Even though drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty has emerged as a treatment option for drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis (DES-ISR), the most effective treatment strategy for DES-ISR is still under debate. Therefore, we compared long-term clinical outcomes following DCB treatment of DES-ISR with those following 2nd-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) treatment. We identified 248 DES-ISR lesions in 238 patients that were treated with either 2nd-generation DES implantation (n = 56) or DCB angioplasty (n = 192). We compared the incidences of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in the two groups during the 2-year period following treatment. MACE was defined as cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or target-vessel revascularization. The percentage of patients with diabetes and the mean age of patients in the DCB group were greater than in the DES group. The DCB group also had a smaller reference vessel diameter. The DES group had a larger post-intervention minimal luminal diameter. We found no significant difference in the MACE rate between the two groups during the 2 years following treatment (11.0 % in the DCB group vs. 8.9 % in the DES group, p = 0.660). Reference segment diameter was the only independent predictive factor for MACE in the post-treatment period (hazard ratio 0.35, 95 % confidence interval: 0.15-0.82, p = 0.016). Clinical efficacy of DCB angioplasty for treatment of DES-ISR was comparable to that of 2nd-generation DES implantation as measured by the rate of MACEs in the two groups. Reference segment diameter was the only statistically significant independent predictor for MACE in the 2-year period following treatment.
The study found pain to reperfusion time, MI territory, ST resolution, basal GLS value are the most important predictors of myocardial functional recovery. Regular follow-up with echocardiography for STEMI patients with different reperfusion strategies has informative impact on long-term clinical outcome. Also the study confirmed that PPCI is better than thrombolysis not only in restoring epicardial coronary flow but also in restoring microvascular and tissue perfusion assuring better myocardial functional recovery and better long-term clinical outcomes.
This study hypothesized that imaging provides information indicating the right ventricular (RV) involvement after anterior or inferior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), beyond standard electrocardiogram (ECG) due to the increasing interest in RV function and assessment techniques. This study aimed to compare RV function between anterior and inferior MI without RV involvement using different echocardiographic modalities. This study included 100 patients with anterior (50 patients) and inferior (50 patients) STEMI, who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) and two-dimensional echocardiographic imaging within 24 h after PPCI with RV function analysis by left ventricular (LV) infarct size, LV filling pressure, and RV strain rate. Our primary endpoint was the subclinical RV dysfunction in anterior or inferior MI using tissue Doppler and speckle tracking (STE). The study population included 80 (80%) males and 20 (20%) females. Patients with the anterior STEMI had higher mean creatine kinase-MB (CKMB) and troponin than those with inferior STEMI. This study revealed worse RV dysfunction in patients with anterior than those with inferior STEMI, as reflected by significantly lower RV systolic function, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (p ≤ 0.0001), tissue Doppler-derived velocity (p ≤ 0.0001), and STE-derived strain magnitude and rate (p ≤ 0.0001). RV dysfunction occurs in patients without ECG evidence of RV STEMI. RV dysfunction is worse in anterior than inferior MI. Moreover, RV systolic functions were affected by declined LV ejection fraction irrespective of the infarction site, which clinically implies prognostic, treatment, survival rate, and outcome improvement between both conditions. (Trial registration ZU-IRB#:4142/26–12-2017 Registered 26 December 2017, email: IRB_123@medicine.zu.edu.eg).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.