Field experiment results suggest media can diffuse development information directly. Little support found for two-stepflow.b Although it has generated and guided a good deal of communication research in the last 30 years, the two-step flow hypothesis stands as a n oversimplified and at times even erroneous model of how messages diffuse. For that matter, "multi-step," "two-cycle" and other variant models haven't proven much more successful as general predictors of message flows. People seek out, become exposed to, accept, modify and spread messages for a variety of reasons and in numerous ways.Rather than look for one simple model to describe all situations, it seems more fruitful to see how variations in the components of the communication process affect the quantity and quality of message flow. Researchers have already looked at many of these components. As a result, we now see mass media and personal sources as more apt to be complementary than competitive.1 Gatekeeping and influence functions, confounded in early studies, are now seen as distinctly different behaviors.2
Development implies change and change is the result of decisions. Decisions are based on information. But the only information of value is that which the decision maker possesses. This is not to suggest that communication is the major mover toward development. The decision maker's personal resources and the institutional structure of which he is a part limit the range of decisions possible and as a result the range of information relevant for him.However, the effectiveness of a communication system or program can be evaluated in terms of how well it conveys relevant information so that the decision maker has a better perspective of his needs and opportunities, and the possible alternatives of decisions he might make to meet these needs.The present study concerned itself with communications about rural credit in a small-farm area in southern Brazil. Mosher considers production credit as one of the accelerators of agricultural development.1 In a Brazilian study, Fonseca found high economic ability to be the best predictor of practice adoption.2 It brings about changes by permitting a wider choice of alternatives. Diaz Bordenave found that among Brazilian farmers this wider range of decision making also led to a Ivo Schneider, faculty member in the Institute of Economic Studies and Research in the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Brazil, is currently studying for a Ph.D. in mass communications at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. Dr. Fett is an assistant professor of agricultural journalism at Wisconsin currently on a two-year assignment in Brazil. The article is based on Schneider's 1967 M.S. thesis in rural sociology from UFRGS. The assistance of Dr. Lloyd Bostian and Prof. Alzemiro Sturm is acknowledged.higher intensity of search for instrumental information?Specifically, this study attempted to determine what credit information farmers received and through what channels, and what factors were associated with receiving credit information, knowledge of credit sources, knowledge of credit terminology and use of rural credit.The analytic model used is shown in Figure 1. This is based on a paradigm of the adoption process. Situational factors were selected on the basis of best predictors from other studies plus characteristics considered important in the study locale. MethodA modified cluster sampling method was used to select 124 rural properties from the municipio (county) of Ibir~b h .~ Properties with less than five hectares5 (10% of the municipio's properties) or more than 200 hectares (1 % of the properties) were excluded because these represented small subsistence plots with no need for credit or large farms outside of the planned objectives for the municipio.A pretested questionnaire was used to interview the "farm operator" on each property. Interviews were conducted in German in those cases where the farm operator did not understand Portuguese well.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.