This study is first to indicate a potentially relevant interaction between ABCG2 421C>A polymorphism and valproate in their effects on lamotrigine disposition.
Aim To estimate the effect size of concomitant antiepileptic therapy on the concentrations of lamotrigine, a drug often prescribed in combination with other antiepileptic drugs (AED), which can act as enzyme inducers or inhibitors. Methods A total of 304 patients with epilepsy, aged 18-70 years, were divided into a lamotrigine monotherapy group and groups receiving lamotrigine with AEDs that act as enzyme inducers, enzyme inhibitors, or both. We compared lamotrigine monotherapy serum concentrations with those where lamotrigine was administered with a metabolic inhibitor valproate, metabolic inducers carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, or topiramate, and both an inducer and an inhibitor. Results Comparison of trough lamotrigine monotherapy concentrations and lamotrigine polytherapy concentrations showed an almost similar median concentration in case of drug-inducers, and higher lamotrigine concentration in case of comedication with valproate as an inhibitor. A significant difference was confirmed after dose correction ( P < 0.001). Significant positive correlations of lamotrigine trough serum concentrations with valproate were observed before and after the dose correction (r = 0.480, P < 0.001 and r = 0.561, P < 0.001, respectively). Positive correlations between the dose-corrected lamotrigine trough concentration and carbamazepine (r = 0.439; P < 0.001) or monohydroxy metabolite of oxcarbazepine (MHD) (r = 0.675; P < 0.001) were also significant. Conclusion Higher valproate levels resulted in higher inhibition potency and higher lamotrigine levels. Increased dose-corrected concentrations of inducers carbamazepine and MHD, after the process of induction was finished, did not lower lamotrigine concentrations. These findings can be of clinical significance for optimal AED dosing.
to evaluate the relationship between epilepsy, antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and quality of life (QoL) in patients with epilepsy (PE), and its association with depressive symptoms and sexual dysfunction (SD). QoL was assessed by use of the Quality of Life in Epilepsy-31 Inventory (QOLIE-31), SD by the Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale (ASEX), and depressive symptoms by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D17). The study included 108 PE (women 63% and men 37% men), mean age 39.54±15.91 years. Focal type epilepsy was diagnosed in 14.8%, generalized type in 35.2%, and both types were present in 40.7% of study patients. Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) was present in 44/108 and vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) was implanted in 27/44 patients. The mean response on QOLIE-31 was 62.88±17.21 with no significant differences according to gender, type of epilepsy, and age. A statistically significantly lower QoL was found in the 'Overall QoL' domain (35-55 vs. <35 age group). Patients taking both types of AEDs had a significantly lower QoL compared to those on newer types of AEDs. Higher QoL was associated with less pronounced depressive symptoms (p=0.000). Significant correlations were found between lower QoL and SD (p=0.001). In 27 patients with DRE having undergone VNS, a favorable effect of VNS implantation on the QoL and mood was observed as compared with 18 patients without VNS (p=0.041).
Despite available pharmacological treatment methods, about 25-40% of patients suffer from pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Such patients are candidates for surgery, that is, classic resectable or minimally invasive neurosurgical treatment. Vagal nerve stimulator (VNS) as minimally invasive neurosurgical treatment is indicated for the adjuvant and palliative treatment of pharmacoresistant epilepsy [1]. The side effects of VNS are mostly transient and mild, such as paraesthesia, cough, dyspnoea, pharyngitis, hoarseness, alteration of voice, neck pain, and swallowing disorders, while laryngeal muscle spasm and obstruction of upper airways occur less frequently, as well as worsening of sleep apnoea. Bradycardia, atrioventricular block, and asystole, as the most severe side effects, are very rare [2]. In 2005 VNS was approved for the adjunctive long-term treatment of chronic or recurrent depression in adult patients experiencing a major depressive episode who had failed to respond to four or more adequate antidepressant treatments. However, the efficacy of VNS for treating depression remains unclear [3].
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.