Purpose This study assessed the effect of three waves of the COVID-19 pandemic primarily on the number and timing of referrals due to rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and secondarily on the demographic or clinical characteristics of patients. Patients and Methods A retrospective single-centre analysis of medical records included 247 eyes from 247 patients who underwent primary RRD repair with (phaco) vitrectomy between January 1, 2019, and May 31, 2021. Results The percentage of referrals due to primary RRD during the first year of pandemic (March 2020–February 2021) was 16.5% (p=0.179) lower than a year earlier. The percentage of referrals during the first, second and third wave of the pandemic was 48.4%, 18.5% and 26.1% (p=0.029, 0.475, 0.343) lower than in the corresponding months of 2019. A rebound effect was observed only after the first wave. The numbers of referrals in April and May 2021 were similar as in the corresponding months of 2019. No significant differences were observed in the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients admitted before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, other than a tendency towards a higher representation of women, younger persons, longer duration of symptoms but better visual acuity in the latter group. Silicone oil tamponade was used more frequently during the pandemic than before. Conclusion In this study, the COVID-19 pandemic affected the number and timing of referrals due to RRD and the clinical but not demographic characteristics of the patients. The effect lessened with the duration of the pandemic. Previously raised concerns regarding the delay in RRD referrals may no longer be valid during a potential fourth wave of the pandemic. The impact of the pandemic’s waves should be analysed separately, as such an approach provides a better insight into the fluctuations in the number of referrals due to RRD than a year-to-year comparison.
Objectives: Composition of saliva reflects the condition of the oral cavity. The aim of the study: Investigation of the concentrations of MMP-1 (Matrix metalloproteinase-1), MMP-2 (Matrix metalloproteinase-2) and fibronectin in the saliva of patients planned for endodontic treatment or surgical extraction. Material and methods: Seventy-five patients with caries and 14 healthy subjects were included in the study. Subjects were divided into group 1, in which 50 patients were planned for endodontic treatment, and group 2, in which 25 patients were planned for surgical extraction. For the measurements, we used a surface plasmon resonance imaging biosensor. Results: We found higher levels of MMP-1, MMP-2 and fibronectin in the saliva of patients planned for dental treatment than in healthy donors. We found lower concentrations of MMP-2 in subjects planned for surgical extraction, than in patients planned for endodontic treatment; however, there were no such differences in salivary concentrations of MMP-1 and fibronectin. There were no statistically significant differences in MMP-1 concentrations in the saliva before and after any type of dental treatment, but contrary to that, we found a statistically significant decrease in MMP-2 concentrations after endodontic treatment and after surgical extraction. We found a significant rise in the concentrations of fibronectin after surgical extraction but not after endodontic treatment. Conclusions: The concentrations of MMP-1 and MMP-2 in the saliva of our patients with caries were increased in comparison to healthy individuals, but after the treatment—so sanation of the oral cavity—we noted a decrease in matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) levels. MMPs can be found in gingival crevicular fluid and saliva, carious dentin and plaque. According to our observations, the main source of MMPs in patients with caries is probably carious dentin. Increase in the salivary levels of fibronectin (FN) after surgical extraction may be connected with soft tissue injury caused by surgical extraction. Our results are another example of the fact that higher salivary concentrations of MMP-1, MMP-2 and FN can reflect the health status of the oral cavity in patients with caries.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.