30 and drained in 56) were compared with 705 embryo transfer cycles in women with tubal disease but no hydrosalpinx. Results were analysed in the first three cycles but also separately in the first cycle to check for bias. Success rates were higher in the first cycle, but did not significantly influence overall differences. Implantation rates were significantly reduced overall in the hydrosalpinx group (8.0 versus 13.2% for controls; P < 0.001), being 8.3% (P < 0.01) in the subgroup without evident tubal distension and 7.5% (not significant) in the drained hydrosalpinx group. This study shows that tubal damage with distal occlusion is associated with a marked reduction in embryo implantation, even in the absence of obvious fluid distension. Surgical drainage of distended hydrosalpinges appears to offer no benefit.

No abstract

The use of norethisterone to control the timing of the preceding menstrual cycle and in consequence the timing of the in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle has been evaluated in a therapeutic IVF programme in which oocyte recovery was limited to 2 days each week. A consecutive series of 181 cycles after norethisterone and 29 untreated controls were compared. Menstruation occurred 2-3 days after norethisterone as planned in 82% of patients overall and in 87% of patients whose menstrual cycle length varied by no more than 2 days about the median. Norethisterone treatment did not significantly affect the outcome of IVF treatment compared with the controls in respect to cycles abandoned (12 versus 0%, respectively), peak follicular diameter (mean 18.1 mm versus 18.3 mm 48 h before laparoscopy), oocyte recovery rate (4.6 versus 4.5 per patient), oocyte morphology (63% versus 52% mature), or fertilization rate (72 versus 65% of mature oocytes). Clinical pregnancies were too few for comparison (rates 27 versus 9% per laparoscopy) but the overall rate (23%) indicated effectiveness of the methods. Prior norethisterone treatment appears to be an effective and useful means of controlling the timing of the oocyte recovery in IVF treatment.