Methanogenic archaea are a functionally important component of the intestinal microbiota of humans and animals, participating in the utilization of detrimental hydrogen produced during gut fermentation. Despite this, archaeal DNA has rarely been found in intestinal microbiome analyses, which prompts the need to optimize detecting procedures of these microorganisms, including the DNA isolation step. Three commercially available kits for DNA isolation and one extra purification kit that removes PCR inhibitors were evaluated on chicken droppings. In addition, different variants of mechanical lysis and a double elution were tested to ensure the maximum efficiency of DNA isolation from archaea as well as bacteria. A quantitative real-time PCR was used to monitor the optimization progress. As a result, the combination of the selected Genomic Mini AX Bacteria+ kit with a 2-min-long sonication by ultrasonic probe and enzymatic pretreatment gave excellent extraction efficiency rates for DNA of methanogenic archaea (an approximate 50-fold increase compared to the standard enzymatic lysis described by the producer) and, at the same time, provided optimal protection of DNA extracted from bacteria susceptible to enzymatic lysis. The presented results indicate that the optimized protocol allows for highly efficient extraction of total DNA, which is well-suited for quantitative microbial analyses by real-time PCR.
Methanogenic archaea are an important component of the human and animal intestinal microbiota, and yet their presence is rarely reported in publications describing the subject. One of the methods of quantifying the prevalence of methanogens is quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) of the methanogen-specific mcrA gene, and one of the possible reasons for detection failure is usually a methodology bias. Here, we refined the existing protocol by changing one of the primers and improving the conditions of the qPCR reaction. As a result, at the expense of a slightly lower yet acceptable PCR efficiency, the new assay was characterized by increased specificity and sensitivity and a wider linear detection range of 7 orders of magnitude. The lowest copy number of mcrA quantified at a frequency of 100% was 21 copies per reaction. The other validation parameters tested, such as reproducibility and linearity, also gave satisfactory results. Overall, we were able to minimize the negative impacts of primer dimerization and other cross-reactions on qPCR and increase the number of not only detectable but also quantifiable stool samples—or in this case, chicken droppings.
Hydrogen sink is a beneficial process, which has never been properly examined in chickens. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the quantity and quality of microbiota involved in hydrogen uptake with the use of real-time PCR and metagenome sequencing. Analyses were carried out in 50 free-range chickens, 50 commercial broilers, and 54 experimental chickens isolated from external factors. The median values of acetogens, methanogens, sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB), and [NiFe]-hydrogenase utilizers measured in the cecum were approx. 7.6, 0, 0, and 3.2 log10/gram of wet weight, respectively. For the excreta samples, these values were 5.9, 4.8, 4, and 3 log10/gram of wet weight, respectively. Our results showed that the acetogens were dominant over the other tested groups of hydrogen consumers. The quantities of methanogens, SRB, and the [NiFe]-hydrogenase utilizers were dependent on the overall rearing conditions, being the result of diet, environment, agrotechnical measures, and other factors combined. By sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene, archaea of the genus Methanomassiliicoccus (Candidatus Methanomassiliicoccus) were discovered in chickens for the first time. This study provides some indication that in chickens, acetogenesis may be the main metabolic pathway responsible for hydrogen sink.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.