Background Standard coagulation parameters are used to guide prophylactic blood product transfusion prior to invasive procedures in cirrhotic patients despite limited high-quality evidence. Aims We aimed to describe coagulation parameters and prophylactic blood product use in cirrhotic patients having invasive procedures, and the influence of both on periprocedural bleeding. Methods We conducted a cohort study of cirrhotic patients undergoing invasive procedures at a referral hospital. Procedures were classified into low or moderate-high bleeding risk. Prophylactic blood component was defined as fresh frozen plasma, cryoprecipitate or platelet transfusion prior to procedures. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with procedure-related bleeding. Results We identified 566 procedures in 233 cirrhotic patients. Prophylactic blood product was given before 16% of high-risk and 11% of low-risk procedures (P = 0.18). Eight (8.3%) high-risk procedures were complicated by postprocedural bleeding, six of which occurred in patients without significant coagulopathy. The bleeding rate for low-risk procedures was 0.4%. For patients with international normalized ratio >1.5, platelet count <50 x 10 9 /L, or both, the rate of bleeding was comparable between those given and not given prophylactic blood products (3.1 vs. 1.9%; P = 0.63). After adjusting for age, sex, platelet count, international normalized ratio, acute kidney injury, sepsis and model of end-stage liver disease, the only factor significantly predicting procedure-related bleeding was the procedural bleeding risk category (P < 0.01). Conclusions Procedure-related bleeding in cirrhotic patients cannot be accurately predicted by INR or platelet count, nor prevented by blood component prophylaxis using these parameters. Procedure-related bleeding is best predicted by the bleeding risk status of procedures.

BackgroundNon‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a major healthcare burden. Real‐world outcomes in dedicated tertiary care settings in Australia remain unknown.AimTo evaluate the initial outcomes of patients referred to a dedicated multidisciplinary tertiary care NAFLD clinic.MethodsRetrospective review of all adult patients with NAFLD who attended a dedicated tertiary care NAFLD clinic between January 2018 and February 2020 and who had two clinic visits and FibroScans at least 12 months apart. Demographic and health‐related clinical and laboratory data were extracted from electronic medical records. Key outcome measures were serum liver chemistries, liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and weight control at 12 months.ResultsA total of 137 patients with NAFLD were included. Median (interquartile range (IQR)) follow‐up time was 392 days (343–497 days). One hundred and eleven patients (81%) achieved weight control (i.e. weight loss or stability). Markers of liver disease activity were significantly improved, including median (IQR) serum alanine aminotransferase (48 (33–76) vs 41 (26–60) U/L, P = 0.009) and aspartate aminotransferase (35 (26–54) vs 32 (25–53) U/L, P = 0.020). Median (IQR) LSM across the whole cohort was significantly improved (8.4 (5.3–11.8) vs 7.0 (4.9–10.1) kPa, P = 0.001). No significant reduction was observed in mean body weight or the frequency of metabolic risk factors.ConclusionsThis study highlights a new model of care for patients with NAFLD and demonstrates promising initial outcomes in relation to significant reductions in markers of liver disease severity. Although most patients achieved weight control, further refinements are needed to achieve significant weight reduction including more frequent and structured dietetic and/or pharmacotherapeutic interventions.

No abstract