No abstract

Primary focal hyperhidrosis is a common disorder for which treatment is often a therapeutic challenge. A systematic review of current literature on the various treatment modalities for primary focal hyperhidrosis was performed and a step-by-step approach for the different types of primary focal hyperhidrosis (axillary, palmar, plantar and craniofacial) was established. Non-surgical treatments (aluminium salts, local and systemic anticholinergics, botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) injections and iontophoresis) are adequately supported by the current literature. More invasive surgical procedures (suction curettage and sympathetic denervation) have also been extensively investigated, and can offer a more definitive solution for cases of hyperhidrosis that are unresponsive to non-surgical treatments. There is no consensus on specific techniques for sympathetic denervation, and this issue should be further examined by meta-analysis. There are numerous treatment options available to improve the quality of life (QOL) of the hyperhidrosis patient. In practice, however, the challenge for the dermatologist remains to evaluate the severity of hyperhidrosis to achieve the best therapeutic outcome, this can be done most effectively using the Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS).

IMPORTANCE Skin cancer is the most frequent cancer type. It remains unknown if and how screening programs can be organized in a cost-effective manner. OBJECTIVE To compare the 2 screening strategies of systematic total-body examination (TBE) and lesion-directed screening (LDS), with a focus on the participation rate, detection rate, anxiety, and cost. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Population-based cross-sectional screenings by a team of 6 dermatologists were organized in 2 sociodemographically similar regions. The TBE was organized in a community of 9325 inhabitants 18 years and older (Wichelen, East Flanders, Belgium) during a 5-day screening (March 14-18, 2014). The LDS was organized in a sociodemographically comparable community (Nevele, East Flanders, Belgium) of 9484 adult inhabitants during a 4-day screening (April 22 and 25-27, 2014). The first population received a personal invitation for a standard TBE. In the second population, individuals were invited for an LDS if they had a lesion meeting 1 or more of the following criteria: ABCD rule (A, asymmetry; B, borders; C, colors; and D, differential structures), ugly duckling sign, new lesion lasting longer than 4 weeks, or red nonhealing lesions. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES In total, 1982 individuals were screened, and 47 skin cancers (2.4%) were histologically confirmed, including 9 melanomas (0.5%), 37 basal cell carcinomas (1.9%), and 1 squamous cell carcinoma or Bowen disease (0.1%). RESULTS The positive predictive value for all suspicious lesions was 56.6% (47 of 83). The participation rate was 17.9% (1668 of 9325) in the TBE group vs 3.3% (314 of 9484) in the LDS group (P < .01). The skin cancer detection rate per 100 participants did not differ significantly between the 2 groups, with rates of 2.3% (39 of 1668) in the TBE group vs 3.2% (8 of 248) in the LDS group (P = .40). The operational effectiveness per 100 invitees was 0.4% (39 of 9325) in the TBE group vs 0.1% (8 of 9484) in the LDS group (P < .01). In addition, LDS was 5.6 times less time consuming than TBE. Participants in the LDS group had significantly higher baseline anxiety levels compared with participants in the TBE group (3.7 vs 3.3 points on a visual analog scale, P < .01). In screenees without a suspicious lesion, anxiety levels significantly dropped after screening. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Total-body examination yielded a higher absolute number of skin cancers. Lesion-directed screening had a similar detection rate of 3.2% (8 of 248) but was 5.6 times less time consuming. When performed by dermatologists, LDS is an acceptable alternative screening method in health care systems with limited budgets or long waiting lists.

No abstract

We found that tumour size and aggressive histology are the strongest indication criteria for MMS. Recurrence and aggressive histology are predictors for extensive subclinical spread but not for two or more rounds of MMS. Evidence-based indications for MMS are necessary to ensure cost-effective management of BCC.

The incidence of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) has risen three- to fourfold over the last 30 years and is expected to continue to increase with ageing of the population. Although BCC has a good prognosis, it causes significant morbidity and has an important impact on the public health budget due to direct treatment costs. Based on the existing evidence, a systematic evaluation of the World Health Organization criteria was performed to determine whether earlier detection of BCC could reduce morbidity and cost. BCC slowly increases in size, with a median increase in diameter of 0·5 mm over 10 weeks. There is an important delay in diagnosis ranging from 19 to 25 months. In several studies BCC size was the main determinant of treatment cost, surgical complexity, reconstruction technique and the specific surgical procedure performed, such as Mohs micrographic surgery or surgical excision. One study showed that size also seems to affect the cost per treatment for other nonsurgical options. The use of vismodegib, an inhibitor of the hedgehog pathway, is confined to locally advanced or metastatic BCC. Delays in diagnosis and appropriate treatment are the most important underlying causes in the occurrence of giant BCC and/or BCC with metastasis. Although the latter represent only a very small fraction of all BCCs, the majority of them are located in the facial region. The available data point to a slow increase in the size of BCCs over time. Size is one of the major determinants in choice of treatment and the associated cost, especially for facial BCC. Therefore we conclude that current data support early detection and adequate management of BCCs on the face.

No abstract

IMPORTANCESeveral epidemiological studies show an alarming global increase in incidence of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer.OBJECTIVES To examine the cost-effectiveness of 2 population-based skin cancer screening methods and to assess their budget effect and the influence on skin cancer epidemiological findings. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSA Markov model with a latent period of 20 years and a time horizon of 50 years was used to analyze the cost-effectiveness (societal perspective) and budget effect (public health care payer perspective) of 2 population-based skin cancer screening programs in Belgium compared with the absence of a screening program. A health economic analysis was based on a clinical trial performed in 2014 in Belgium. In the economic model, the total Belgian population 18 years or older was assumed to have been invited for the screening program. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESThe influence of the screening program on skin cancer epidemiological findings and the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, as well as the budget effect, expressed as the net costs for the health care payer over 50 years. RESULTS All participants (1668 total-body skin examination [TBSE] and 248 lesion-directed screening [LDS]) were screened by a team of 6 dermatologists from March 14 to 18, 2014, for TSBE and April 22 and 25 to 27, 2014, for LDS. Both screening strategies produced a gain in QALYs, resulting in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of €33 072 (US $35 475) per QALY in men and €18 687 (US $20 044) per QALY in women for TBSE and €34 836 (US $37 365) per QALY in men and €19 470 (US $20 884) per QALY in women for LDS. With a 1-time screening, a 4.0% decrease in the incidence rates of stage III and IV melanoma was predicted at the population level relative to the comparator. The budget effect analysis demonstrated that during 20 years, a 1-time screening would incur a net cost for the health care payer of almost €36 million