At the core of the aluminum (Al) ion battery is the liquid electrolyte, which governs the underlying chemistry. Optimizing the rheological properties of the electrolyte is critical to advance the state of the art. In the present work, the chloroaluminate electrolyte is made by reacting AlCl3 with a recently reported acetamidinium chloride (Acet-Cl) salt in an effort to make a more performant liquid electrolyte. Using AlCl3:Acet-Cl as a model electrolyte, we build on our previous work, which established a new method for extracting the ionic conductivity from fitting voltammetric data, and in this contribution, we validate the method across a range of measurement parameters in addition to highlighting the model electrolytes’ conductivity relative to current chloroaluminate liquids. Specifically, our method allows the extraction of both the ionic conductivity and voltammetric data from a single, simple, and routine measurement. To bring these results in the context of current methods, we compare our results to two independent standard conductivity measurement techniques. Several different measurement parameters (potential scan rate, potential excursion, temperature, and composition) are examined. We find that our novel method can resolve similar trends in conductivity to conventional methods, but typically, the values are a factor of two higher. The values from our method, on the other hand, agree closely with literature values reported elsewhere. Importantly, having now established the approach for our new method, we discuss the conductivity of AlCl3:Acet-Cl-based formulations. These electrolytes provide a significant improvement (5–10× higher) over electrolytes made from similar Lewis base salts (e.g., urea or acetamide). The Lewis base salt precursors have a low economic cost compared to state-of-the-art imidazolium-based salts and are non-toxic, which is advantageous for scale-up. Overall, this is a noteworthy step at designing cost-effective and performant liquid electrolytes for Al-ion battery applications.
Aluminium (Al) batteries are a promising, next-generation technology and current research efforts are aimed at positioning this technology to compete with existing lithium-ion batteries (LIB). The development of non-aqueous electrolyte chemistries for Al battery systems has received renewed attention to address some of the shortcomings associated with LIB. Of particular importance in this development is the liquid electrolyte as its rheology governs the battery chemistry. The goals are to generate a liquid that is compatible with the other (solid) battery components, stable long-term with repeated use, and to optimise the rheology (i.e. target high conductivity and low viscosity). Chloroaluminate room temperature ionic liquid (RTIL) electrolytes made by mixing Lewis acidic aluminium chloride (AlCl3) salt with a (often chloride-containing) Lewis basic salt e.g. 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride (EMIM-Cl) has been extensively studied. This tuneable electrolyte provides good thermal stability, good ionic conductivity, and a wide polarizable potential window. While these traits are advantageous these types of Lewis basic salt precursors are generally expensive, difficult to synthesize and in some instances can be toxic. Recently, ionic liquid analogues (ILA) that are made from abundant, inexpensive and often non-toxic materials have begun to be explored. To date the two most common Lewis basic salts examined have been urea and acetamide but their rheological and electrochemical properties need to be improved in order to complete with RTIL-based electrolytes. Our group have recently revealed that amidine-based chloroaluminate ILA electrolytes show promise over urea-, acetamide-, and pyrrolidinium-based electrolytes.[1] Specifically, guanidinium chloride (Guan-Cl) and acetamidinium chloride (Acet-Cl) based salts display reversible electrochemical plating/stripping of Al, good ionic conductivities (e.g. 10 mS cm-1), and moderate viscosities (e.g. 50 cP). Also, in this work we initially proposed a mathematical model to extract the conductivity from these electrolytes by fitting the voltammetric i-E curve (from Al deposition/dissolution) to a linear, modified Butler-Volmer formalism. The characteristic, anodic i-E trace shows a striking linearity often over very large potential ranges (e.g. >2 V), and this response is used to extract ionic conductivity. This represents a novel, electroanalytical method to obtain this important rheological metric. As such, in this contribution we will highlight our latest efforts to expand, benchmark (to common methods for measuring conductivity), and determine the limits of our i-E curve fitting method to measure ionic conductivity.[2] Specifically, we have examined the AlCl3:Acet-Cl electrolyte in depth by looking at the potential scanning rate, potential range probed, and the compositional (mole ratio Lewis acid : Lewis base) effect on the conductivity extracted from our fitting method. We have also studied a range of other common chloroaluminate electrolytes to compare with published literature. All of these values are then benchmarked to conductivity data measured both from a traditional impedance-based method and that from a commercial conductivity probe. Lastly, we also have examined temperature-dependent conductivities from all three of these methods. Overall, we find good agreement between values measured from our in situ i-E curve fitting method to those from more traditional conductivity measurement methods. This electroanalytical work serves to deepen our understanding of the conductivity of chloroaluminate ILAs for Al battery applications. References: [1] A.J. Lucio, I. Efimov, O.N. Efimov, C.J. Zaleski, S. Viles, B.B. Ignatiuk, A.P. Abbott, A.R. Hillman, K.S. Ryder. Chem. Commun., 2021, 57, 9834-9837. [2] A.J. Lucio, E. Bulmer, I. Sumarlan, A.R. Hillman, K.S. Ryder. 2022 in preparation. Figure 1
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.