Objectives/Hypothesis: The primary treatment of adductor spasmodic dysphonia is repeated injections of botulinum toxin type A (Botox) into the thyroarytenoid muscles. Dosing can be performed into either one or both thyroarytenoid muscles. The objective of this study was to evaluate the treatment effect and side effect profile across a large number of injections. This study was performed previously in 2002 on 45 patients. Study Design: Individual cohort study. Methods: This is retrospective study of all patients with adductor spasmodic dysphonia with and without tremor treated by the senior laryngologist at George Washington University. In the current study, 272 patients (214 females and 58 males) were included in the current analysis. Duration of effects and side effects (vocal weakness and liquid dysphagia) were recorded into a database for each patient after each injection. These data were analyzed using χ 2 analysis. Results: A total of 4,023 injections (2,708 bilateral and 1,315 unilateral) were evaluated in this study. Optimal effect duration (≥3 months) was more commonly seen in the bilaterally injected patients (55%) compared to the unilaterally injected patients (47%) (P = .0001). Optimal side effect duration (≤2 weeks) was better for the unilaterally injected patients (77%) compared to the bilaterally injected patients (73%) (P = .023). Having both optimal effect and side effect in the same injection was more commonly seen in the bilaterally injected patients (36%) compared to the unilaterally injected patients (33%) (P = .0228). Conclusions: This study shows that bilateral injections of Botox are more effective in producing optimal effect/side effect profiles.
Introduction:
Suboptimal nutrition is a known contributor to the development of cardiovascular disease. In the past decade, focus has been on improving the quality of hospital food with nutrition and policy science initiating programs, e.g. Healthy Food in Health Care. Little has been studied on the impact of these improvements on diet choices after discharge. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate if inpatient diet orders play a role in nutrition after discharge.
Methods:
Patients ≥18 years of age admitted to the medicine service with either a regular or cardiac diet order were recruited. Exclusion criteria were the following dietary parameters—fluid restriction, low potassium, diabetic, gluten free, or vegan diets. Patients were given a baseline questionnaire using a Lickert scale to assess dietary behaviors, nutrition counseling during admission, and demographics. One month post-discharge, a follow-up questionnaire was given to reassess their dietary choices.
Results:
In this preliminary analysis, 70 subjects were enrolled: 57.1% (n= 40) regular diet and 42.0% (n=30) cardiac diet. 38.6% (n=27) believed diet orders during admission were part of the their medical treatment. At follow-up, 55 patients remained and included in the final analysis. 50 with identifiable subject IDs: 57.4% (n= 27) regular diet and 42.5% (n=20) cardiac diet. 15 were lost to follow up: 1 deceased, 2 declined to participate, 2 were readmitted to the hospital, and the remaining were not reachable. Diet was reported as always important to overall health 50.0% (n=35) at baseline vs 72.7% (n=40, p= 0.642) at follow up. 22.8% (n=16) of subjects stated never reading nutrition labels in comparison to follow-up 12.7% (n=7, p= 0.019). Never monitoring salt intake was reported among 23.6% (n=9) patients at baseline and 12.7% at follow-up (n=6, p=0.043). Subjects reported that nutrition education was never received during their inpatient or outpatient follow up period (30% (n=21) vs 76.3% (n=42), p=0.0002).
Conclusions:
To-date, our pilot study shows inpatient diet orders having the potential to influence dietary behaviors with significant changes in food label reading and monitoring salt intake after discharge. Nutrition education was significantly never given in both inpatient and outpatient settings. However, most patients believe nutrition is important to their overall health, further supporting receptivity to nutrition education during inpatient and outpatient follow-up education.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.