Background
Cardiometabolic disorders may worsen Covid-19 outcomes. We investigated features and Covid-19 outcomes for patients with or without diabetes, and with or without cardiometabolic multimorbidity.
Methods
We collected and compared data retrospectively from patients hospitalized for Covid-19 with and without diabetes, and with and without cardiometabolic multimorbidity (defined as ≥ two of three risk factors of diabetes, hypertension or dyslipidaemia). Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the risk of the primary composite outcome (any of mechanical ventilation, admission to an intensive care unit [ICU] or death) in patients with diabetes and in those with cardiometabolic multimorbidity, adjusting for confounders.
Results
Of 354 patients enrolled, those with diabetes (n = 81), compared with those without diabetes (n = 273), had characteristics associated with the primary composite outcome that included older age, higher prevalence of hypertension and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), higher levels of inflammatory markers and a lower PaO2/FIO2 ratio. The risk of the primary composite outcome in the 277 patients who completed the study as of May 15th, 2020, was higher in those with diabetes (Adjusted Odds Ratio (adjOR) 2.04, 95%CI 1.12–3.73, p = 0.020), hypertension (adjOR 2.31, 95%CI: 1.37–3.92, p = 0.002) and COPD (adjOR 2.67, 95%CI 1.23–5.80, p = 0.013). Patients with cardiometabolic multimorbidity were at higher risk compared to patients with no cardiometabolic conditions (adjOR 3.19 95%CI 1.61–6.34, p = 0.001). The risk for patients with a single cardiometabolic risk factor did not differ with that for patients with no cardiometabolic risk factors (adjOR 1.66, 0.90–3.06, adjp = 0.10).
Conclusions
Patients with diabetes hospitalized for Covid-19 present with high-risk features. They are at increased risk of adverse outcomes, likely because diabetes clusters with other cardiometabolic conditions.
Association between hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and diabetes has been widely postulated. Little is known about the effect of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) on glycaemic control. The aim of our study was to evaluate the glycaemic control modifications in a case series of HCV-positive diabetic patients receiving DAAs. We retrospectively evaluated 149 HCV-positive patients in two different institutions affiliated with Sapienza University: Policlinico Umberto I of Rome and Ospedale Santa Maria Goretti of Latina. We were able to identify 29 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (19% of total population) who were receiving different interferon-free regimens. During-treatment fasting glucose (FG) values were available for 21 patients, and analysis revealed a statistically significant reduction (p 0.007); reduction mean value was -52.86 mg/dL. A glycated haemoglobin (A1C) value during treatment (at weeks 4, 8 and/or 12) was available for ten patients, and the analysis revealed a statistically significant reduction (p 0.021) with a reduction mean value of -1.95%. Six patients (23%) needed to reduce hypoglycaemic drugs, eight of ten patients showed reduction of A1C and 14 (67%) of 21 patients showed reduced FG during treatment. FG and A1C reductions values were independent from which DAA was present in the regimen, HCV genotype, body mass index and HIV status. In order to avoid hypoglycaemic events, diabetic patients receiving DAAs should be closely monitored for reduction of hypoglycaemic drugs. Furthermore, in our opinion, diabetes could be considered as an element to prioritize treatment in those patients with no apparent liver disease.
The reduced expression of IL-7Ralpha associated with the persistent immune activation and the alteration of Treg frequencies in part explains the low level of CD4 T cells observed in InR.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.