Objectives
: This systematic review aims to describe the value of saliva as a non-invasive sample for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, in comparison with the current method for sample collection, the nasopharyngeal swabs.
Methods
: We conducted a systematic review of the literature, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. We searched in 5 databases: PubMed, Cochrane, EBSCO, Elsevier, and MEDLINE, and included articles published between December 2019 and July 2020.
Results
: This review included 22 publications that met inclusion criteria, 17 of which were case series, 2 case reports, and 3 massive screenings. All articles compared saliva with nasopharyngeal swabs. The detection rate of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva was similar to NPS. The sensitivity ranged between 20% and 97%, and specificity ranged between 66 and 100%.
Conclusions
: This systematic review found that saliva might be an appropriate, fast, painless, simple, and non-invasive sample for SARS-CoV-2 detection, making it ideal for massive screening of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.