Once-daily 3g mesalazine administered as granules is superior to 9mg budesonide OD administered as capsules for achieving remission in mild-to-moderately active UC. However, it is noteworthy that remission of UC was attained in about 40% of budesonide-treated patients with a rapid onset of resolution.

No abstract

SummaryBackgroundPrevious studies have reached conflicting conclusions regarding the efficacy of mesalazine in the prevention of recurrent diverticulitis.AimTo investigate the efficacy and safety of mesalazine granules in the prevention of recurrence of diverticulitis after acute uncomplicated diverticulitis.MethodsTwo phase 3, randomised, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind multicentre trials (SAG‐37 and SAG‐51) investigated mesalazine granules in patients with prior episodes (<6 months) of uncomplicated left‐sided diverticulitis. Patients were randomised to receive either 3 g mesalazine once daily or placebo (SAG‐37, n=345) or to receive either 1.5 g mesalazine once daily, 3 g once daily or placebo for 96 weeks (SAG‐51, n=330). The primary endpoint was the proportion of recurrence‐free patients during 48 weeks (SAG‐37 and SAG‐51) or 96 weeks (SAG‐51) of treatment.ResultsMesalazine did not increase the proportion of recurrence‐free patients over 48 or 96 weeks compared to placebo. In SAG‐37, the proportion of recurrence‐free patients during 48 weeks was 67.9% with mesalazine and 74.4% with placebo (P=.226). In SAG‐51, the proportion of recurrence‐free patients over 48 weeks was 46.0% with 1.5 g mesalazine, 52.0% with 3 g mesalazine and 58.0% with placebo (P=.860 for 3 g mesalazine vs placebo) and over 96 weeks 6.9%, 9.8% and 23.1% respectively (P=.980 for 3 g mesalazine vs placebo). Patients with only one diverticulitis episode in the year prior to study entry had a lower recurrence risk compared to >1 episode. Safety data revealed no new adverse events.ConclusionMesalazine was not superior to placebo in preventing recurrence of diverticulitis.

Budesonide at the recommended dose of 9 mg/day can be administered OD without impaired efficacy and safety compared to 3mg TID dosing in mild-to-moderately active Crohn's disease.

No abstract

Backgrounds Acotiamide is a novel acetylcholinesterase inhibitor for treatment of postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) symptoms of functional dyspepsia (FD). This European phase 3 open‐label safety trial has been conducted to evaluate the long‐term safety of acotiamide and explore the efficacy of acotiamide on PDS symptoms using the validated LPDS, quality of life using SF‐36 and SF‐NDI, and work productivity using WPAI. Methods FD‐PDS patients (defined by ROME III criteria) aged ≥18 years with active PDS symptoms and without predominant overlapping symptoms of epigastric pain syndrome and related disorders were enrolled to receive 100 mg acotiamide three times daily for 1 year. Patients' safety profile and efficacy of acotiamide were monitored. Key Results The majority of patients (81.6%) maintained exposure to acotiamide for >50 weeks, with a mean duration of 320.3 days. No specific clinically significant safety concerns have been shown, with no deaths, treatment‐related severe/serious adverse events, or any clinically significant laboratory test results. Although being an open‐label trial, acotiamide showed a change in severity larger than the minimum clinically important difference at weeks 1 and 2 for postprandial fullness and early satiation (meal‐related symptoms), and showed improvement of quality of life and work productivity from the first measurement (at week 12) up to 1 year. Conclusions & Inferences The long‐term safety of acotiamide treatment was confirmed. A clinically important change for PDS symptoms, QoL, and work productivity was suggested; however a controlled trial is required to confirm this hypothetic efficacy of acotiamide. (NCT01973790).

No abstract

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.