This study analyzed the impact of sustainability reporting on firms' growth as a result of adopting an environmentally and socially responsible behavior. The information published by companies listed on the main section of the Bucharest Stock Exchange during a period spanning six financial years (2012-2017) was used to assess the influence exerted by the conduct of activities related to sustainability; the integrated reporting of economic, social and environmental protection information; and the quality of published reports on certain indicators relevant to appreciating a firm's growth (price-to-book ratio, sales growth and cost of capital). The results obtained indicate a low influence of sustainable reporting on a firm's growth indicators. Current and potential investors, lenders and business partners interpret sustainability reporting as insufficiently documented and as having a low capacity for integration within the decision-making process. However, significant dependency relationships were identified, and particularized on various connections without following a correlation pattern between a firm's growth directions and the indicators of sustainability reporting. The results remain robust even after the introduction of certain control variables, such as sustainability sensitive industry sectors, company size and age, or increase of investments. Our paper sets out to contribute to expanding the specialty literature by highlighting the involvement of sustainable reporting as a factor in optimizing firms' growth strategies and, at a methodological level, by using a quantile regression.

The quality of financial information is a decisive landmark in the decision-making process of all users. This is why meeting the quality criteria should be a desideratum for all the stakeholders involved in the development and verifying of financial reports. In this context, this paper aims to analyze the influence exercised by the audit opinion on the quality of the financial information reported by Romanian companies listed on the regulated market of the Bucharest Stock Exchange. Quality is assessed in terms of the degree of manipulation of operational activities (intervention in the conduct of commercial transactions and controlling the cost of the goods sold via overproduction, respectively). The analyzed data cover a time frame of 6 financial years (2012)(2013)(2014)(2015)(2016)(2017), and the dependency relations are also tested by introducing control variables such as: company size, indebtedness, profitability and reputation of the auditor. The results obtained highlight the contribution of the audit opinion to boosting the quality of financial information, measured based on the degree of manipulation of sales (under the aspect of value and the time when the transactions were made). In case of manipulation via overproduction, the audit opinion does not exercise significant influences, reflecting possible limitations of the audit endeavor in terms of its capacity to identify corrupt activities associated with production. The auditor's reputation does not have a significant impact on the manipulation of sales, only in overproduction case this characteristic having a positive role.

The paper analyzes the influence of sustainable growth (SGR) as a reflection of the manner of strategic business organization, particularly in the quality of reported financial information (magnitude of discretionary accruals—DAC) as an expression of the ethical attitude adopted by companies in the entity–investor relationship, on the investors’ decisions, substantiated in the performance level of the shares held. Using models consecrated in the literature, the results reflect a significant influence, both in the case of separate testing of the two factors (SGR and DAC), and in the case of the conjugated action thereof, on investment performance. The relations were also tested by introducing certain control variables into the analysis, such as: the intangible ratio, quick ratio, company size, as well as the SGR sensitivity function of the level of information quality. In the case of financial information quality, specific indicators from the two consecrated value relevance testing models by Ohlson (1995) and Easton and Harris (1991) were used as control variables. The obtained results are robust, preserving the sense and intensity of the influences. However, in the case of testing for the influence of information quality on share price, it was noticed an insignificant relation, associated with the situation in which, to execute some speculative transactions, investors particularly interpreted conjunctural factors. The study contributes to the development of the specialty literature by highlighting the role of internal growth and information quality as determinant factors in the investors’ analyses, while also offering a potentially practical tool for assessing the opportunity of making placements in the capital of companies.

No abstract

No abstract