The physiological role of cellular retinoic acid-binding proteins (CRABPs) may be to influence the intracellular level of free retinoic acid in the cell. In the present study two isoforms of CRABP, CRABP-I and CRABP-II were partially characterized in various human Malpighian epithelia and in human cultured keratinocytes expressing various patterns of differentiation. We have developed a new sensitive radiobinding assay using a PAGE/autoradioblotting technique which effectively separates CRABP-I and CRABP-II. This method allows the simultaneous quantification of these proteins. We show that CRABP-I and -II have similar M(r) values (15,000), but differ in their dissociation constant towards retinoic acid (Kd of 16.6 nM and 50 nM respectively), in pI (4.86 and 5.13) and in their relative mobilities (RF) on PAGE under nondenaturating conditions (RF values 0.65 and 0.44). In addition, we show that CRABP-II is the major isoform expressed in human keratinocytes, in vivo as in vitro. Furthermore, we demonstrate that CRABP-II is actually the CRABP previously studied in epidermal cells by a PAGE assay (Siegenthaler & Saurat (1987) Eur. J Biochem. 166, 209-214) and whose levels are dramatically increased by retinoic acid and its analogues in human epidermis. Keratinocytes, in the absence of full terminal differentiation, as well as hyperplasia, such as cultured human differentiating keratinocytes, psoriatic plaques, and non-keratinized oral mucosa, contained high levels of CRABP-II. CRABP-I was not detected in cultured keratinocytes, whereas normal skin (at full terminal differentiation) expressed CRABP-I and CRABP-II at a ratio of approx. 1:1.4. This value was approx. 1:17 in lesional psoriatic skin and 1:8 in oral mucosa. These observations suggest that CRABP-I and -II are regulated differently in human keratinocytes. The sharp increases in CRABP-II levels are associated with an alteration in the differentiation programme, as well as with cell response to retinoic acid overload, whereas CRABP-I might be a marker for terminal differentiation.

Cellular retinoic acid-binding proteins (CRABPs) might exert a physiological function by controlling the intracellular levels of free retinoic acid. The aim of this study was to analyze the relative expression of CRABP-I and CRABP-II in lesional (LPS) and nonlesional (NLPS) psoriatic skin. CRABP-I and -II proteins were analyzed by a PAGE-autoradioblotting technique, and their respective mRNA were studied by RNA blot and in situ hybridization. We found that CRABP-II levels were 6-fold higher in LPS and 2-fold in NLPS as compared to normal skin, whereas CRABP-I levels were decreased in NLPS and LPS. CRABP-II mRNA were grossly overexpressed in all LPS and some NLPS specimens. These results indicate a switch to the overexpression of CRABP-II mRNA in psoriasis which induces high levels of the protein mainly in LPS; these observations may be relevant to the pathophysiology and therapy of psoriasis as CRABP-I and -II have different ligand-binding affinities.

No abstract

We have recently shown the kinetic behavior of liver retinyl esters in rats with adequate vitamin A levels receiving oral vitamin supplementation. In the present work we have studied the effects of intramuscular administration of a vitamin A preparation on the metabolism of vitamin A in the rat. Retinol administered intramuscularly to rats in the form of an emulsion brought about a significant increase in the serum and liver concentration of vitamin A; this increase was slightly less than in orally treated rats. In each group, retinyl palmitate constituted 80–85% of the total retinyl esters, followed by stearate (9–13%), laurate, palmitoleate, myristate, linoleate and pentadecanoate making up 3–10%. The subcellular localization of all retinyl esters is similar and dependent on age but not on the route of administration. These results indicate that although the best hepatic storage is achieved with an orally administered vitamin A emulsion, the intramuscular administration of a physiological dose might provide an effective supplementation method if oral vitamin A is contra-indicated.

No abstract