Pregnancy at advanced maternal age (age >35 years old) is considered a risk factor for adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Yet, pregnancies of advanced maternal age have become more prevalent over the last few decades. Possible maternal complications of pregnancy at age 35 or older include increased risk of spontaneous miscarriage, preterm labor, gestational diabetes mellitus, pre-eclampsia, stillbirth, chromosomal abnormalities, and cesarean delivery. Possible adverse fetal outcomes include infants small for gestational age and intrauterine growth restrictions, low Apgar score, admission to neonatal intensive care units, and an autism spectrum disorder. This paper aims to present an up-to-date review of the literature, summarizing the most current studies and implications for the management of pregnancy of advanced maternal age.
ImportanceThe SARS-CoV-2 alpha variant posed increased risk for COVID-19 complications in pregnant women. However, its impact on the maternal humoral response and placental IgG transport remains unclear.ObjectiveTo characterize the maternal humoral waning and neonate immunity acquired during the 3rd COVID-19 wave in Israel, dominated by the Alpha variant, as compared to earlier Wildtype infections and humoral response to vaccination across gestation.DesignMaternal and fetal blood serum were collected at delivery since April 2020 from parturients. Sera IgG and IgM titers were measured using the Milliplex MAP SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Panel supplemented with additional HA-coupled microspheres.SettingA nationwide multicenter cohort study on SARS-CoV-2 infections and vaccination during pregnancy.ParticipantsExpectant women presenting for delivery were recruited at 8 medical centers across Israel and assigned to 3 primary groups: SARS-CoV-2 positive (n = 157) and fully vaccinated during pregnancy (n = 125), and unvaccinated noninfected controls matched to the infected group by BMI, maternal age, comorbidities and gestational age (n = 212). Eligibility criteria included pregnant women without active COVID-19 disease, age ≥18 years and willingness to provide informed consent.Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s)Pregnant women’s humoral response is dependent on the SARS-CoV-2 strain.ResultsThe humoral response to infection as detected at birth, showed a gradual and significant decline as the interval between infection/vaccination and delivery increased. Significantly faster decay of antibody titers was found for infections occurring during the 3rd wave compared to earlier infections/vaccination. Cord blood IgG antigens levels correlated with maternal IgG. However, cord IgG-HA variance significantly differed in SARS-CoV2 infections as compared to the other groups. No sexual dimorphism in IgG transfer was observed. Lastly, high fetal IgM response to SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 17 neonates, all showing elevated IgM to N suggesting exposure to SARS-Cov-2 antigens.Conclusions and RelevanceInfections occurring during the 3rd wave induced a faster decline in humoral response when compared to Wildtype infections or mRNA BNT162b2 vaccination during pregnancy, consistent with a shift in disease etiology and severity induced by the Alpha variant. Vaccination policies in previously infected pregnant women should consider the timing of exposure along pregnancy as well as the risk of infection to specific variants of concern.Key PointsQuestionWhat is the difference in the maternal-fetal humoral response between Alpha variant and SARS-CoV-2 Wildtype infections?FindingsIn this nationwide multicenter study including 494 pregnant women, the maternal humoral response to Alpha variant infection was weaker and shorter when compared to Wildtype infections. Placental transport compensated for the maternal waning of immunity. Fetal sex did not affect humoral response.MeaningVaccination policies should be adjusted to account for the timing of infection and the SARS-CoV-2 variant.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.