Background: Pulmonary mycoses are important diseases of the respiratory tract caused by pulmonary fungal pathogens. These pathogens are responsible for significant morbidity and mortality rates worldwide; however, less attention has been paid to them. In this study we determined the prevalence of pulmonary fungal pathogens among individuals with clinical features of pulmonary tuberculosis at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital. Method: This was a hospital based cross sectional survey. Sputum samples were collected from each study participant. For each sample, the following tests were performed: Sabouraud dextrose agar for fungal culture, GeneXpert for Mycobacteria tuberculosis (MTB) and potassium hydroxide for fungal screening. Filamentous fungal growth and yeasts were further examined with lactophenol cotton blue staining and germ tube respectively. Results: Out of 113 study participants, 80 (70.7%) had pulmonary fungal pathogens whilst those with pulmonary tuberculosis numbered five (4.4%). Candida albicans [21 (22.58%)] and Aspergillus species [16 (17.20%)] were the pathogens most identified among others. Two (1.7%) TB GeneXpert positive participants had fungal pathogens isolated from their sputum samples. We established a prevalence of 57 (71.3%) for pulmonary fungal pathogen (PFP) isolates, three (60.0%) for MTB in HIV positive patients and 18 (22.5%) for PFP, and zero (0.0%) for MTB in HIV negative patients. On the other hand, two (100%) HIV positive patients had both PFP isolates and MTB. Conclusion: Our findings highlight the diversity of neglected pulmonary fungal pathogens whose known medical importance in causing pulmonary mycoses cannot be overemphasised. Therefore this presents a need for routine diagnosis for pulmonary mycoses among TB suspects and set-up of antimicrobial profile for pulmonary fungal isolates to support clinical management of these cases.
Background: Pulmonary mycoses are very important diseases of the respiratory tract and are responsible for significant morbidity and mortality rates worldwide. However less attention has been paid to them. In this study we determined the prevalence of pulmonary mycoses and their aetiological agents among individuals with clinical signs of pulmonary tuberculosis at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital (MRRH). Method: This was a Laboratory based cross sectional survey in which 113 participants were recruited. Sputum samples were corrected from each study participant. To each sample the following tests were done; Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA) Culture, GeneXpert and Potassium hydroxide (KOH). Fungal growth of filamentous fungi and yeasts were further examined with LPCB and Germ tube respectively. Generated data was analysed using R studio. Results: Out of 113 participants, 80 (70.8%) had pulmonary mycoses whilst those with pulmonary tuberculosis were 5 (4.4%). C. albicans 22.58% and Aspergillus species 17.20%) were the most aetiological agents for pulmonary mycoses identified among others. Of those who were TB GeneXpert positive, 2 (1.77%) of them were co-infected with pulmonary mycoses. We established a prevalence of 57 (71.3%) for PFI, 3 (60.0%) for MTB in HIV sero positive patients and 18 (22.5%) for PFI, 0 (0.00%) for MTB in HIV sero negative patients. On the other hand, 2 (100%) sero positive patients were co-infected with both PFI and MTB.Conclusion: Our findings highlight the medical importance of pulmonary fungal infections among patients suspected for TB. Importantly, the aetiological diversity established here is rich enough to suggest precise examination using different methods. Established scope of aetiological agents is predominated by opportunistic fungi which when superimposed on to certain underlying conditions such as TB, their effects can be fatal. Therefore this possibility presents a need to employ appropriate strategies for prevention, diagnosis, and management in TB suspects.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.