No abstract

Over recent years, a new technology named VANET (Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks) is highly recommended in smart cities and especially in Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). The VANET technology relies on the nodes acting like cars without the necessity for any controller or central base station by creating a wireless link among them. It enables cars to send and receive information between themselves and their environment. most VANETs utilize position-based routing protocols because they contain a GPS device. To deal with VANET problems, one solution is Geographic Perimeter Stateless Routing (GPSR) which has been broadly implemented. This paper suggests an effective intelligent fuzzy logic control system; called the FL-QN GPSR routing protocol. The proposed routing protocol incorporates two metrics link quality, and neighbor node to detect the best next-hop node for packet forwarding also updates the format of the Hello message by adding the direction field to be more suitable to our simulation. The OMNeT++ and SUMO simulation tools are both used in parallel to examine the VANET environment. The obtained results of the four simulation experiments in urban environments indicate substantial improvements in the network performance compared to the traditional GPSR and AODV concerning the QoS parameters.

Vehicular Ad hoc Networks (VANETs), a subsection of Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANETs), have strong future application prospects. Because topology structures are rapidly changing, determining a route that can guarantee a good Quality of Service (QoS) is a critical issue in VANETs. Routing is a critical component that must be addressed in order to utilize effective communication among vehicles. The purpose obtained from this study is to compare the AODV and GPSR performance in terms of Packet Delivery Ratio, Packet Drop Ratio, Throughput, and End-to-End Delay by applying three scenarios, the first scenario focuses on studying these protocols in terms of QoS while changing the number of vehicles at a constant speed of 40Km/h, and for the second scenario changing the speed value while keeping a constant number of vehicles which is 100, the third involves changing the communication range at a constant speed and vehicle number. This study represents a foundation for researchers to help elaborate on the strength and weaknesses of these two protocols. OMNeT++ in conjunction with SUMO is used for simulation.

No abstract

No abstract