◥Oxidative stress, caused by the imbalance between reactive species generation and the dysfunctional capacity of antioxidant defenses, is one of the characteristic features of cancer. Here, we quantified hydrogen peroxide in the tumor microenvironment (TME) and demonstrated that hydrogen peroxide concentrations are elevated in tumor interstitial fluid isolated from murine breast cancers in vivo, when compared with blood or normal subcutaneous fluid. Therefore, we investigated the effects of increased hydrogen peroxide concentration on immune cell functions. NK cells were more susceptible to hydrogen peroxide than T cells or B cells, and by comparing T, B, and NK cells' sensitivities to redox stress and their antioxidant capacities, we identified peroxiredoxin-1 (PRDX1) as a lacking element of NK cells' antioxidative defense. We observed that priming with IL15 protected NK cells' functions in the presence of high hydrogen peroxide and simultaneously upregulated PRDX1 expression. However, the effect of IL15 on PRDX1 expression was transient and strictly dependent on the presence of the cytokine. Therefore, we genetically modified NK cells to stably overexpress PRDX1, which led to increased survival and NK cell activity in redox stress conditions. Finally, we generated PD-L1-CAR NK cells overexpressing PRDX1 that displayed potent antitumor activity against breast cancer cells under oxidative stress. These results demonstrate that hydrogen peroxide, at concentrations detected in the TME, suppresses NK cell function and that genetic modification strategies can improve CAR NK cells' resistance and potency against solid tumors. * À , H 2 O 2 OH * , ONOO À , HOCl, HOBr), hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) has the highest stability and highest intracellular concentration (5). It undergoes facilitated and regulated diffusion across organelle and plasma membranes through aquaporin (AQP) channel transporters (6). Once transported into the cell, H 2 O 2 can be neutralized by intracellular antioxidant defenses, such as lowmolecular-weight thiols-mainly glutathione (GSH)-and various

Objectives: The global morbidity and mortality related to hypertension and associated disorders increases continuously and novel therapeutic strategies are still in high demand. Increasing evidence suggests the important role in blood pressure regulation of cytochrome P-450-dependent metabolites of arachidonic acid. Epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs) induce vasodilation and natriuresis, and have renoprotective and anti-inflammatory properties. 20-HETE is an arachidonic acid metabolite with both prohypertensive and antihypertensive activities. To explore the pathophysiological role of arachidonic acid metabolites in more detail, we examined the antihypertensive efficiency of EET-A, a stable analog of 14,15-EET, and of AAA, a novel antagonist of the 20-HETE receptors. Methods: Male spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) were treated for 5 weeks with EET-A, AAA or the combination; age-matched untreated SHR and normotensive Wistar–Kyoto rats served as controls. EET-A and AAA were administered in drinking water at 10 mg/kg/day each. SBP was measured by telemetry and urine, blood, and tissue samples were collected for relevant analyses. Results: EET-A or AAA given alone had no significant effect on SHR blood pressure. In contrast, combined treatment with AAA and EET-A was significantly antihypertensive, causing a decrease in SBP from 180 ± 3 to 160 ± 5 mmHg (P < 0.05). Additionally, the combined treatment attenuated cardiac hypertrophy, decreased kidney ANG II level, increased natriuresis, and increased the excretion of nitric oxide metabolites. Conclusion: Considering the beneficial impact of the combined treatment with EET-A and AAA on SHR blood pressure and cardiovascular and renal function, we suggest that the treatment is a promising therapeutic strategy for human hypertension.

Background/Aims: We found recently that increasing renal epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs) levels by blocking soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH), an enzyme responsible for EETs degradation, shows renoprotective actions and retards the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Ren-2 transgenic hypertensive rats (TGR) after 5/6 renal ablation (5/6 NX). This prompted us to examine if additional protection is provided when sEH inhibitor is added to the standard renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade, specifically in rats with established CKD. Methods: For RAS blockade, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor along with an angiotensin II type receptor blocker was used. RAS blockade was compared to sEH inhibition added to the RAS blockade. Treatments were initiated 6 weeks after 5/6 NX in TGR and the follow-up period was 60 weeks. Results: Combined RAS and sEH blockade exhibited additional positive impact on the rat survival rate, further reduced albuminuria, further reduced glomerular and tubulointerstitial injury, and attenuated the decline in creatinine clearance when compared to 5/6 NX TGR subjected to RAS blockade alone. These additional beneficial actions were associated with normalization of the intrarenal EETs deficient and a further reduction of urinary angiotensinogen excretion. Conclusion: This study provides evidence that addition of pharmacological inhibition of sEH to RAS blockade in 5/6 NX TGR enhances renoprotection and retards progression of CKD, notably, when applied at an advanced stage.